Prov, overview

ChristadelphianBooksOnline The Agora Bible Articles and Lessons: P-Q

Author: Solomon and others.

Time: 1000 — 700 BC.

Summary: Proverbs is a collection of wise sayings from several sources, including King Solomon, laying practical rules for right living based on godly wisdom. The sayings deal with many different problems and situations. Most of the proverbs are very short and easy to remember. The proverbs are not organized in a way which puts all the sayings on one topic together. Instead, almost every verse raises a new and important idea. Proverbs presents the idea that humans are either good or evil, wise or foolish, with God or without him. Both are known by their deeds, their “fruits”, their chosen “ways” in life and their fitting ends.

Key verse: “The fear of the Lord is the beginning, of wisdom, and knowledge of the Holy One is understanding” (Pro 9:10).

Outline

1. Superiority of the way of wisdom: Pro 1:1 – 9:18
a) Introduction: Pro 1:1-7
b) Appeals and warnings confronting youth: Pro 1:8-33

c) Commendation of wisdom: Pro 2:1-4:27
d) Warnings against folly: Pro 5:1-7:27
e) Appeals addressed to youth: Pro 8:1-9:18
2. Main collection of Solomon’s proverbs: Pro 10:1-22:16
3. The thirty sayings of the wise: Pro 22:17-24:22
4. Additional sayings of the wise: Pro 24:23-24
5. Hezekiah’s collection of Solomon’s proverbs: Pro 25:1 – 29:27
6. The words of Agur: Pro 30:1-33
7. The words of Lemuel: Pro 31:1-9
8. The virtuous woman: Pro 31:10-31

Prov, parents and children

ChristadelphianBooksOnline The Agora Bible Articles and Lessons: P-Q

If we thought of Solomon as a writer with nothing better than a worldly wisdom empirically acquired, we should probably not seek his advice in family matters. The ostentation of an oriental court would provide the worst possible atmosphere for such a study just as the experience of a prince would be the worst training for ordinary mortals. It is because we believe that the wisdom of Solomon was divinely bestowed that we seek his counsel.

There are not very many direct references to parents and children in the book of Proverbs but such passages as appear are very definite in character. The instruction to fathers is indeed so emphatic that everyone knows of it and the present generation is up in arms against it. Solomon advised the use of the rod; he regarded children as born outside of Eden and bringing forth folly as the ground brings forth weeds. “Spare the rod and spoil the child” is a saying known to everyone. Solomon was even more definite. He declared that a man who spared the rod hated his son. It is hardly possible to think of anything more emphatic.

In interpreting “the dark sayings of the wise”, however, we must not always insist on the literal even where the literal could easily be applied. No one would take this reference to hatred in a literal sense, for it is quite certain that a destructive leniency is usually the expression of a genuine but foolish love. The saying means that the effect of parental weakness is so bad that it is akin to hatred in its effects even though love is the cause of it. The saying is intelligible and forceful but not strictly literal. Why then insist on nothing but an actual rod and physical pain in the other part of the saying ? Correction may be made by word and look and in a hundred different manipulations of circumstances, some of which may be more effective than the rod, although even that may sometimes be necessary.

One of the sayings of Solomon seems exactly to express this idea. We should paraphrase it in this manner in modern speech. “Correct and chasten your son when he needs it and do not be put off by the fuss he makes, for even if you find it necessary to use the rod it will not kill him.” (“If thou beatest him with the rod he shall not die.”)

This has become a very unpopular doctrine in our days. The modern idea seems to be that children should be left to “express themselves” without the cramping effect of correction either by word or rod. The result is often a personal monstrosity as hideous as the creations of modern artists who with a similar disregard of the old rules try to express themselves in their art.

There are signs now that a reaction is setting in. A magistrate recently made the confession that the children’s court is a complete farce. Boys can stand plenty of lecturing and be amused by it. Most of those who are brought to the children’s court have already been ruined by the negligence of their parents. They will not be reformed by the belated advice of magistrates and missionaries.

The doctrine of Solomon is that foolishness is bound up in the heart of a child, but the rod of correction will drive it away. We must train the twig while it is quite young and then there will be hope of it developing aright when it is older and less tractable. If we neglect this educational work for our children we are playing the part of an enemy and the effect will be like that of an enemy’s hatred and not of a parent’s love. This is very wise instruction however unpopular it may be in our time.

Here again we must not insist on a too literal and complete application of the proverbial teaching. “Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it” is a statement of general tendencies and not of an inexorable law. Human beings are neither machines nor plants. They have a power of choice; they can respond to good influences or they can be rebellious. Some very good men have had a bad early training and some very bad men were given every opportunity in the instruction of their early days. One of the surprising discoveries made by each successive generation is that children differ from the very cradle. We can remember many years ago two families beginning family life at about the same time. The advent of the first baby had very different effects in the two homes. One home remained placid and well ordered; the child was brought up according to the book of rules and apparently without protest. The parents went to meetings and carried on with all their former duties. The other home was so disorganized by the arrival of the firstborn that it might have been smitten by an earthquake. The parents never dared to take the baby to a meeting and often were not able to get there themselves. The happy and placid parents with the well-ordered child looked askance at this dislocated home. They were more censorious than sympathetic. If they pitied the unfortunate pair it is to be feared that the pity was more akin to pride than to love. “Those unfortunate people simply do not know how to bring up a child. Look at the way we do it.” Then nemesis visited the complacent pair in the form of another child, and they in their turn made the discovery that babies differ. The second child knew nothing about the scientific book and did not want to know. He or she had come to make a stir in the world and apparently believed in the virtues of an early start. Thus unkind criticisms were appropriately rebuked and another of life’s lessons was painfully learned.

Yet although there are these great individual differences the general principle laid down by the wise man holds true. Folly is in the heart of a child, all need correction and guidance. We cannot be certain that success will attend our efforts, but we can be quite certain that we are right in trying to correct and instruct our children. The early training is the most important part of human education.

In all these matters “wisdom is profitable to direct”. Children need very different treatment if all are to have a good start in life. Herein lies the folly of those idealistic reformers who talk of all being given “an equal chance”. The wisest father in the land cannot be sure of giving that equal chance even to his own children, so there is not much hope of officials being successful with the children of other people.

There are some horses that will put on their best pace at the mere sound of the whip, while on the other hand we have known an old pony to stop by the wayside and begin to eat grass while the angry driver was thrashing him. Similarly there are children who are pained and perhaps made ill by a single sharp word, while there are others who will take a wicked delight in seeing how far they can trespass without endangering their little skins. To treat them all alike is criminal folly. In all cases the rod of correction is needed but many different kinds of rod can be used. The sensitive and quickly responsive child should be treated gently, while the other type should be taught that physical pain may follow too quickly on the heels of reproof to admit of any safe experiments in rebellion. Reason should be used with all types as soon as ever it is possible. Even the boy who has been most troublesome in his earliest days may with growing intelligence prove so amenable to reason that he becomes tractable just at the age when more placid children are becoming awkward.

When children reach the age of reasonable response the duties of parents increase rather than diminish. There is the world to face with all its pitfalls. Some of the great decisions of life have to be made. There are children who have been almost ruined in their early teens or even earlier than that. There are parents who seem to think that it is well to allow the problem of good and evil to be expounded by the progeny of the serpent. They leave some of the most important mysteries of life to be explained by the worst companions the children ever meet. A moral indolence is the cause of this evil.

The establishment of parental authority and the maintenance of a proper respect will be mainly through the wise handling of the little events of life. Ordinary human experience is made up of small incidents which are of little importance in themselves but which can have great effects for good or ill in the development of character and in the establishment of right conditions for greater issues. Many parents fail in these ordinary trials through making a feeble surrender of their own laws. A wise father once gave this excellent and terse advice to a mother. “First cut out about ninety per cent of your prohibitions, and then rigidly enforce those that remain.” The principal difficulty in this matter — in fact nearly the whole of the difficulty — is in the early stages. Children are quick to detect signs of weakness, and if parents try to prohibit nearly everything and then weakly give way if there is sufficient protest, the children soon learn how to gain their ends and they rapidly develop the diabolism that is within them. On the other hand, if they learn that “No” means “No”, and that whining expostulations bring punishment instead of reward, they soon learn to make the best of the ample liberty allowed to them; they cease even to seek after forbidden things and they learn the lesson of obedience. Incidentally, we may remark that they are much happier than the whiners as well as being much pleasanter.

It should go without saying that if parents desire to have well behaved and well trained children, they must not be like petulant children themselves. If they desire a reasonable and consistent recognition of parental authority, they must be reasonable and consistent in framing their rules. If parents give way to temper and temperament, if rules depend upon the mood of the moment so that a transgression may be a crime or a joke according to the condition of the parental liver, they cannot reasonably expect that the children will feel any genuine respect for them.

If fathers hold aloof, they ought not to be surprised if they fail to gain the children’s confidence. If they pretend to maintain a rigid asceticism which is far removed from their actual behaviour they need not be surprised to lose the children’s respect, for it is almost certain that the breach between theory and practice will be observed by the rising generation. More than one father in the Brotherhood with puritanic zeal has confiscated the boy’s books, condemning them as “rubbish”, and then has been caught reading them himself with evident enjoyment. The discovery of his weakness has never been mentioned to him, but others have heard of it and probably he has observed and deplored his loss of influence without ever knowing the cause. If fathers ever read the children’s books, let them do it openly: then they may be able to lead the young mind to better things, able to guide as they command respect.

We are living in days of unusual freedom in the home. Young people sometimes speak to their parents in a way that would have shocked a former generation, but we are not at all sure that the change is for the worse. Sometimes in these days a very genuine and respectful love is concealed by apparently disrespectful words. In former days sometimes disrespect and resentment were concealed by hypocritical words of deference. There can be no question as to which we should prefer of these two possibilities. Companionship between parents and children is certainly good. Children often come to have more knowledge and they may even be wiser than their parents, but if there has been a reasonable companionship there is still the respect due to age and the influence that is born of love.

There are many passages in the Book of Proverbs which might be taken in a personal sense as the instruction of a very wise father to a well-beloved son. May we not reasonably take them as from the Father in Heaven to children who may be old according to human standards but who still need much guidance ?

“My son, if thou wilt receive my words. My son, forget not my law… My son, despise not the chastening of the Lord… Hear, my son, the instruction of a father… My son, attend unto my wisdom.”

As with the natural father and son, love is the ruling principle both in giving and receiving instruction. The establishment of a law for mankind was an expression of divine love. The love of God will constrain us in our response. Perhaps even on this highest plane there is an application of the saying that “a wise son maketh a glad father.” It is written that in the affliction of Israel God was afflicted, and the Apostle says, “Grieve not the Holy Spirit of God.” On the other hand we have the statements that God was well pleased with the Lord Jesus, that He is well pleased with the sacrifices of praise and obedience. Indeed, we are told that this is the ultimate object of creation.

If we can thus apply the personal language of the Proverbs and as sons and daughters make a response ruled by that reverential fear which goes hand in hand with love, we may find a very moving influence in these appeals to “my son.”

(PrPr 156-163).

Prov, wise and fool in

ChristadelphianBooksOnline The Agora Bible Articles and Lessons: P-Q

Wise hears and responds: Pro 1:5; 8:33; 9:8,9; 10:8; 12:15; 13:1; 15:31; 17:10; 18:15; 19:20; 21:11; 23:19. (Examples: Samuel, Eli in 1Sa 1; 2; 3.) The fool does not hear, does not act upon what he is told: Pro 10:8; 15:5; 18:2; 23:9. (Example: Saul in 1Sa 13.)

Wise is slow to express opinion or show anger: Pro 10:19; 11:12; 12:16,23; 17:28; 29:8,11. (Example: Abigail in 2Sa 25.) Fool is quick to speak and express anger: Pro 11:12; 12:16,23; 14:16,17; 18:6; 20:3; 29:11,20. (Example: Nabal in 2Sa 25.)

Wise shows humility: Pro 11:2; 12:15. (Example: apostles in Act 12.) Fool is proud: Pro 3:7; 11:2; 12:15; 26:12; 28:26; 30:32. (Example: Herod in Act 12.)

Wise works hard and is industrious: Pro 6:6-8; 10:5; 21:20; 31:10-31. Fool is lazy: Pro 1:32; 6:9-11; 26:10,16.

Wise is friend of other wise people: Pro 13:20; 14:7. (Example: Jehoshaphat in 2Ch 17:3-9.) Fool is friend of other foolish people: Pro 7:6-23 (v22 mg); Pro 13:20. (Example: Jehoshaphat in 2Ch 20:31-37.)

Wise shows restraint in pursuit of wealth: Pro 23:4. Fool shows no restraint and acts in a disgusting way when he acquires wealth: Pro 17:16,24; 19:10; 30:21,22. (Examples of both — ie before and after: Matthew and Zacchaeus.)

Psa 133, exhortation

ChristadelphianBooksOnline The Agora Bible Articles and Lessons: P-Q

Here is the perfect picture of unity — a DIVINE UNITY: the sharing of the blessings of God, poured out in love upon us all. How foolish to suppose that Biblical fellowship can be enjoyed by those who do not share the blessing of a common hope! But how foolish also to suppose that God views favorably any division among those who, despite minor differences, do share a common hope!

This psalm might well bear the title: “The Descent of Divine Blessings”. The repetition of this word “descend” is obscured in the AV because, oddly enough, its three occurrences are translated three different ways: “ran down” and “went down” as well as “descended”. But mark its uses here, and then we may follow the lovely refrain:

“Unity is like the precious ointment that DESCENDED upon Aaron’s beard; Yea, that DESCENDED even to his skirts; Even like the dew of mount Hermon that DESCENDED upon Zion.”

Through this refrain, as with the gently descending rains of summer, our Father seeks to cleanse our hearts of all pride and boasting. He seeks to refresh in our minds the principle that our unity is derived from above (descending from God), and is not the product of our own labors. Surely James had this in mind when he wrote of “the wisdom that is from above… pure, peaceable, gentle, easy to be entreated, full of mercy… and the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace” (Jam 3:17,18).

“Can it be a question whether brethren should from conflict cease?” Truly unity — with God at the center — leads inevitably to righteousness, peace of mind, and the solution of those perplexing tangles in which Christ’s brethren, as they execute their duties, so often find themselves.

“Behold how good and how pleasant…” It is not simply good (right and proper) that we dwell together in unity. It is also pleasant (exceedingly delightful) that we do so. The appeal of Abraham to his kinsman Lot might as well be an exhortation to us: “Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between me and thee… for we be brethren” (Gen 13:8). It should be enough to encourage our endeavors in the direction of unity, if only it were right in God’s sight. But the “icing on the cake” is that it is superlatively delightful as well. There is no state on earth to match this dwelling together in “the unity of the Spirit” (Eph 4:3) — with shared feelings and purposes — whether it be as husband and wife, or as an entire family, or in the larger “family” of the ecclesia.

The brethren of Christ “dwell together”. This does not mean that they merely meet and socialize a little before and after ecclesial functions. This means instead a continuing together, in the closest communion. As David exhorted the men of Judah, “Ye are my brethren, ye are my bones and my flesh” (2Sa 19:12). And if other duties or infirmities or distances make this personal “dwelling together” impractical, then we still have recourse to thought and prayer for one another as a means of achieving this union.

The goal, the focal point of our unity, is mount Zion and her king. We could have no unity but for Christ and the promises. This Psa 133 is one of the fifteen “Songs of Degrees”. These glorious songs are centered in the worship of the Lord in His temple, and are in part prophetic of the kingdom age. They are also called “Pilgrim Songs” and “Songs of Ascents” — because they appear to have been composed with those in mind who journey upward to worship the Lord of Hosts in the elevated mount Zion.

And so we find the expression of our unity in the ascending of our common petitions and the descending of our common blessings. True brethren of Christ are united in one hope, one need, and one experience. Unity with Christ is intimately bound up with unity with our brethren. We cannot have one without the other.

“Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me” (Mat 25:40).

But when we exalt ourselves above our brethren then we do what our Lord and Saviour would not do; we displease him; and we endanger our own oneness in the “Body of Christ”.

We must now examine the beautiful comparisons of this Divine unity: first, the holy anointing oil of Aaron (Psa 133:2), with which the tabernacle and its furniture were also anointed (Exo 30:23-33).

This anointing served as the consecration of God’s priests, empowering them to fulfill the duties of their office. All priests were anointed, but the high priest received a great abundance, an overflowing “to the skirts of his garments”. The anointing oil was an expression of God’s love in His ordinances: its “pouring out” prompts the “virgins” to love Him (Song 1:3). The anointing of Aaron pointed forward to that of Christ — “with the oil of gladness above his fellows” (Psa 45:7). Christ has received a greater glory and a greater strength, so that he might be a perfect High Priest to us his brethren.

The “oil” descended first and in greater measure upon the head, Christ, and then descended to the skirts of his garments, his “Body” as well! God’s special provision of a Son in whom we might be reconciled to Him (2Co 5:21) calls forth this picture of oil covering, not just the head, but the whole body! None of us is the head, only Christ. A realization of this simple fact would curtail most ecclesial wrangling and self-seeking. Our unity is that each of us is an integral part of the one, undivided “body of Christ” (1Co 12). All of the body shares the blessings that came through the special anointing of the head. It is not the believers who make this unity possible, for Christ has already done so. Neither do we earn our place in “fellowship” around the table of the Lord. We merely accept it, and rejoice in the blessings it affords. Our righteousness is not our own, but his that called us. Our unity is based upon our abject humility and our sincere acceptance of our subordinate and dependent position.

Finally, in v 3, we are called upon to consider the descending dew of Hermon as an allegory of our unity. The anointing oil has brought to our minds the death of Christ (“for in that she hath poured this ointment on my body, she did it for my burial” — Mat 26:12). Here, the dew stands foremost as a symbol of resurrection (his, and ours in prospect) — completing the cycle.

Hermon is a range of three peaks which dominates the northern parts of Israel, and which is visible over the entire Land. Because of its great height, Hermon is covered with snow most of the year. In late summer this snow begins to melt, the runoff feeding reservoirs and springs to supply water to the thirsty lands of the south.

The obvious and intended symbolism of Hermon is that of the Divine Blessing, stored up in the providence of God until the proper time, when it is most needed. We can read v 3 by omitting the phrase beginning with “and” which is in italics. Thus: “As the dew of Hermon that descended upon the mountains of Zion…” It is the same dew although the two areas are over 100 miles apart: Observers say that the breezes that blow from the north across the snow-covered face of Hermon bring cooling moisture as far south as Jerusalem. (Perhaps it is this very phenomenon which called forth the description of a faithful messenger — “as the cold of snow in the time of harvest”: Pro 25:13.)

The dew comes as God’s blessing during the hottest part of the year. We are told the king’s favor is as dew upon the ground (Pro 19:12), and especially upon the hallowed ground of Zion (Bible symbol of the unified body of saints: Heb 12:22; Rev 14:1). The “manna” of God — the bread of His blessing that descended each day — was said to come as the dew falling upon the ground (Num. 11:9), emblem of the unfailing compassions of God for His people, renewed each morning (Lam 3:22,23).

“For there [upon the mountains of Zion] the Lord commanded the blessing, even life for evermore.” Finally, and most important, the dew portrays the saints on the glorious resurrection morn: “O dwellers in the dust, awake and sing for joy! For thy dew is a dew of light” (Isa 26:19, RSV)… the first rays of the “Sun” revealing a glorious spectacle of reflected light, dancing upon the grass: “From the womb of the morning like dew your youth will come to you” (Psa 110:3, RSV).

In that greatest of all days the Lord will achieve that perfect unity of which our assemblies are only a shadow. A great multitude, which no man can number, born in a day, silently, irresistibly, as the dew of heaven. Such is the picture of the development of the body of Christ, a multiplicity and yet a unity, appearing all together for the first time.

In the memorials which we receive each Sunday we have the reason for our unity. We have the “bread which strengtheneth man’s heart” (Psa 104:15) and the “wine that maketh glad the heart of man”. The strength and joy of a renewed life through Christ come from above. They descend upon us as the precious anointing oil, as the dew upon the earth beneath; and all we need do is stretch forth our hands and hearts to receive the eternal bounty of God’s inexhaustible store.

Let us draw together in this, the true unity of shared blessings. Let us look upon each of our brothers and sisters with deeper understanding. We are all of us, collectively and individually, those “for whom Christ died”. Let us be silent and reverent as we stand with our brethren and mingle our prayers like incense on the altar before the throne of heaven. We have come into the miraculous presence of God’s grace. It is His mercy alone that has brought each of us to share the oil of healing and the dew of refreshing, the bread of strengthening and the wine of joy. In the loving provision of His Son, the all-powerful, self-existent Lord of all being has commanded the blessing of life for evermore; and none can turn aside His decree.

May we grasp and cherish that bright hope, and lead lives worthy of the Saviour who loved us all. May the contemplation of that awesome work, the reconciliation of sinners to God, transform our minds in the understanding and practice of true Biblical fellowship. And may we now — and forever — “dwell together in unity” under the shadow of His love.

Psa 22, overview

ChristadelphianBooksOnline The Agora Bible Articles and Lessons: P-Q

  • Vv 1-21: The victim, his sufferings, and his enemies… or, the sufferings of Christ.

  • Vv 22-31: The God-glorifying outcome of this tribulation… or, the glory that should follow.

HISTORICAL SETTING: Possibly David’s sickness and bitter experiences at the time of Absalom’s rebellion. Peter offers the inspired commentary (on other of David’s psalms) that “David, being a prophet and knowing….he seeing this before, spake of the resurrection of Christ” (Act 2:30,31). And, again, “David speaketh concerning him…” (Act 2:25). So perhaps Psa 22 should be considered as in a relatively special category, of prophetic vision by David, having little if anything to do with his own experiences.

RECITED ON THE CROSS?: This psalm, recited in full on the cross, was one of the great solaces of the suffering and dying Messiah:

  1. V 8 was quoted by the men who had condemned Jesus, thrown at him in scorn! Irony: they quickened his tiring mind to a Scripture uniquely appropriate to all his circumstances. Thus, all unsuspecting, his enemies brought wonderful reinforcement to his failing spirit. And how these evil men would be startled when he took up their blasphemous use of Holy Scripture and identified himself with the whole psalm, from beginning to end.

  2. Jesus certainly quoted v 1, in a slightly modified form (Mat 27:46; Mar 15:34).

  3. “It is finished” (Joh 19:30) is the exact equivalent of “He hath done this” (Psa 22:31).

  4. Joh 19:28 has been often misread: “….that the scripture might be fulfilled, [he] saith, I thirst.” To assert that Jesus said “I thirst” just to fulfill one small prophecy (Psa 22:15) as the only one which he had not yet fulfilled, is a trivialization of Scripture. Here the word “fulfilled” is not the normal word for the fulfillment of prophecy (not, for example, the same as in Joh 19:24,36); its meaning is: “that the scripture might be finished…(ended, or completed)”. Jesus was reciting the psalm, but was too parched to go on, and at v 15 (“My tongue cleaveth to my jaws”) he desperately needed a drink, and having received it, he was able to go on to the end (“It is finished”), spoken with head uplifted.

  5. When Jesus said: “Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani,” why should Jews standing by (they could not possibly have been Romans) mistakenly think that he was calling for Elijah? Could Eli really be mistaken for Eli-yahu? But if they heard Jesus recite v 8 (“He trusted on the Lord, and he will deliver him”), the Heb of that phrase is virtually an echo of “Eli-yahu.” Hence: “Let us see whether Elijah (Eli-yahu) will come to save (deliver) him.”

PSALM 22 IN ITS LARGER CONTEXT:

(1) The cross of Christ:

  • Psa 22: The cross from Messiah’s viewpoint

  • Isa 53: The cross from our viewpoint

(2) Christ our shepherd:

  • Psa 22: The Good Shepherd in death (The Past) (“I lay down my life”: Joh 10:11,15).

  • Psa 23: The Great Shepherd in resurrection (The Present) (“Lo, I am with you always”: Mat 28:20).

  • Psa 24: The Chief Shepherd in glory (The Future) (“Come, ye blessed of my Father”: Mat 25:34).

(3) Christ our sacrifice:

  • Psa 22: The perfect Sin-offering

  • Psa 40: The perfect Burnt-offering

  • Psa 69: The perfect Trespass-offering

Psalm structure

ChristadelphianBooksOnline The Agora Bible Articles and Lessons: P-Q

Most psalms consist of 3 parts: a superscription, the song itself, and a subscription. Perfect examples of this order may be seen in Hab 3:1-19 and Isa 38:9-20; in these places the psalm is isolated from other psalms — so there is no question to which psalm the superscription and subscription belong.

The Hebrew text of the Psalms carries no distinctive breaks between the psalms, only a number in the margin; and in the AV translation the mistake was often made of placing the musical direction at the beginning of the next psalm, instead of at the end of the preceding psalm. Consider Psa 68: The superscription is “a Psalm or song of David”. (“To the chief musician” belongs to 67.) The subscription is “To the chief musician upon Shoshannim”. (“A Psalm of David” belongs to 69.)

A good general rule is that the historical or other introduction belongs to the psalm following it; the musical instruction often appearing at the beginning of a psalm is properly the subscription to the previous psalm.

“The so-called musical titles have come down to us, alike in the Massoretic recension of the Hebrew text (copies c AD 900) and in the Greek and other early versions (codices dating c AD 400) in a form that has, even to the present day, caused great confusion. Yet all down the ages, the Canonical Scriptures have supplied us a psalm, which, standing by itself, claimed to be studied as a model in all its various features, literary and musical. That psalm appears in Hab 3…” (JWT).

Psalms and Pentateuch

ChristadelphianBooksOnline The Agora Bible Articles and Lessons: P-Q

The Psalms are divisible into 5 books, answering to the 5 books of Moses:

BOOK PSALMS COMMENTS
Book 1 1-41 Genesis: concerning man and his relationship to God. All blessing is bound up in obedience. Closes with a Benediction and a double Amen.
Book 2 42-72 Exodus: concerning Israel as a nation. The counsels of God concerning Israel’s ruin, redeemer, and redemption. Closes with a Benediction and a double Amen.
Book 3 73-89 Leviticus: concerning God’s sanctuary. Closes with a Benediction and a double Amen.
Book 4 90-106 Numbers: concerning Israel in relation to the nations. Closes with a Benediction, Amen, and Hallelujah.
Book 5 107-150 Deuteronomy: concerning God and His Word. Closes with 5 psalms, each beginning and ending with “Hallelujah”.

The last 5 psalms may be seen as an echo of the whole of the five books:

  • Psa 146/Genesis: cp v 4 with Gen 2:7; v 5 with 2:8; v 6 with Gen 1.

  • Psa 147/Exodus: cp v 4 with Exo 1:1; vv 2-20 with Exo 1:7-10.

  • Psa 148/Leviticus: cp v 14 with Lev 10:3.

  • Psa 149/Numbers: cp vv 5-9 with Num 14:21; 24:17-24.

  • Psa 150/Deuteronomy: cp v 2 with Deu 3:24.

The ancient Jewish Sabbath worship incorporated the reading of a portion of the Pentateuch, so that over a 3-year period the whole was covered. A related psalm at the close of each Sabbath service?

It is said that the reading of Gen ended on the 41st Sabbath, Exodus on the 72nd, Lev on the 89th, Num on the 116th, and Deut on the 144th. The 12 extra Sabbaths in a 3-year period [(3 x 52) – 144] were possibly related to the intercalary month (a sort of “leap-year” arrangement by which a 13th month was added periodically to the Jewish calendar). Possible special readings (the final 5 psalms, perhaps) occupied those Sabbaths.

There is then a remarkable association between the Pentateuch and the Psalms, suggesting a plausible reason for the division of the Psalms into 5 books. A reason, also, for the inclusion in the Psalms of almost identical psalms (14 and 53, for example): the same psalm was only very slightly modified for use in 2 different collections.

Psalms of the Sanctuary

ChristadelphianBooksOnline The Agora Bible Articles and Lessons: P-Q

“In the beginning”

The purpose of Yahweh may be summarized in the Hebrew titles of the first five books of the Bible. It is not generally known that the titles in our English Bible are based upon the Greek Septuagint; they bear little or no resemblance to the Hebrew titles. Consider the summary below:

English title Hebrew title Translation
1. Genesis “Bereshith” “In the beginning”
2. Exodus “Ve-elleh shemoth” “These (are) the names”
3. Leviticus “Vayyikra” “He (Yahweh) called”
4. Numbers “Be-midbar” “In the wilderness”
5. Deuteronomy “Haddebarim” “These (are) the words”

In each of the above cases, the Hebrew title is the first word or phrase of the book — which serves as a keynote of its message. Carrying the observation one step further, we notice that the five titles, taken in order and supplying the ellipsis, also provide a message. Almost as poetry, they speak eloquently of the Deity and His comprehensive purpose, as Creator, Lawgiver, and Saviour of the world:

“In the beginning these were the names which Yahweh called. In the wilderness these were the words (which Yahweh spoke).”

“He called”

Let us concentrate on Moses’ third book: Here we find a proclamation of God’s purpose with those whom He has called. “I will be glorified… I will be sanctified in those who approach Me!” This is the main theme of Leviticus: God’s sanctuary among men. God has proposed to erect a “house”, in which He may be sanctified. A “house”, Scripturally speaking, may be either a building or a family. But we think most often of the latter, for we realize that God may be worshipped anywhere — He needs not temples made with men’s hands (Acts 7:48).

Wherever, Lord, Thy people meet, There they behold Thy mercy seat; Where’er they seek Thee, Thou art found, And every place is hallowed ground.”

Thus, when we consider God’s Sanctuary and those who are called to it, we perceive that spiritual sanctification is more Important than physical sanctification — even as our Lord said, “Be ye holy… be ye perfect…”

This rather forbidding book of Leviticus is not a “dead letter”. It has a universal spiritual appeal, to those of all times who constitute the living sanctuary. God has called us all “out of Egypt” and built us up into a spiritual house in the wilderness, having through His Son set us an example of holiness and perfection.

The “Leviticus” Book of Psalms

The Hebrew Psalter is divided into five books, corresponding to the five books of the Pentateuch. Each “book” ends with a benediction, or blessing (41:13; 72:18,19; 89:52; 118:28,29; all of 150). By ancient Hebrew tradition, Leviticus was divided into seventeen Sabbath synagogue readings; the third book of Psalms (Psa 73 through Psa 89) consists of seventeen Psalms. There are strikingly similar arrangements in the other four pairs of Mosaic books and Psalms sections. (For detail, consult The Companion Bible, by Bullinger.)

Ten is the number of ordinal (numerical) perfection; seven, spiritual perfection and God’s covenant. The sum of the two represents a perfection of spiritual order in God’s covenant. In seventeen we see the “beauty of holiness”, the “glory and beauty” of God’s sanctuary, where all services are conducted “decently and in order” (1Co 14:40).

In almost every psalm of the seventeen, the sanctuary or the holy Place or the holy congregation is mentioned. The titles in this section refer to Asaph, Heman, and Ethan (the three “chief musicians” or choir directors) and the “sons of Korah” (doorkeepers in the tabernacle and temple — 1Ch 9:19; Psa 84:10). The three directors stood officially “according to their order” (1Ch 6:32):

Left (1Ch 6:44) Center (1Ch 6:33) Right (1Ch 6:39)
Ethan (Psa 89) or Jeduthun (Psa 76) Heman (Psa 88) Asaph (Psa 73–83)
Of Merari Of Kohath Of Gershom

The group led by each man would play and sing its special hymns in the service of the tabernacle and the temple — a perfection of spiritual order.

The Sanctuary of Yahweh

Certain themes emerge from these “Psalms of the Sanctuary”, which demonstrate the relevance of Leviticus and the sanctuary to our day:

Psalm 73: Yahweh’s sanctuary is the place of enlightenment, a lampstand shining in a dark and frightful world:

“For I was envious at the wicked… until I went into the sanctuary of God; then I understood their end.”

Psalms 74; 79: The enemy is currently enthroned in Yahweh’s sanctuary (Jerusalem and indeed all the earth), and the righteous remnant mourn and pray:

“Thine enemies roar in the midst of the congregation… Thy holy temple have they defiled… How long, Yahweh?”

Psalms 75; 76: But finally Yahweh will arise to cleanse His sanctuary: “God is the judge… in Salem also is His tabernacle, and His dwelling place in Zion… the earth feared and was still, when God arose to judgment…”

Psalms 80; 82: The people of Yahweh are the true and living sanctuary, built up around Christ, the ultimate sanctuary whom the Father strengthened for Himself (Psa 80:15,17):

“God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; He judgeth among the gods.”

Psalms 83; 84: The tents of wickedness will eventually fall, but the sanctuary of Yahweh will stand firm:

“I had rather be a doorkeeper in the house of my God, than to dwell in the tents of wickedness.”

Psalms 87; 89: Only one birth is of consequence, and that is the birth, or rebirth, in the sanctuary of Zion:

“Yahweh shall reckon, when He enrolls the people, that this man was born there… in the congregation and assembly of the saints…”

Psalms, “Hallelujah”

ChristadelphianBooksOnline The Agora Bible Articles and Lessons: P-Q

THE HALLELUJAH PSALMS

Twelve “Hallelujah” psalms: ie psalms beginning and ending with “Praise Yahweh”:

  • 104: Double-“Hallelujah” psalms.

  • 105: Borrowing the second “Hallelujah” from end of Psa 104 (which leaves 104 beginning and ending with “Bless the Lord, O my soul”).

  • 106: Double “Hallelujah”.

  • 111: Has double “Hallelujah” by borrowing a “Hallelujah” from beginning of 112. (This is appropriate, since 111 is about the character of God, while 112 is about the character of a man.)

  • 116: Has double “Hallelujah” by borrowing a “Hallelujah” from end of 115. (There is no superscription to mark the proper point of division.)

  • 117: Double “Hallelujah”: The divine name appears in full: “Hallelu (eth) Y’howah”.

  • 135/146/147/148/149/150: Six more double-“Hallelujah” psalms.

Psalms, “Maschil”

ChristadelphianBooksOnline The Agora Bible Articles and Lessons: P-Q

There are 13 “Maschil” psalms: 32, 42, 44, 45, 52-55, 74, 78, 88, 89, and 142. “Maschil” means ‘causing to understand’. Practically equivalent to ‘explanation’. Three times the Passover law laid it upon the head of each household to explain what the purpose of the feast was and is (Exo 12:26,27; 13:8,9,14-16). The purpose behind this commemoration must be kept fresh and clear in the minds of succeeding generations. A similar practice was followed regarding other feasts of the Lord. The same word is used about the reading of the Law at the Feast of Trumpets (Neh 8:1,7). Essentially the same word describes how Hezekiah “prospered” (2Ki 18:7). Also, “Hezekiah spoke to the minds of all the Levites that taught (“ha-maskilim”) the good knowledge of the LORD” at this great Passover (2Ch 30:22).