“Rejoice in tribulations”

“We glory in tribulations,” writes the apostle Paul (Rom 5:3). The word “glory” is the same in the Greek as the word translated “rejoice” in v 2 and “joy” in v 11. Paul can rejoice in tribulations, or “sufferings” (RSV), because those sufferings are part of a process leading to the glory of God (vv 2,11).

This same principle is taught by James:

“My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations (‘various trials’: RSV)… Blessed is the man that endureth temptation (‘trial’: RSV): for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life” (1:2,12).

And also by Peter:

“Now for a season… ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations (again, ‘various trials’: RSV): that the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ” (1Pe 1:6,7).

All of the above is based upon the words of Christ:

“Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven… Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven” (Mat 5:10,12).

What does the phrase “for righteousness’ sake” mean? Whose righteousness, Christ’s or ours? Certainly the former, in view of v 11, where the corresponding phrase is, “for my sake”. This reminds us of the reaction of the apostles to their beating at the instigation of the Sanhedrin: they rejoiced “that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for his name” (Acts 5:40,41).

We must accept our tribulations not just because they are the common lot of all mankind, but rather in order to fill up, or complete, what is lacking in the sufferings of Christ (Col 1:24). We suffer because he suffered, and because we are members along with “the Head” of the same “body”! Without our trials, therefore, Christ’s work would be incomplete and, strange as it may sound, imperfect. This is all part of Christ’s being a representative, and not merely a substitutionary, sacrifice. His trials are a standing invitation to us to view our lives as complements of his, and in so doing to have fellowship with his sufferings (Phi 3:8-11).

Paul writes to the Corinthian brethren that sufferings go hand in hand with consolation (or comfort: RSV) (2Co 1:3-7). Only those who have themselves suffered can effectively offer true and acceptable “consolation” to others who suffer — this is why Job’s friends failed: Job’s intense sufferings, and the anguished questions they produced, were completely foreign to their own experiences.

Paul also writes, in the same place, that we must suffer in order to learn the lesson that we should not trust in ourselves, but in God Who raises the dead (vv 8,9). Our weaknesses and failures, paradoxical as it may seem, draw us closer to a God Who is all-powerful and Who never fails.

If, then, we suffer because Christ suffered and we must follow his lead, we are still left with the question: Why did Christ suffer? The Scriptural answer, again supplied by Paul, is that he learned obedience and was made perfect through his sufferings (Heb 5:2,7-9). He was not born perfect, but he became perfect. “Perfect” In this instance means more than sinless; it means tried and faithful. A perfect character can be developed only through trials, or — in more modern terms — a decision-making process. This process, also called “chastening”, is not essentially a pleasant process; but it is, Biblically speaking, “joyful” when the end of the chastening — the perfection or completion of character — is considered (Heb 12:11).

Character is formed under storm clouds, not under sunny skies. Saints learn more from their “losses” than their “profits”. Health comes out of sickness. God’s strength is perfected in human weakness; and the flesh’s failures become the Spirit’s successes!

“For even Christ pleased not himself” (Rom 15:3). Then why should we “please” ourselves? And why should God always do those things that “please” us, on a superficial, temporal level?

The fellowship of Christ is not a peaceful walk through a beautiful garden, despite what some sentimental “orthodox” hymns would have us believe. It is instead a “fellowship of suffering”. Instead of relaxation, it is self-sacrifice. Associations may have to be surrendered (Mat 10:32-38). Ambitions may have to be set aside. Pleasures may have to be foregone.

The verses concerning persecution from the “Sermon on the Mount” (Mat 5:10-12), quoted earlier, come at the end of the “Beatitudes”. This is the final “blessing”; why? Because all the previous seven “blessings” lead up to it. Christ was all these other things — poor in spirit, meek, merciful, pure in heart, a peacemaker. It was because he was all these other things that he was finally persecuted, and hounded to his death! Me would naturally expect that the fine qualities of Mat 5:3-9 would lead all the world to admire him. But no — much the reverse! The world came at last to hate the man who by his actions and words testified against their sins, and they rose up to crucify him.

Could it be, then, that we do not suffer in the degree that Christ did because we do not really “show forth” Christ and his death to the world around us? Perhaps, if we did demonstrate our oneness with him in word and deed, society would not welcome us with open arms — but would instead accord us similar treatment.

Do we fail to experience real sufferings because, like the Laodicean ecclesia, we have become too “comfortable” in this world (Rev 3:17)? Part of Christ’s “sufferings” had to do with his attitude toward the world. He saw the world, rightly, as a barren wasteland where there was no water of life, and no hope. And so he “suffered”, not just physically but mentally, because he was forced to live among wicked men. Do we see our lives in this wicked world as a suffering? Or do we see, all around us, lots of pleasant worldly diversions and entertainment? If so, then we have succumbed, in large measure or altogether, to the cares of the world, the deceitfulness of riches, and the lusts of the flesh.

Severe persecutions and sufferings may come our way before the return of Christ. Certain prophecies seem to point in that direction. If they do come, they will be by the mercy of God, to prepare our characters for His Kingdom; we need to be aware of this possibility, so as not to be offended and fall away. Will we have the spiritual strength to survive those coming trials? We will not if, during these generally peaceful and prosperous times (at least In our western world), we have been enjoying ourselves and growing lazy and complacent. We will survive whatever trials come if we use these same peaceful time? to give ourselves to Bible study, prayer, and hard work in the Truth.

It may be seen, therefore, that we do in fact have severe trials today! The relatively “easy” lives which we take for granted may be our greatest trial! Unless we are careful in our modern environment, our inner strength — the kind that had sustained our spiritual forefathers through difficult times-will rot away. And when the first blows of real outward tribulation fall upon us, we will crumble!

“And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: and the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house: and it fell: and great was the fall of it” (Mat 7:26,27).

Responsibility principles

Overall principles

  1. That ignorance excludes men from responsibility, but that they are responsible to divine judgment at the resurrection when they know the demand God makes upon them by Christ and the apostles, whether they submit to it or not: Psa 49:20; Act 17:30; Joh 3:19; 9:41; Jam 4:17; Mat 7:26; Rom 1:32; Mar 16:16; Luk 12:47; 1Ti 1:13; Joh 12:48; Deu 18:19.
  2. That the Scriptures recognize and teach that it is according to righteousness and justice that those who rebel against the light should be brought to punishment, even though they be “outside” or “without”: Rom 2:2,5; Heb 13:4; 1Co 5:13; Eph 2:3; 5:6; 2Co 5:11; Mat 12:32-36; Act 24:25; Mat 18:6-8; Joh 3:36; Rev 21:8.
  3. The responsible will be punished at the resurrectional judgment because they deserve it, not because of any technical compliance on their part: Heb 10:29; Rom 1:32; Luk 12:48; Heb 2:3; 12:23; 1Pe 4:18; Joh 5:30; Luk 10:12-15.
  4. The multitude who appear before the judgment seat of Christ will consist not only of the faithful and unfaithful members of his own immediate household, but of all who have refused to submit to the Law of God when reasonably attested: Mar 16:15,16; 2Co 2:15,16; Luk 19:27; Rom 1:18; 2:6,8,9,16; 2Th 1:10.

Quotations

“Those who come to an understanding of the gospel, but have rejected it… come forth from the grave again to encounter the burning indignation of Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom” (JT, “Revealed Mystery” 46).

“But illuminated sinners and ungodly Sardian saints are obnoxious to a perdition arrived at in different ways. These are they ‘who obey not the gospel of the Deity’ (1Pe 4:17), or disgrace it; and who come forth at the anastasis of judicial condemnation. These two classes are punished on the principle that ‘it is better not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the commandment delivered to them’ (2Pe 2:21)” (JT, “Anastasis”).

“But men are not only made, or constituted, sinners by the disobedience of Adam, but they become sinners, even as he, by actual transgression. Having obtained the maturity of their nature, they become accountable and responsible creatures. At this crisis, they may be placed by the divine arranging in relation to His Word, which becomes to them a tree of life (Pro 3:18), inviting them to ‘take and eat, and live forever’. If, however, they prefer to eat the world’s forbidden fruit, they come under the sentence of death in their own behalf. They are thus doubly condemned. They are ‘condemned already’ to dust as natural born sinners, and secondarily condemned to a resurrectional judgment, for rejecting the gospel of the kingdom of God, by which they become obnoxious to the ‘second death’ (Rev 20:14)” (JT, Elp 130,131).

“What is the second death? ‘Second’ implies a first… ‘It is appointed unto men once to die’ (Heb 9:27). A wicked man dies in the natural course of events; but, if amenable to judgment, he is raised again… to death a second time, but a death that is different from the first, inasmuch as it is directly inflicted by divine displeasure… ‘The day that cometh,’ said Malachi (Mal 4:1), ‘shall burn them up, and it shall leave them neither root nor branch.’ David’s declaration is that ‘the enemies of the Lord shall be as the fat of lambs; they shall consume; into smoke shall they consume away’ (Psa 37:20)” (RR, XdmAst, 164).

More detailed principle statements

  1. Light is invariably given as the ground and basis of responsibility to judgment. That is, all who know are accounted responsible: Joh 3:19; Jam 4:17; 2Pe 2:21; Joh 15:22; Mar 16:15,16; Rom 2:12-16; Amo 3:2; Gen 20:5,6; Acts 17:30.
  2. God has appointed a great day of giving account, a great Judgment Day, after life has ended. This is not to be minimized. If it were simply for deciding the results of probation, punishment for the baptized wicked would be unnecessary: Heb 9:27; 1Co 4:5; Act 17:31; Rom 2:12-16.
  3. Judgment in this life does not fulfill the Scripturally specialized requirements of the final, “giving account” judgment after death of Heb 9:27, etc: Rom 9:22; Psa 12:8; Job 12:6; Ecc 7:15; Psa 73; Ecc 12:14; Psa 37; Dan 4:17. Judgment in this life often falls upon one generation, although previous generations have been building up such offense: Gen 15:13-16; Mat 23:35,36; 2Ki 24:21.
  4. All must give account to God, except those specifically excluded by ignorance: Pro 21:16; Psa 49:20; Joh 5:28,29; 1Ti 1:13.
  5. The Scriptures never exclude the unbaptized from resurrectional judgment. Partially obedient and willfully disobedient are treated similarly.
  6. The expressions used by Scripture describing the rejected at the judgment seat never give any warrant for excluding any of the willfully or knowingly disobedient: Rom 2:5-16; Act 24:15; Joh 3:19,20; 5:28,29; Mar 16:16; Ecc 12:13,14; Job 21:30; Ecc 3:17; 2Th 1:7-10; 1Pe 4:3,17; Joh 12:46-48; Deu 18:18,19; Luk 12:9; Mar 8:38; Mat 12:32-36; Luk 19:27; Jud 1:15; Act 17:30,31; 2Co 5:10,11.
  7. Whenever we seek for a Bible definition of who shall come forth to a resurrectional condemnation, we find such terms as: the unjust, those who have done evil, the wicked, those who reject, deny, and refuse to listen, the disobedient, those who do not obey the truth, those who believe not when the gospel is preached, those who reject, etc.
  8. The Scriptures often speak with only the approved in mind: 1Th 4:16,17; 1Co 15; Mat 24:31.
  9. The Bible often speaks of resurrection in the sense of a process, including glorification: 1Co 15:42-44,51; Heb 11:35; Joh 5:29; Phi 3:8-11.
  10. “In Christ” is a moral — not a legal and mechanical — relationship: 1Co 15:22; Rom 8:9-11; 13:11-14; Eph 4:21-25; 1Co 4:17; Eph 1:1; Col 1:2; etc.
  11. The gospel call is a command, not merely an optional invitation: Act 17:30,31; Mar 16:15,16; Isa 8:6,7; Gen 1:16; Rom 1:5; 15:18; Act 10:48; 2Pe 2:21; 1Pe 1:22; 3:1; Rom 10:16.

See also Resurrectional responsibility

Resurrectional Responsibility

SF: “After his return, Jesus will raise many of the dead, the faithful and the unfaithful. He will also send forth his angels to gather them together with the living to the great judgment” (13). “The unfaithful will be punished with a second, eternal death. The faithful will be rewarded, by God’s grace, with everlasting life on the earth, receiving glorified and immortal bodies” (14).

BASF: “That at the appearing of Christ prior to the establishment of the Kingdom, the responsible (namely, those who know the revealed will of God, and have been called upon to submit to it), dead and living — obedient and disobedient — will be summoned before his judgment seat ‘to be judged according to their works’; and ‘receive in body according to what they have done, whether it be good or bad’ ” (XXIV).

“That the unfaithful will be consigned to shame and ‘the second death’, and the faithful, invested with immortality, and exalted to reign with Jesus as joint heirs of the kingdom, co-possessors of the earth, and joint administrators of God’s authority among men in everything” (XXV).

Like the original Birmingham Statement (before the Amendment of 1898), the ASF does not attempt to define the “responsible” — except to say, in Clause 14, that the “faithful” and “unfaithful” will appear at the Judgment Seat of Christ. This is equivalent to the BASF in XXV, which uses the identical words “faithful” and “unfaithful”. [For that matter, Clause XXIV of the BASF originally read: “the responsible (faithful and unfaithful), dead and living of both classes”. The parenthetical phrase was dropped out of the original Clause XXIV to make room for the parenthetical amendment.]

This ASF 14 is absolutely Biblical, being based upon a “first principles” passage (Act 24:15) which uses terms of identical meaning in defining those who are “responsible” to a resurrectional judgment:

“There shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust…” (KJV). “…the dead, both the righteous and the wicked…” (NIV). “…the dead, both the just and the unjust…” (RSV).

It is true that one early Christadelphian Statement of Faith (by John Thomas) seemed to limit the resurrectionally “responsible” to those of “the household” (see chapter 10). But surely the description “unjust” (or “unfaithful”) always allowed for the possibility that, besides all the unfaithful who are validly baptized or otherwise in covenant with God, some unbaptized (who are “unjust”/”unfaithful” too) will also be raised to condemnation. In Act 24:15, the word translated “unjust” is the Greek “adikos”; other uses of the same original word plainly include the unbaptized:

  • 1Co 6:1: “When one of you has a grievance against a brother, does he dare go to law before the unrighteous (adikos) instead of the saints?” — The “unrighteous” are directly contrasted with the “saints”.
  • 1Pe 3:18: “For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust (adikos), that he might bring us to God” — The “unjust” are those who are in the process of being brought to God, a perfect definition of the as-yet-unbaptized!
  • 2Pe 2:9: “The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust (adikos) unto the day of judgment to be punished” — The immediate context here equates the godly with Lot (v. 7), and the unjust with the men of Sodom and Gomorrah (v. 6), and plainly says that they — being “unjust” — will be punished on the day of judgment.

Again in the immediate context of Act 24:15, the Gentile ruler Felix, who heard these words of Paul about a “resurrection of the wicked”, grew fearful when — only a few days later — Paul spoke to him again of “the judgment to come” (Act 24:25). If a resurrection of the “wicked” or the “unjust” (Act 24:15) plainly held no threat at all for any unbaptized Gentile, why did Felix tremble when told of the judgment?

The analysis of “essential doctrines” demonstrates that Deu 19 and its context formed part of the teaching presented as a preliminary to baptism: “The LORD thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken… I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him.”

It is true that these words were spoken by Moses to the children of Israel, and not to Gentiles, and that — likewise — they are quoted by Peter when addressing the children of Israel again (Act 3:22,23). But… the warning includes the serious, all-inclusive “whosoever”! It is the same inclusiveness used by Peter in Act 2:39: “For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.”

The promise of blessing, even when spoken to Jews, is also to “all that are afar off” (ie, Gentiles: Eph 2:13,17; 3:5-8; Isa 57:19). Surely — if those same “all” knowingly and willfully refuse the offer of such a promise — they cannot expect to avoid the effect of such refusal: “Whosoever will not hearken to my words… I will require it of him.”

The history of the “resurrectional responsibility” division indicates that the original Clause XXIV was at the time of its drafting understood to allow for the unbaptized responsible, who had refused to give heed to the words of Christ. But a prominent English brother (JJ Andrew of London) began to teach, in the 1890s, that those responsible to a resurrectional judgment could not possibly include any who were either uncircumcised (in the Mosaic dispensation) or unbaptized (in the Christian dispensation), because such were not cleansed from “Adamic condemnation” by the “blood of the covenant”, and thus could not be delivered, even briefly and by Divine decree, from the curse of an “eternal death”. The controversy from this new (or, if not so “new”, then “newly prominent”) teaching led the Birmingham Christadelphian Ecclesia to change its Statement of Faith in an attempt to rule out the teaching that Christ could not raise and judge any who were unbaptized.

However, the brief analysis above suggests that a careful reading of the original clause (even before the Amendment) — with its reference to the “unfaithful” — should have ruled out such teaching in the first place. Then there would have been no need for an amendment of doubtful meaning and application.

The amendment defines the responsible as “namely, those who know the revealed will of God, and have been called upon to submit to it”. (It does not say, as some suggest, that the “responsible” are all who know the Gospel; it might even be argued that it pointedly avoids saying such a thing.)

The amendment was, and is, doubtful as to its meaning, since who can truly know (a) if another has not only known enough of the will of God, but especially (b) if that same person has been called upon (by God? by man? and in what manner?) to submit to it. And thus, of course, it was, and is, doubtful as to its application in individual cases: Few if any Christadelphians ever try to apply the Scriptural warnings about resurrectional judgment to specific individuals — and that is as it should be.

More might be said about the ambiguities of the amendment. For example, what does “those who know” really mean? Some might say, ‘What a foolish question! The answer is obvious!’ But is it? There are two primary Greek words translated “to know”:

(a) oida = to know from observation, to know theoretically and, perhaps, rather imperfectly;

(b) ginosko = to know experimentally, by direct personal contact, and generally to know fully and intimately.

Understandably, there is not always a perfectly clear demarcation between these two Greek words — gray areas do exist. However, depending on which of the above definitions is given the word “know” in the Amendment, the statement can be made to mean very different things. In other words, in order to be responsible to resurrectional judgment, how much need one know? And how well need one know it? Who can say for sure?

Secondly, there is of course uncertainty about the phrase “called upon to submit to it”. The very reasonable questions have been asked: ‘How does God call men?’ ‘How can we ever know which — if any — among the unbaptized today have been truly called by God?’ In fact, to be “called” — Scripturally — goes far beyond “knowledge”:

“Those he called, he also justified” (Rom 8:30). “…Live lives worthy of God, who calls you into his kingdom and glory” (1Th 2:12). “…As members of one body you were called to peace” (Col 3:15; also see Rom 8:28; 9:23,24; Eph 4:1; Jud 1).

Such examples could be multiplied many times over. In fact, out of more than 100 passages, the concept of “calling” is almost invariably associated with those who have been or go on to be baptized.

What does all this mean? Among other things, it means that the Amendment was and is so worded that one might accept it while still not believing that all “enlightened rejecters” (whatever that means, exactly) will be raised and judged by Christ at his coming.

And, to stretch the point a bit further, it means that the amendment is so worded that one might accept it while having reservations about the resurrection to judgment of any “enlightened rejecters” in this modern age, when the Holy Spirit is not openly manifest. How? Because, in the absence of Holy Spirit guidance, none of us can determine how much an unbaptized person must “know” or, indeed, whether that “knowledge” must be theoretical or practical, impersonal or personal, objective or subjective. And, finally, because none of us can really determine how and when, or even if, any unbaptized person has been Scripturally “called” by God.

The following point needs to be made, and stressed: The original Birmingham Statement of Faith (used by many ecclesias even today, and generally referred to as the “Unamended Statement”) is not in opposition to the “Amended Statement”. How can this be said? Because the original Clause XXIV, along with Clause XXV, plainly teaches that the resurrectionally “responsible” includes the “unfaithful”, and because — as the passages above, such as 1Co 6:1 and 1Pe 3:18, indicate — there is no Biblical warrant for limiting the “unfaithful” to the baptized class only.

Are the unbaptized raised upon a different “basis” than the baptized? Such a question implies that, for fellowship purposes, we must know the means (the “why” and the “how”) as well as the end (the “who”). To ask such question is to move the discussion from a “first principles” matter to a non-essential matter. And so, to pursue such a question as though it were a “first principle” is to create an artificial barrier where none need exist. The course of wisdom? Agree on the essential doctrine, and then discuss further details only with other “experts” who need — or think they need — to know!

So, should there have been a division in the first place? While making allowances for our lack of firsthand knowledge of those times, one may be tempted to think that, had the Christadelphian body given due prominence and weight to the (unarguably) fundamental Bible teaching of the One Body, they might have found a way to prevent a serious and destructive division.

The more responsible (!) question now is: What can be done about such a division? And the simple answer is: The minority (i.e., the “Unamended” in North America) — if not truly believers in what may be called the JJ Andrew error — should ask themselves, in the spirit of the fundamental Bible teaching on the One Body: ‘Why have we resisted for so long a statement which essentially occurs in our own (“Unamended”) Statement of Faith anyway?’

And, going one step further, the majority (ie, the “Amended”) might ask themselves: ‘Why have we made our own special interpretation of a vague amendment [Remember, it does not say, “All who know will be raised”!] the test of fellowship for everyone else — thus raising a relatively minor matter to such an extraordinary level?’ And… ‘Have we used our Statement of Faith as a weapon to punish (or a wall to exclude) those who differ from us only slightly and on a secondary matter?’

Resurrectional responsibility proofs

Joh 12:48-50; Deu 18:19; 29:19,20; Rom 2:8,9; Act 24:25; 17:30,32; 1Pe 4:4,5; Luk 13:28; 19:27; 14:25,31-33; 12:48; 10:14; 2Pe 2:6-9; Joh 9:41; 8:21; 3:18,19; 15:22; Rev 21:8; Isa 66:24; Jud 1:14,15; 2Th 1:8,9; Mat 11:20-24; Heb 2:3; 10:28,29.

Rev 17 woman

The woman of Rev 17:

To begin with, there is a plain connection with the woman of Rev 12, who can rather easily be identified with Israel:

  • The sun, moon, and stars (12:1) are frequent Bible symbols of Israel (Gen 37:9,10; 22:17; Jer 31:35,36; Amos 8:9; Mic 3:6; Isa 60:20; Joel 2:10,30,31; 3:15; Psa 89:35-36).

  • The son whom she bears, who rules the nations, is Jesus (Rev 19:15; cp Psa 2:9; 110:2)… not Constantine!

  • The dragon’s attempts to kill the baby Jesus (Mat 2:1-6) are shown in Rev 12:4.

  • After the birth of the special child, the “woman” (Israel) flees into the wilderness (Rev 12:6,14) = the dispersion of Israel.

Later, the same woman (or so it would seem) appears already “in the wilderness” (Rev 17:1-3), where she had fled earlier, but now she is a harlot, drastically changed!

And she is riding on a beast! At first glance, the beast seems to be “Babylon”, doesn’t it? Because the whole system described in Daniel, of which Babylon was the head, is easily equated with the 7 heads (the number of the heads of the 4 beasts in Dan 7), and ten horns (equates with 10 toes of image in Dan 2).

But it is the woman who has the name of “Babylon” written on her forehead (Rev 17:5). So will the real Babylon please stand up? Is it the beast, or the woman, or both?

I would suggest, it is both, in this sense: The beast is truly the Latter Day Babylon (read Iraq, or some similar Middle East coalition of Arab nations bent on the promotion of Islam, the conquest of Jerusalem, and the destruction of Judaism).

And the woman is “Babylon”, but in a different sense. She has the name of Babylon tattooed on her forehead! She is now the SLAVE of Babylon, being marked by him on her forehead (cp Rev 13:16). (By contrast, and by way of explanation, the servants, or slaves, of God are marked on their foreheads with the name of the Father and the Son: Rev 7:3; 2:17; 14:1; Eze 9:4).

But, from Rev 12, we have seen that the “woman” has a strong connection with Israel. And she is still Israel, but only the subset of Israel which has gone over to the enemy. She has given up being the handmaid of God, and has become the slave of Babylon. And now she is, along with Babylon proper, a fierce persecutor of the saints, apostles, and prophets of God (the revived witnesses among Israel in the Last Days — who are described in Rev 11 as perishing in Jerusalem).

How could this have happened? How could Israel be a party to the persecution of its own citizens? Perhaps like this: As a result of its defeat by Babylon and the 10 (Arab) kings in the Last Days, the nation of Israel has now become differentiated into two totally disparate elements: the faithful remnant who bear the mark of God and His Son, and the unfaithful harlot who bear the mark of Babylon — who see their main chance, their only chance in selling their birthright and allying themselves with the loathsome enemy so as to receive a share of the Beast’s power. These powers the harlot uses, to the best of her ability, to persecute her own countrymen, the faithful remnant, the true Jewish believers who have developed in her midst.

This scenario looks remarkably like two other familiar situations: (a) Israel in the first century, where the Jewish leadership (Herod and the high priest class) collaborated with the Roman overlords (Pilate, etc) to persecute the faithful Jewish believers in their midst; and (b) on a more secular level, the German-puppet Vichy government of occupied France during World War II.

So what happens to the Israel “woman” riding on the Babylonian “beast”? Things go well for her… but only for a while… then she loses her seat of power, is cast down to the ground, and devoured by the Babylonian beast: “The beast and the ten horns you saw will hate the prostitute. They will bring her to ruin and leave her naked; they will eat her flesh and burn her with fire” (Rev 17:16). Because she is, after all, only so many more detestable Jews… and Jewish collaborators are perhaps even more to be detested than other Jews by the Muslim Arabs after they have fulfilled some kind of initial usefulness.

It may be added that there is another interesting Scriptural connection along these lines, and it has to do with the harlot “Jezebel” introduced earlier in the Revelation (Rev 2:20-24). The original (OT) Jezebel was a Gentile (an Arab!) and an idolater and a false prophetess who married into Israel (king Ahab), and who used her high position to promote immorality and to persecute God’s true followers (like Elijah) among her “countrymen”! What better name, then, for an Arab-Israeli composite “harlot” persecutor of the righteous Jewish remnant in the Last Days? (Notice how clearly Elijah is delineated in Rev 11, for example.) (And notice, also, how the Last Days “Jezebel” is eaten by wild beasts just like her OT namesake was eaten by dogs!)

Rev in the first century, interpreting

Suppose you were a believer in Ephesus in the first century, and your congregation has just received and read the book of Revelation. Would you not eagerly set about trying to understand the contents of the book? The document would be there to study at length. What background information and reference material might you bring to the study? Here are some suggestions:

a. You belong to an established church, or ecclesia, founded by the apostle Paul. It was born in controversy and grew in the midst of adversity (Acts 19). So you have several experienced members to confer with.
b. You have read the letter from Paul to the Ephesians, and therefore have been given insights into:

  • the heavenly places with Christ,

  • being saved by grace through faith,

  • deliverance from the prince of the power of the air,

  • the glorious opportunity for Gentiles,

  • the need for unity,

  • the conflict with darkness,

  • the need to make the most of the time (for the days are evil),

  • the need to pray for persecuted saints,

  • the need to witness boldly (knowing that victory in Christ is certain).
  • c.
  • You have heard the report of the elders who last met with Paul (Acts 20:17-35), and you know about the price of witnessing, the warnings of apostasy, and the exhortation to hold fast.
  • d.
  • You have had Timothy as an elder for some time; you will have undoubtedly seen the results of Paul’s pastoral letters to him, eg:

  • Stand up for your beliefs,

  • Resist heretics,

  • Serve the living Christ who is the Savior of the church, or ecclesia,

  • Be warned of times of stress to appear in the ecclesial world in the last days, and

  • Preach Christ.
  • e.
  • You would be aware of the spread of the Gospel in Asia, but also of the work of the Judaizers (eg, Gal 2:4,5), who were out to undermine Paul.
  • f.
  • You probably have a copy of some of the New Testament writings, especially the Mount Olivet prophecy by Jesus, and almost certainly a copy of the Septuagint (the Old Testament in Greek).
  • g.
  • You would be aware of the Jewish uprising against Rome (keenly so if the Revelation were written just before AD 70). Given the background information and reference material, you would be able to identify with much of the Revelation content, especially the basic conflict between Christ’s disciples and the many “enemies” of the Truth.

Now come to interpreting the Revelation itself. Would you not assume that the whole message was relevant, since Jesus had just sent it to you? In the first place, the message was explicitly sent to your church. Ephesus had held out against false teachers, but had also lost its first love. Is this true? Of course — Jesus said so. And if true of you personally, then you need to repent.

Next, there are messages sent to other churches. Can you learn from them? Of course. We can always learn from the mistakes of others, and be warned against making the same mistakes ourselves.

What about the visions (from Rev 4 onwards)? Many points are directly relevant to you and your church (see above): (a) Resist false prophets. (b) Hope for the tree of life. (c) Overcome through the blood of the Lamb. (d) Be ready for the Second Coming.

As to points pertaining to Israel: Assuming a date of writing prior to AD 70, you might guess that Israel was in for a very difficult time with Rome, and that a great tribulation would come upon that land as a result of the rebellion. However, according to your awareness of Old Testament prophecy (and the Olivet prophecy?), the ultimate outcome must be the oppressor’s destruction and the faithful remnant’s restoration in the Kingdom of God.

In the meantime, you must faithfully endure (like the martyred Antipas and the exiled John), for Jesus is coming soon.

Rev, 7 letters of

“Hear what the Spirit says to the churches.”

The message to the seven churches, or ecclesias:

  1. is direct from Jesus Christ, the Son of God.
  2. is urgent, as it deals with things soon to take place.

  3. points to specific church activities and attitudes which need to be changed before Christ’s second coming, which is repeatedly said to be “soon”.

  4. is clearly relevant and immediately applicable to believers in modern times, around the world.

  5. has power to save: to save us from ourselves, and to save us from the big troubles that are coming on this world.

Many disciples are reluctant to read, much less study, the book of Revelation (sometimes called the Apocalypse, from the Greek word meaning “that which is unveiled, or revealed”). Some potential readers are simply daunted — they feel completely inadequate to understand all those symbols and prophetic sayings. Some have the impression they need an encyclopedic knowledge of history in order to properly interpret the text — and they have no inclination to become historians. Some have heard several different expositions of the book and find themselves totally discouraged — if different interpretations are going to cause turmoil, the best thing is to avoid getting into the fray. Finally, some rightly perceive that effort is required to come to a reasonable understanding of the book — and they basically don’t like studying.

Yet see the blessings missed by such reluctant students:

“Blessed is he who reads the words of the prophecy, and blessed are those who hear, and who keep what is written therein; for the time is near” (Rev 1:3).

Because the book itself promises a blessing to the reader, and a double blessing to those hearers who keep (do) what is written (taught) in the Revelation, we encourage everyone to read and study the Bible text for him/herself. You will find the effort immediately rewarding. You will discover that the text often explains itself. You will perceive that the general struggle between the “good guys” (eg, the Lamb and his followers) and the “bad guys” (eg, the Beast and its followers) is similar to what the rest of the Bible talks about. Finally, you will be pleased to learn that at least the first three and last two chapters of the book (that’s almost 25%) are relatively easy to understand, and certainly quite relevant to your life of discipleship. So make the effort.

Take an initial or another first-hand look at the words, and absorb the teaching of the message.

Your reading of Revelation 2 and 3 is to begin the three-step process stated in the verse cited earlier:

“Blessed is…

  • he who reads the words of the prophecy, and
  • blessed are those who hear, and
  • who keep what is written therein; for the time is near.”

Reading is the easy part. Hearing is more difficult; it implies that you are paying close attention to what the words actually say, with the intention to do something about them once they are understood. Keeping is the most difficult, since it means living out the teaching of Scripture in our daily lives. The daily doing of God’s commandments is the test of whether we truly love God (cf 1Jo 5:2,3), but it is made possible only by the help of God Himself.

The basic message of the Revelation is crystal clear: Jesus, the Lamb of God, has defeated Sin in his first coming, and will score the final victory over Sin (and the world of wickedness) in his second coming.

If you are one of the faithful, hang in there!

If you are one of the wayward, REPENT, and then hang in there!

If you are one of the opposition, you are not only going to lose, you are going to be destroyed — maybe you should think about switching sides?

So make sure you keep/get on Christ’s side before it’s too late!

Interpretation is generally straightforward. Take the first few verses in Rev 1. The opening verse tells us that it is “the revelation of Jesus Christ…”. Although the verse goes on to say that God gave it to Jesus, the emphasis seems to be on the glorified Christ, and how he has been commissioned by God “to show to his servants what must soon take place”. Thus Jesus “made it known by sending his angel to his servant John…”

When this angel speaks, it is like Jesus himself speaking. So the voice in Rev 1:10,12, and Rev 1:17 onwards, comes from a representative angel who is depicted as a glorified high priest (Rev 1:13-16) and asserts that he is the resurrected Lord (Rev 1:17,18). With this authority, the Jesus-angel claims to hold the seven churches in his right hand (Rev 1:20), to walk in their midst (Rev 1:13; 2:1), and to bring a specific message for each of the seven churches (Rev 1:11). So when the phrase “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches” is repeated seven times (Rev 2:7,11,17,29; 3:6,13,22), this is a matter that demands our attention!

Study, analyze, outline, and draw your own conclusions. The point is that anyone and everyone can do this kind of study and will profit from the work. If you are still doubting whether or not to make the effort, consider this: a disciple cannot “keep” the words of the book unless he/she first understands them. God’s blessing only comes to those who “keep the words of the prophecy of this book” (Rev 22:7).

You can bet your life on the trustworthiness of these words. They are certain. They come directly from the Lord. And they are urgent. Read them for yourself:

“These words are trustworthy and true. And the Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, has sent his angel to show his servants what must soon take place. And behold, I am coming soon” (Rev 22:6,7).

General characteristics of the seven letters

  1. Each letter begins with “To the angel of the church in ______ write: The words of him…”

  2. Each introduces Christ by some description from Rev 1 appropriate to the particular church, and ends with a promise which agrees with this description.

  3. Each has “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches”.

  4. Each opens with “I know your works” or its equivalent.

  5. Five churches are told to repent. The other two are promised a crown.

  6. A coming of the Lord is referred to in five of the letters; “Satan” is mentioned in four.

  7. Each church is unique, and despite serious sin in their midst, all still belong to Christ.

Two interesting points that tie the letters together with the rest of the Book:

First, “These are the words of him who…” always introduces an aspect of the great One Like the Son of Man in Rev 1, or Christ:

  • Rev 2:1: Seven stars, seven lampstands: see Rev 1:13,16.

  • Rev 2:8: first and last: see Rev 1:8.

  • Rev 2:12: sharp, 2-edged sword: see Rev 1:16.

  • Rev 2:18: eyes of fire, feet of bronze: see Rev 1:14,15.

  • Rev 3:1: Seven stars: Rev 1:16,20.

  • Rev 3:7: The key of David, to open…: Rev 1:18.

  • Rev 3:14: Amen, the faithful and true witness: Rev 1:5.

Secondly, “To him who overcomes, I will give/do…” always introduces a promise which has been developed in more detail in the body of the Book of Revelation, later…

  • Rev 2:7: tree of life, in paradise of God: Rev 22:1,2.

  • Rev 2:11: not hurt of second death: Rev 20:6,14; 21:8.

  • Rev 2:17: hidden manna, white stone, new name: Rev 3:12.

  • Rev 2:29: morning star: Rev 22:16.

  • Rev 3:5: book of life: Rev 13:8; 17:8; etc.

  • Rev 3:12: New Jerusalem: Rev 21:2.

  • Rev 3:21: to sit on my throne…: Rev 5:6-8; 7:17.

Thus the message to the seven churches unifies the whole of Revelation… because in these messages the identity of the speaker AND the promises of God are tied together.

Rev, a framework for understanding the

This article is designed to help a Bible student better understand the book of Revelation. The articles will illustrate a method for making sense of the text and present a framework for interpretation.

Preview

An “Introduction” will discuss the following:

  1. The author and audience
  2. The date of writing
  3. First-century application

  4. Resolving a critical problem
  5. The stage set again

The next section, “What Happens in the Book”, will begin looking at the specific details in the book. In particular, each chapter will be described in terms of its setting, the beings involved, and the action that takes place.

Introduction

The author and audience

The book opens with a clear statement of who is revealing what to whom:

“The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants what must soon take place; and he made it known by sending his angel to his servant John” (Rev 1:1).

The revelation (Gr “apokalypsis”) is about Jesus, and by Jesus. God is the original source of the information (cf 2Ti 3:15). John is the recipient of the words and visions via the angel sent by Jesus. It will become plain that the Apocalypse is characterized by prophetic language and focuses on the imminent Coming of Christ.

“Blessed is he who reads aloud the words of the prophecy, and blessed are those who hear, and who keep what is written therein; for the time is near. John to the seven churches that are in Asia…” (Rev 1:3,4).

The initial readers of the Revelation were members of the seven churches in Asia (today’s western Turkey). In the first century setting, one person apparently read for many hearers. This resulted in a seven-part communication chain. By God’s providence, that same apocalyptic message has been preserved for us to read and understand and obey.

God –> Jesus –> Jesus’ angel –> apostle John –> 7 churches –> reader –> hearers (us!)

In the beginning and end of the book (Rev 1:4; 22:16), the seven churches are stated to be the intended audience. They are specifically addressed in detail in Rev 2; 3. They also seem to be brought into the story at key points in the message (eg, Rev 13:9,10; 14:12; 16:15). Therefore, the entirety of the book must have been relevant to them. Moreover, they would have been expected to understand what was written. To have received a prophetic message that was incomprehensible would be pointless.

Date of writing

There are no dates given in the book. This means the actual date of writing is unknown. But there are some reasonable arguments available to determine the approximate time.

First of all, it was written during the lifetime of the apostle John, which puts the date of writing sometime in the first century — unless John was extraordinarily old.

Secondly, we know John was “on the island called Patmos on account of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus” (Rev 1:9). Evidently, John had been exiled to Patmos because of his Christian faith. Furthermore, John states that he was sharing “the tribulation” with brethren (also v 9). Therefore, it is reasonable to think that John wrote during a time of widespread persecution of the Christians. The most likely times are the periods of intense persecution like those described in Revelation 2:9,10,13; 3:9,10, which interestingly enough seem to couple persecution by both Jew and Gentile.

The apostle Paul wrote about such persecutions (eg, 2Ti 2:11,12; 2Co 11:24-26) and indeed was imprisoned by Romans as a result of Jewish hostility and false accusation. Peter likewise wrote about the “fiery ordeal” to be experienced by “the brotherhood throughout the world” (1Pe 4:12-19; 5:8-10). The Christians in Jerusalem were reminded about their public abuse and affliction, the plundering of property and imprisonment, and exhorted to endure again (Heb 10:32-26; 13:3). If all of these are pointing to the same general time period, John may have been imprisoned for reasons comparable to Paul: in the defense and confirmation of the gospel (cf Phi 1:7,12-18). That argues a time when both Jew and Roman were persecutors of the Christians.

Going outside Scripture, the history books inform us about many times of persecution in the first century. Bible students tend to zero in on one of two periods: during the reigns of Roman Caesars Nero (AD 54-68) or Domitian (AD 81-96). Since the Jewish persecution effectively dried up after the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70, the only time period which reflected both Jewish and Roman persecution was during Nero’s reign. Given the selection criteria of a concurrent, intense Roman and Jewish persecution, the date of writing the Apocalypse had to be proximate to AD 70, and most likely before.

A full discussion about the evidence for an early date of writing can be found in the article entitled “When was the Revelation written?” (see Lesson, Rev, date of). However, the debate about dates should not intrude upon the fact that John did write the book, and that he wrote it for our instruction.

Each person should decide what date makes the most sense from the internal, Bible evidence (this is given the most weight) as well as the external, non-Biblical evidence. While having one date or another in mind will undoubtedly affect the interpretation framework, it should not affect the lessons taught and the exhortation provided. And it definitely will not affect the certainty of Christ’s return!

First-century application

Members of the seven first-century ecclesias would have sought to understand and apply the apocalyptic message to their situations and lives, just as they would have done for any Scripture. In short, there was an actual, meaningful first-century application of the entire Revelation prophecy, which did not (because it could not) include the historical events of the next 1900 years.

Two suggestions emerge from this observation. First, any interpretation of Revelation should take into account what the initial hearers thought had happened or was about to happen in their lifetimes. Second, while every generation of believers would be right in applying the words of Revelation to their point in history — just as we do today — a legitimate understanding of the book cannot depend upon a knowledge of interim history. There was and is sufficient information in Scripture itself to provide a suitable interpretative framework for understanding and applying the Apocalypse.

Without doubt, a principal teaching of Revelation is the literal return of Jesus Christ to earth to establish the Kingdom of God and reward the faithful by sharing his throne and glory (eg, Rev 1:6; 5:10; 11:15; 20:4; 22:4,5; 2:26,27; 3:21). That glorious event has yet to happen. When the first-century readers pondered the Revelation, they surely believed that Jesus was to come in their lifetimes. But he did not. Does that mean the early believers had a wrong understanding of the book? No! How else would one interpret the following texts?:

  • “… what must soon take place (Rev 1:1)…
  • for the time is near (Rev 1:3)…
  • I am coming soon (Rev 3:11)…
  • what must soon take place (Rev 22:6)…
  • Behold, I am coming soon (Rev 22:7)…
  • Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense with me (Rev 22:12)…

  • Surely I am coming soon” (Rev 22:20).

Resolving a critical problem

So how does a Bible student reconcile the idea that the first-century believers were right to believe that Jesus was coming soon — in their lifetimes — with the fact that Jesus did not come? Several solutions have been offered to this very real dilemma. The following suggestion, which happens to go hand-in-hand with the viewpoint that the Apocalypse was written prior to AD 70, seems to be a reasonable solution.

In two parables, Jesus predicted the overthrow of the Jewish nation because of the Jews’ wickedness, ie, their refusal to accept him as God’s Messiah (Mat 21:43; 22:7). In his Mount Olivet prophecy, Jesus was specific about the desolation of the land and the destruction of Jerusalem (cf Luke 21:20-24). Like God did in the past, this method of prophetic teaching was designed as a last resort to bring the hearers to repentance (eg, 2Ch 36:15-17).

Jesus also declared, “You will not see me again, until you say, ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord’ ” (Mat 23:39). Notice carefully the placement of the “until”: First they say, then they see — not the other way around! This necessary repentance of the Jews as a prerequisite to Christ’s return was also taught by the apostles (eg, Acts 3:19,20). Evidently, the Jews who experienced the Roman devastation of their land and cities, and underwent the horrible siege of Jerusalem, did not call out in faith to God to send the Savior. Likewise, the Jews surviving the Roman overthrow in AD 70 did not manifest the repentance required by God. Therefore, God did not send Jesus.

So the stage was set for Christ’s return. Jesus could have come, as indicated in the Olivet prophecy (Mat 24:29-31; Mar 13:28,29), several of the New Testament letters (1Th 5:1-11; 2Th 2:1-8; 1Pe 4:3-5,17-19; 2Pe 3:1-13), and the Revelation (Rev 1:7; 3:11; 22:7). But unrepentant Israel postponed the fulfillment of that teaching.

Yet God’s purpose has not been frustrated in the least (cf Isa 55:11). There was obviously an alternative way of fulfilling the prophecy. In this case, “the times of the Gentiles” (Luke 21:24) appear to have lasted a long time. But there also appears to be a limit set: “until the full number of the Gentiles come in” (Rom 11:25), ie, until they believe in Jesus Christ and thus come into God’s household of faith. The context of this last reference in enlightening:

“Lest you be wise in your own conceits, I want you to understand this mystery, brethren: a hardening has come upon part of Israel, until the full number of the Gentiles come in, and so all Israel will be saved; as it is written, ‘The Deliverer will come from Zion, he will banish ungodliness from Jacob’, and this will be my covenant with them when I take away their sins” (Rom 11:25-27).

This passage indicates that there is a plan by God to save both Jew and Gentile. When the full number has been reached — like in the days of Noah when the ark was finally filled with those people who were wanting to be saved — the Deliverer will come! The wailing and mourning of the Jews who recognize Jesus as their Messiah suggests that they have finally perceived the mercy of God and come to repentance (Rev 1:7; Mat 24:30; Zec 12:10).

The stage set again

The stage has been set one more time for the imminent return of Jesus. The nation of Israel was miraculously brought into existence again by God in 1948. Many of the details of the Mount Olivet prophecy seem to fit the situation in Israel today. The first-century scenario, of Israel versus Gentile powers, is being played out again with modern counterparts. Scripture seems to have anticipated a third and final showdown (Eze 21:27): there was Babylon and its allies in 586 BC, Rome and its mercenaries in AD 70, and finally a last-days “beast” and “horns” in ????. We may well be that generation of people who experience the Coming of Christ!

The battle’s outcome is certain. Jesus will win. So the nearness of Christ’s Coming and the importance to be ready for it was, is, and will be absolutely relevant to every generation of believers. True disciples will always be living as if it were “the last days”. And if Christ does not actually return in their lifetimes and they die, in his service, they simply fall asleep, waiting the time of resurrection. And their next waking moment will be standing before their king, ready to be rewarded with the rest of “those who fear God’s name, both small and great” (Rev 11:18).

What happens in the Book

Before developing a framework for understanding, it makes sense to become familiar with the contents of the book. A simple way is usually a good way. One helpful way is to take the chapters in order, and briefly describe the setting, the beings, and the activity of each chapter. This information will begin to dictate the framework requirements.

Chapter 1

Setting: The island called Patmos, off the coast of Asia Minor, 40 miles southwest of the city of Ephesus. John the apostle is in exile “on account of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus”, ie, on account of his Christian faith.

Beings: God, Jesus Christ, the angel sent by Jesus, the glorified Jesus, and John.

Activity: God gives the revelation to Jesus, who then gives it to his angel to present to John, who is instructed to “write what you see in a book and send it to the seven churches…” After the appropriate prologue (vv 1-8), John describes how he was “in the Spirit on the Lord’s day” and finds himself in what appears to be the Holy Place of a temple, with seven golden lampstands in it. He then experiences the visitation of an extraordinarily glorious being (vv 9-18), which initially causes John to fall senseless to the ground.

From the given details, such as “I died, and behold, I am alive for evermore”, this glorious being evidently represents the resurrected and exalted Christ. The glorified Jesus explains that the seven stars in his right hand are the “angels of the seven churches” and that the seven lampstands “are the seven churches”. John is again instructed: “Now write what you see, what is, and what is to take place hereafter.”

Chapters 2 and 3

Setting: John in the Spirit on the Lord’s Day (same as Rev 1:10).

Beings: The glorified Jesus, the angels of the seven churches, the seven churches, and John.

Activity: John writes successive messages to each of the seven church congregations (via its angel), in the geographically clockwise order of Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamos, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodicea. In each message, the glorified Jesus introduces himself in terms of the characteristics listed in 1:13-18. Each congregation is commended, rebuked, and exhorted as appropriate; each is promised the rewards of being a spiritual conqueror; and each is told, “He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.”

Chapter 4

Setting: John, still in the Spirit, is transferred to God’s rainbowed throne room in heaven.

Beings: God, 24 enthroned elders, four living creatures, and John.

Activity: John is invited to enter an open door in heaven: “Come up hither, and I will show you what must take place after this.” In the heavenly throne room, John sees a Being on His throne (v 2), with four cherubim-like “living creatures” on each side of the throne, surrounded by twenty-four white-robed, golden-crowned “elders”. The four living creatures never cease to sing the praise of the Lord God Almighty (v 8), and the 24 elders give round-the-clock worship to the Creator God, Who is worthy of all honor (v 11).

Chapter 5

Setting: Same as Rev 4.

Beings: Same as Rev 4, plus a strong angel, the Lamb, and — by implication of their voices being heard — myriads of angels and every creature in heaven, on earth, under the earth, and in the sea.

Activity: John sees a scroll in the right hand of the Creator and weeps because a search throughout the universe fails to find anyone qualified to open it (even a strong angel?). His weeping is ended, however, when one of the elders assures him that “the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has conquered, so that he can open the scroll and its seven seals.”

When John takes a closer look, he sees a Lamb standing between the throne and the four living creatures and among the elders. This Lamb takes the scroll from the Creator’s right hand and becomes the object of a new song by the elders, who praise his sacrifice and his kingship to come: “Worthy art thou to take the scroll and to open its seals, for thou wast slain and by thy blood didst ransom men for God from every tribe and tongue and people and nation, and hast made them a kingdom and priests to our God, and they shall reign on earth” (v 10). The angelic host and all creation join in the praise, and the four living creatures pronounce a climactic “Amen!” to the worship.

Chapter 6

Setting: The same as Rev 5. But from his vantage point in heaven, John is able to see events unfold on the earth below. Attention is focused on those scenarios.

Beings: He who is seated on the throne (v 16), the Lamb, the four living creatures, four horses and their riders, those involved in each seal scenario, and John.

Activity: John sees the Lamb open the first six seals on the scroll, one by one. Each of the first four seals in accompanied by a call, “Come!”, from one of the four living creatures, whereupon a colored horse with a specially-equipped rider comes forth. The white horse and rider (with a bow) go out conquering. The red horse and rider (with a sword) take peace from the earth. The black horse and rider (with a measuring balance) bring famine. The pale horse and rider (named Death) kill with sword, famine, pestilence, and wild beasts.

Upon the opening of the fifth seal, John sees dead martyrs under the temple altar, hears their cry for vindication, sees them each given a white robe, and hears the promise that (after a further trial for living saints) their cry will soon be answered. The sixth seal opening brings monumental chaos: a great earthquake; portents in the sun, moon, stars, and sky; whole mountains and islands in upheaval; and terror among every class of people — who seek to hide from the day of wrath of God and the Lamb. The picture fades out on this scene of impending disaster for the existing world.

Chapter 7

Setting: The same heavenly temple as in Rev 6. This time, the earthly scene changes to four angels holding winds that will soon be allowed to blow in judgment on the earth.

Beings: God who is seated on the throne (v 10), the Lamb, the four living creatures, the 24 elders, four angels who hold the winds, another angel who gives them instructions, a great multitude of people (represented by 144,000), and John.

Activity: Four angels are standing at the four corners of the earth (land of Israel?), temporarily holding back the four winds from blowing. A fifth angel calls out to them to keep holding “till we have sealed the servants of our God upon their foreheads”. John hears the number of 144,000 spoken, 12,000 out of each of 12 named tribes of Israel. But when he looks, he sees a great multitude from every tribe, tongue, people, and nation, which could not be numbered. They stand before the throne and the Lamb, clothed in white robes and with palm branches in their hands, thanking God for salvation.

Then one of the elders asks John about the identity and background of the 144,000. John replies, “Sir, you know.” Whereupon the elder explains: they have spiritually survived “the great tribulation” and profited by the redemption made possible by the blood of Christ. Therefore, they are privileged to dwell in God’s temple, serving Him day and night, and thriving in His presence. They will never be hungry or thirsty or afflicted or tearful again, for “the Lamb… will be their shepherd.”

Chapters 8 and 9

Setting: The same heavenly temple as in Rev 7, but John looks down on another set of scenes on earth: six angelic trumpet blasts bring another series of God-sent disasters and destruction.

Beings: God, the Lamb, seven trumpet-carrying angels, another angel who carries a golden censer, those involved in each trumpet scenario, a flying eagle, and John.

Activity: The Lamb opens the seventh seal, and “there was silence in heaven for about half an hour.” Each of the seven angels who stood before God (Rev 8:2, the same as the seven spirits in Rev 1:4?) is given a trumpet. Another angel who is carrying a golden censer comes and stands at the heavenly altar. He is given “much incense to mingle with the prayers of the saints”. Then he fills the censer with fire from the altar and throws it on the earth, causing thunder, lightning, and an earthquake! This initiates the sounding of the seven trumpets.

The first trumpet blast brings hail and fire, mixed with blood to the earth. Result: a third of the land, trees and grass burn up. The second trumpet causes a great burning mountain to be thrown into the sea. Result: a third of the sea becomes blood, a third of the fish die, and a third of the ships are destroyed. The third trumpet causes a blazing star to fall on a third of the rivers and other water sources, poisoning the men who drink it. The fourth trumpet causes a third of the sun, moon and stars to be struck, so that both daylight and night light are darkened by a third.

An eagle then flies across the sky, crying “Woe, woe, woe” on earth’s inhabitants to accompany the three remaining trumpets.

The fifth trumpet blast (also called the first “woe”) reveals a star fallen from heaven to earth. It opens a bottomless pit from which a sun-darkening cloud of locusts emerges; they pour forth and begin to torment mankind for five months with their scorpion stings. The locusts resemble battle horses, with men’s faces and women’s hair. They are led by an angel king called “Destroyer”.

The sixth trumpet blast (the second “woe”) prompts a voice to call out from the temple altar, “Release the four angels who are bound at the great river Euphrates.” Upon their release, John hears the number of the size of their army: 200,000,000! Lion-headed, serpent-tailed horses which breathe fire, smoke and sulfur carry riders with sapphire breastplates. They kill a third of mankind. Notwithstanding this terrible God-directed plague, the rest of mankind do not repent.

Chapter 10

Setting: The earth, at a spot where the sea and land meet.

Beings: A rainbowed angel and John himself.

Activity: Another mighty angel comes down from heaven. He is wrapped in a cloud, and has a rainbow over his head, a face like the sun, and legs of fire. He has a little scroll in his hand. And he sets his right foot on the sea, and his left foot on the land, and calls out with a loud voice which causes seven thunders to sound. However, John is not permitted to record what the thunders say. The angel swears by the Creator that “there shall be no more delay”, and that the seventh trumpet will complete the fulfillment of the message of the prophets. He then instructs John himself to take and eat the little scroll, which proves sweet to John’s taste but bitter in his stomach. Then he is told, “You must prophecy about many people and nations and tongues and kings.”

Chapter 11

Setting: Primarily the earth: a temple, its outer court, and a great city. However, the chapter ends with a scene in the heavenly temple.

Beings: Two witnesses, the beast, others involved in the sixth and seventh trumpet scenario, God, the 24 elders, John himself, and Jesus.

Activity: John himself is given a measuring rod and asked to measure the earthly temple, but to leave out its outer court, which is to be given over to the Gentiles for 42 months. Two witnesses, symbolized by two combination olive trees/lampstands, enter the picture. They are further described as two prophets with powers much like those of Moses (eg, turning water to blood) and Elijah (eg, bringing fire down from heaven).

When they have finished their testimony for the Lord, “the beast that ascends from the bottomless pit” (the same place as Rev 9:2?) makes war on them and kills them. Their dead bodies are displayed for 3 1/2 days in the street of a great city (spiritually called Sodom and Egypt, where Jesus was crucified), to the great rejoicing of many peoples of many nations. Their celebration is abruptly ended when the breath of life from God enters the dead witnesses and the revitalized prophets ascend in a cloud up to heaven in the sight of their foes. The scene is climaxed by a great earthquake which destroys a tenth of the city, killing 7,000 people; the rest of the people “are terrified, and give glory to the God of heaven”.

The seventh angel now sounds the seventh trumpet, and the third “woe” begins.

Loud voices in heaven proclaim, “The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he shall reign for ever and ever.” The 24 elders join in the worship, declaring that the time has now come for God to take power and reign through Christ, who comes to judge the dead, reward the faithful, and destroy the destroyers of the earth. This scene ends with the heavenly temple being opened, showing the ark of the covenant. “And there were flashes of lightning, voices, peals of thunder, an earthquake, and heavy hail.”

Chapters 12 and 13

Setting: Heaven, though in a place different from the throne room. John continues to see events on earth as well, and there again appears to be interaction between heaven and earth.

Beings: Seven “dramatic personae”: a woman, a dragon, a male child, Michael the archangel, the rest of the woman’s offspring, a beast, and a second beast; God, John himself, and Jesus.

Activity: A great portent appears in heaven: a pregnant woman in travail, clothed with the sun, with a crown of twelve stars, and the moon under her feet. Then another portent appears: a great red dragon with seven crowned heads, ten horns, and a tail which sweeps down to earth a third of the stars of heaven. It is seeking to devour the child about to be born of the woman. A male child is born, but it is immediately caught up to God. The woman flees into the wilderness to a place prepared by god, and is nourished there for 1,260 days.

Now war in heaven breaks out. Michael and his angels fight against the dragon and his angels. The dragon, “that ancient serpent, who is called the Devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world — he is thrown down to the earth, and his angels are thrown down with him.” His defeat prompts the rejoicing of a loud voice in heaven, declaring that his expulsion means the salvation of God, and that the triumph is made possible by the blood of the Lamb. However, the wrath of the dragon, who knows there is only a short time left, is about to fall upon the earth.

Thus the scene changes to earth, with an enraged dragon pursuing the woman. The serpent pours out a flood of waters to sweep the woman away. She is given eagle wings to fly into the wilderness, and the earth — to help her — swallows up the flood waters. Now even more angry with the woman, the dragon goes off to make war on the rest of her offspring, “on those who keep the commandments of God and bear testimony to Jesus.”

John then perceives himself standing on the sand of the sea (the same place as 10:9?). There he sees a seven-headed, ten-horned beast rising out of the sea. Its horns have crowns, its heads have a blasphemous name upon them, and its body is a composite of lion, bear and leopard. The dragon gives its power to the beast, and this — along with a mortal head wound miraculously healed — causes men to worship both the dragon and the beast. Uttering haughty and blasphemous words, the beast is given authority for 42 months, and allowed to make war on the saints and conquer them. All except those whose names are written in the book of life fall prey to the authority and worship of the beast. Here is a “call for the endurance and faith of the saints”.

John then sees another beast which rises out of the earth. “It has two horns like a lamb and speaks like a dragon.” It exercises all the authority of the first beast in its presence, and makes the inhabitants of the earth worship the beast. Imitating Elijah-like signs from heaven, this second beast deceives men and convinces them to make an image of the first beast, which — being able to speak by the cunning of the second beast — then becomes the focus of worship. Anyone who does not worship the beast is killed. Finally, an identification system is set up so that no one can buy or sell unless they have the 666 mark of the beast.

Chapter 14

Setting: First, Mount Zion, on earth. Next, mid-heaven, with flying angels. Finally, the earth again, this time being reaped by two angels with sickles.

Beings: The Lamb, the 144,000, God, the four living creatures, the 24 elders, an angel flying in mid-heaven to proclaim an eternal gospel, a second angel declaring the fall of Babylon, a third angel warning those who worship the beast, a crowned sickle-bearer on a cloud, another angel who gives instructions to reap, another sickle-bearing angel, an angel who has power over fire, and John.

Activity: John sees the Lamb standing on Mount Zion with the 144,000. These redeemed ones learn a new song which only they can learn, and which they sing before the throne and before the four living creatures and the 24 elders.

Then John sees a flying angel who warns earth-dwellers with this message: “Fear God and give him glory, for the hour of his judgment has come; and worship him who made heaven and earth, the sea and the fountains of water.” Another angel follows, saying that Babylon the great has fallen. A third angels follows, saying that if anyone worships the beast and its image, or receives its mark, he shall suffer the wrath and destruction of God. (Here again is a call for the faithful endurance of the saints.)

Now the scene changes to a white cloud. Upon it sits “one like a son of man”, with a golden crown on his head and a sharp sickle in his hand. He is instructed by another angel to “put in your sickle, and reap.” So he does, and the earth’s harvest is reaped.

Then the vision changes to the heavenly temple. Another angel with a sharp sickle comes out and is instructed by yet another angel — one who comes from the altar and has power of fire — to “put in your sickle, and gather the clusters of the vine of the earth…” So the ripe grapes are cut and thrown into the great winepress of God’s wrath.

Chapter 15

Setting: Heaven. Then the temple of the tent of witness in heaven.

Beings: Seven angels with seven plagues, those who have conquered the beast, the four living creatures, and John.

Activity: John sees another portent in heaven: seven angels with seven plagues. They represent the last of God’s wrath to come on the earth. Then John sees a sea of glass, and standing beside it those who have conquered the beast and its image and the number of its name. They have harps in their hands, and sing the song of Moses and the song of the Lamb.

After this, John looks and sees the temple of the tent of witness opened. Out of it come the seven angels with the seven plagues. They are robed in pure bright linen and girded with golden girdles. One of the four living creatures gives each of them a golden bowl filled with God’s wrath. Then the temple is filled with the smoke of God’s glory, and no one is allowed access until the seven plagues are ended.

Chapter 16

Setting: The heavenly temple, but from there John looks down on another set of earthly scenes: the seven angels pour out their bowls of wrath, bringing God’s final disasters and destruction.

Beings: Seven angels with bowls, those involved in the seven plague scenarios, the angel of the water, the people under the temple altar, and John.

Activity: A loud voice from the temple tells the seven angels, “Go and pour out on the earth the seven bowls of the wrath of God.” And they do.

The first bowl is poured on the earth, causing foul and evil sores to break out on the men who serve the beast. The second bowl is poured into the sea, turning it to blood, and killing everything in it. The third bowl is poured into the fresh water sources, and they too become blood. This action prompts the angel of the water to state the justice of God’s doing this, while the altar (ie, the souls under it: see 6:9) cries out: “Yea, Lord God the Almighty, true and just are thy judgments!”

The fourth bowl is poured on the sun, causing it to scorch men with fierce heat. They respond by cursing God, and do not repent. The fifth bowl is poured on the throne of the beast, turning its kingdom into darkness and causing men to gnaw their tongues in anguish. Again they respond by cursing God and do not repent.

The sixth bowl is poured on the great river Euphrates, drying up its waters and thereby preparing the way “for the kings of the east”. Three demonic spirits issue from the mouths of the dragon, the beast, and the false prophet, gathering “the kings of the whole world” and assembling them for battle against Almighty God at a place called Armageddon. Against this background of a “man versus God” showdown, the faithful are reminded: “Lo, I am coming like a thief! Blessed is he who is awake, keeping his garments that he may not go naked and be seen exposed!”

The seventh bowl is poured into the air, prompting a great voice in the heavenly temple to declare, “It is done!” There are simultaneous flashes of lightning, loud noises, peals of thunder, and a great unprecedented earthquake, which causes the great city Babylon to split into three parts and the cities of the nations to fall. The tidal waves generated by this earthquake smash every island and even every mountain on earth. Huge, hundred-pound hailstones fall on men, who curse God for this terrible but obviously heaven-sent plague.

Chapter 17

Setting: The wilderness.

Beings: One of the seven angels of Rev 16, the great harlot, the beast, the Lamb, and John.

Activity: John is taken by one of the seven angels into wilderness to see a great harlot, who has fornicated with the kings of the earth and whose promiscuous activity has made the “dwellers on earth” drunk. John sees a woman seated on a seven-headed, ten-horned scarlet beast. She is arrayed in purple and scarlet, bedecked with jewels, and holds “a golden cup filled with abominations and the impurities of her fornication”. Her forehead carries a name of mystery: “Babylon the great, mother of harlots and of earth’s abominations”. The woman is drunk with blood of the saints and the martyrs of Jesus.

John is evidently awestruck and mystified by the woman’s appearance and behavior. But then the angel explains: The woman is “the great city which has dominion over the kings of the earth”. The beast is the same seven-headed, ten-horned monster encountered before (13:1), and continues to fascinate its devotees, who marvel because “it was, and is not, and is to come”. The seven heads are interpreted to be “seven hills on which the woman is seated” and also “seven kings, five of whom have fallen, one which is, and the other which has not yet come”. The ten horns are stated to be “ten kings… who are to receive authority for one hour, together with the beast”. The waters where the harlot is seated are interpreted to be “peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues”.

The beast and the ten horns come to hate the harlot, and to “make her desolate and naked, devour her flesh and burn her up with fire”, according to God’s predetermined plan. Afterwards, they will make war on the Lamb, but he will conquer them. Details of this battle are provided in Rev 19.

Chapter 18

Setting: From his location on earth (still in the wilderness?), John hears and watches the destruction of the Babylon harlot.

Beings: An angel with great authority who will pronounce the destruction, a voice out of heaven, those associated with the destruction and lamentation of Babylon the great, those who rejoice over the fall of Babylon, a mighty angel who will cast the millstone, and John.

Activity: An angel with great authority comes down from heaven to the earth, making it bright with his splendor, and bringing the announcement of Babylon’s fall. Another voice from heaven makes an appeal to the faithful: “Come out of her, my people, lest you take part of her sins, lest you share in her plagues.” The reasons for God’s judgments upon her are then made very clear.

The kings of the earth who committed fornication with the harlot weep and wail when they see the smoke of her burning, and stand afar off in fear over her torment. The merchants of the earth likewise weep and mourn over her demise and torment. Shipmasters and seafaring men who traded with Babylon also cry out when they see the smoke of her burning: “Alas, alas, for the great city, where all who had ships at sea grew rich by her wealth! In one hour she has been laid waste.”

In striking contrast, the saints and apostles and prophets are urged to rejoice over Babylon’s fall, “for God has given judgment for you against her!” Then a mighty angel throws a great millstone into the sea as a symbolic end of the great city (guilty of the blood of the prophets and saints), declaring that “it shall be found no more.”

Chapter 19

Setting: The same location as in Rev 18, although there are also visions of what is happening in the throne room.

Beings: A great multitude in heaven, the 24 elders, the four living creatures, God on his throne, the angel who has been speaking with John, Jesus manifested as King of kings and Lord of lords, the armies of heaven, the beast, the false prophet, and their armies, an angel standing in the sun, and John.

Activity: John hears the mighty voice of what seems to be a great multitude (of angels and martyrs? see Rev 5:11; 16:7) in heaven rejoicing in the judgments of God and the destruction of the great harlot. The 24 elders and four living creatures fall down in worship and add their “Hallelujah!”

A voice from the throne calls for more praise, and the “Hallelujah!” response is tremendous. The voice of the great multitude is augmented by the sound of many waters and mighty thunder peals. It is time for great rejoicing, “for the marriage of the Lamb has come, and his Bride has made herself ready…” She is clothed with fine linen, bright and pure, as evidence of her righteous deeds and her surviving of the tribulation.

The angel who has been speaking with John now instructs him: “Write this: Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb.” He assures John that that statement is wonderfully true. John falls down at his feet, wanting to worship the angel, but he is told not to do so, since the angel is likewise a servant. Rather, John is told: “Worship God.”

A new scene begins. John sees heaven opened, and a white horse comes forth carrying a rider with flaming eyes, many crowns, and a blood-dipped robe. “And the armies of heaven, arrayed in fine linen, white and pure, followed him on white horses.” Their leader is called Faithful and True, the Word of God, King of kings and Lord of lords, “and in righteousness he judges and makes war.” From his mouth issues a sharp sword with which to smite the nations; he will rule them with a rod of iron.

An angel standing in the sun calls for the birds of the air to gather to eat the flesh of men and horses, as the scene changes to a showdown between the beast and its armies and the Lord and his armies. The beast is captured, along with the false prophet, and the two of them are thrown alive into the lake of fire. their army is slain, and the birds gorge themselves on the carcasses.

Chapter 20

Setting: Earth (the same location as Rev 19?), with scenes of the dragon’s binding, a judgment seat, the dragon’s loosing, another battle scene, another judgment, and the final end of Death and Hades (the grave).

Beings: An angel with a key and chain, the dragon, judges on thrones, martyrs of Jesus (see Rev 6:9-11), the nations deceived by the dragon, a being on a great white throne, the resurrected dead, and John.

Activity: First John sees an angel come down from heaven with the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain. He seizes the dragon, that ancient serpent, and binds it in the pit for a thousand years, knowing that it must be loosed again for a little while.

Next, John sees a judgment seat convened. Those who have lost their lives for the sake of Jesus and who have not worshipped the beast “come to life and reign with Christ a thousand years”. A special blessing is given to those who share in this first resurrection.

The scene changes. When the thousand years are ended, the dragon will be loosed from its prison, and come out to deceive the nations again. The dragon’s army march over the earth and surround the camp of the saints. Fire comes down from heaven and consumes them. The dragon is then thrown into the lake of fire where the beast and false prophet are.

John then sees a great white throne and another judgment take place, this time of all the resurrected dead. “If any one’s name is not found written in the book of life, he is thrown into the lake of fire.” Significantly, Death and Hades are themselves thrown into the lake of fire, which is the second death.

Chapter 21

Setting: Still earth (the same location as Rev 20?), the initial scene being a holy city coming down out of heaven. John is then taken to a great high mountain to see this holy city more closely.

Beings: God on his throne, one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls of plagues, the Bride (the holy city), and John.

Activity: John sees “a new heaven and a new earth”, with focus being on a new Jerusalem coming down out of heaven, pictured like a bride. John hears a great voice from heaven announcing that God himself has come to dwell with men, and will remove every tear and sorrow, and even death itself.

God declares, “Behold, I make all things new.” He then states how He will reward the faithful (those who conquer — recall Rev 2; 3) but punish the faithless, cowardly, polluted, etc. by extinction in the lake of fire.

The one of the seven bowl-angels speaks to John: “Come, I will show you the Bride, the wife of the Lamb.” He carries John “in the Spirit” to a great high mountain, where John again sees the holy city coming down out of heaven from God. The radiant, crystal city — with gates of pearl and streets of gold — is 15,000 miles long and equally wide and high! This city represents the people of God from both Old Testament and New Testament times (eg, gates with the names of the twelve tribes of Israel; foundations with the names of the twelve apostles). Only those whose names are written in the book of life shall enter it.

The city has no temple, “for its temple is the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb.” Similarly, it needs no sun or moon to shine upon it, since it has God as its light and the Lamb as its lamp. The city is open 24 hours a day for the nations to come for enlightenment.

Chapter 22

Setting: Earth. John finishes his tour of the new city and concludes with the final words of the angel and Jesus.

Beings: God on his throne, the Lamb, their servants (the Bride), Jesus’ angel, and John.

Activity: John is shown the river of the water of life flowing out from the throne of God and of the Lamb. It flows through the middle of the city, and has the tree of life (which bears fruit every month and leaves for healing) on each side of it. The redeemed of God — here called servants — manifest the reward of God’s name on their foreheads, and begin their reign with Christ.

Jesus’ angel assures John of the certainty of this victorious and glorious outcome, and restates, “Behold, I am coming soon!” John responds intuitively: “Blessed is he who keeps the words of the prophecy of this book.” Then once again, John attempts to worship the angel, who — likewise again — reminds him that as a fellow servant, he should direct his worship toward God instead.

In quick succession, there follow sober warnings and stirring exhortations. “Do not seal up the words of the prophecy of this book, for the time is near. Let the evildoer still do evil… and the righteous still do right.” “Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense, to repay everyone for what he has done.” “Blessed are those who wash their robes, that they may have the right to the tree of life…”

Then Jesus repeats what was said in the opening chapter, that he has sent his angel to John “with this testimony to the churches”. He explicitly declares one last time that “Surely I am coming soon,” and invites all those who wish for the return to join in and say, “Come.”

A solemn warning is given to anyone who might think to tamper with the contents or message of the Book. Then John declares his own “Amen. Come, Lord Jesus”, and ends with a benediction.

(NF)

Rev, certain, probable, and possible

The “Certain”

A fulfillment of prophecy can only be regarded as certain, for our finite and imperfect minds, when the fulfillment has already come about, or when its terms are absolutely incapable of any meaning save one; both factors would make our assurance doubly sure. Thus, we know that 2Sa 7:12-16 and its counterpart in 1Ch 17:11-14 were in part fulfilled in Solomon, because David so understood it in part (1Ch 28:6), as did Solomon himself (2Ch 6:9-11). We know that it was not entirely fulfilled in Solomon because David clearly looked beyond Solomon’s time (2Sa 7:19), and because the New Testament tells us explicitly that it referred to Jesus (Acts 13:33; Heb 1:5). Again, we know that the Bible promises the literal return of the Jews to the land of Israel, and of the Lord Jesus Christ to the earth, and many other such things plainly taught in Scripture because the terms of these prophecies do not admit of any other faithful interpretation.

The “Probable”

A fulfillment can be regarded as probable when the events we see in history are seen to correspond closely with the terms of a prophecy. Thus, it is hard to see that we could be mistaken in regarding the presence of some millions of Jews in the Holy Land today as, in part at least, a fulfillment of the prophecies of their return. It is probable, too, that this heralds the near return of the Lord. Some prophecies about the return of Israel to the land contain such apparently plain indications that they must suffer great afflictions before the final deliverance from their enemies (Eze 36-39; Zec 14), that we consider it probable that they will in fact suffer in this way.

The “Possible”

Things “possible” may have all degrees of likelihood from high probability to being highly unlikely, and the decision we come to in any particular case is bound to be in some degree subjective. We can hardly expect absolute unanimity, even among those sharing the same doctrinal foundation. Thus… it is possible to regard the “sun, moon and stars” of Rev 6:12,13 as referring to the nation of Israel; it is also possible to doubt this, since the symbols are certainly not invariably used in this sense in Scripture. Which conclusion we come to (if we come to a precise conclusion at all) is not, however, of the first importance, since other passages state in plain terms what may or may not here be intended by the symbols.

Indeed, it is not at all unlikely that we are sometimes moved to understand symbols in a particular way because we have already concluded on what are quite different grounds that certain things are true: in that event it is not the symbols which are teaching us, but we who are reading (right or wrong) our own meaning into them. This fault is more common than we sometimes realize, and we should be on our guard against it.

Within the category of “possible”, too, must be put all detailed predictions of things yet future which are not most categorically defined in Scripture itself — unless, indeed, our predictions are so outrageous as not to be thought possible at all. And in view of the fact that the New Testament often provides us with interpretations of Old Testament prophecies which we should not have thought of for ourselves (such as those of Hos 11:1 in Mat 2:15; and of Jer 31:15 in Mat 2:18), we need to be very careful before we pronounce any interpretation impossible. Even so, since it required the guidance of the Holy Spirit to enable New Testament writers to offer such interpretations to us, we might feel that our own feet should re-main firmly on the ground when we are disposed to adventure our own understanding of Scripture’s prophecies.

Since [in interpreting prophecy] we will be meeting events which certainly lie, in the future… it follows that detailed interpretations are bound to be speculative in some degree, even when they are offered at all. It might even be that no detailed interpretation is possible. But this is not in itself to be regarded as any weakness in the expository basis: it may simply be that information is inadequate for any assurance as to the meaning until the events have actually occurred.

To this it cannot properly be objected that a prophecy which one can only understand when it has happened is of little use. For in the first place its general tenor may be plain even when the detail is not; and in the second place it can be very valuable and reassuring to know that we have reached a certain point in the fulfillment of God’s purpose, and can look forward now to the next stage.

(NRev 131-133).

Rev, date of

Eur 1:36: Iraneus (c 169 AD) is said to have introduced the opinion that Apocalypse was written in reign of Domitian (80-96). Isaac Newton does not adopt Iraneus’s opinion: he suggests Iraneus might have heard from Polycarp that he had received the Apocalypse from John about time of Domitian’s death or that John might at that time have made a new publication of it. Eusebius (3rd/4th cent) adopts Iraneus’s opinion (but is thought by some to invalidate it by conjoining the banishing of John to Patmos with the deaths of Peter and Paul).

Eur 1:37: “There is no evidence to show how long he was an exile, or in what year of his sojourn in Patmos the Apocalypse was given.”

P 38: Tertullian says John was banished to Patmos by Nero (65 AD). Arethas quotes Iraneus from Eusebius, but does not follow it: he affirms Apocalypse was written before the destruction of Jerusalem. Syriac Version in title of Apocalypse states: “into which (Patmos) he was banished by Nero.

P 39: Isaac Newton: “It seems probable to me that the Apocalypse was there composed (ie in Patmos) and that soon after, the epistle to Hebrews and those of Peter were written, with ref to this prophecy as what they were particularly concerned in.”

P 40: In conclusion, JT: “It cannot be said with certainty in what year the Apocalypse was written.” (He means, from context, a date of 65 or 67 is quite possible.) JT: “The knowledge of these particular times does not at all affect the interpretation.”

WRev 53: “The date of the writing of Rev is of fundamental importance, vitally affecting the interpretation of the book.”

P 54: 2 objections to Iraneus’s testimony: (1) his doubtful value as a witness: (a) he insists Christ died at age 50; (b) he gives credence to the fantastic story of the miraculous translation of the LXX; and (2) possible mistranslation: Instead of “it was not long since it — Apocalypse — was seen, but almost within our own generation, about the end of Domitian’s reign”…the passage could read: “It was not long since HE — John — was seen…

The book was received during a time of intense persecution (ie 1:9), and the Neronian persecutions were the only such in the 1st century.

Ellicott, vol 8, p 526: Theophylact: John was in Patmos 32 years after ascension. Also, argument by comparing Rev 2; 3 to Eph and Col (also in Asia Minor): Since very little change in conditions, the general weight is in favor of earlier date.

Clarke (6:960,961): “So many conflicting opinions.”

IBD: “External evidence — Iraneus’s being the earliest — support later date.”

ISBE: Iraneus is confirmed by Clement, Origen, etc.

Hastings (IV, 259): “The efforts to force Emperor worship upon Jews goes back to Caligula (39,40 AD).” (But ct Peake, p 928.)

1. Fulfillment Would Be “Soon”: Many verses throughout the Book stress the immediacy, and the extreme urgency, of its message: Rev 1:1,3; 2:16; 3:11; 6:10,11; 22:10,12,20. How was the prophecy fulfilled “soon”? How was it “near” in the days when John received it? The obvious answer is that the Apocalypse was fulfilled (partially, at least) within a very short time after it was given. If it were written in AD 66, the events of AD 70 would certainly be considered as happening soon!

2. Authenticity of a Prophet: A very common pattern with all Bible prophecy is this: one more-or-less immediate fulfillment, usually only partial, in the days of the prophet himself, and another fulfillment much later, often related to the Second Coming of Christ. The Olivet prophecy is notable in this regard. An immediate fulfillment (ie, within at most one generation of its proclamation) was absolutely essential for every prophecy, no matter what it might mean to much later generations — for how else could a would-be prophet prove his credentials to his original listeners? See Deu 18:19-22. So a prophecy, even one written by the Apostle John, would have needed some significant fulfillment within a few years — or the churches would have been well within their rights to reject it as a false prophecy! If the Apocalypse were given, and received, shortly before AD 67, then soon-to-come events would have validated it almost immediately. But if the Apocalypse were given about AD 95 or 96, and especially if it were designed for a single, long, almost imperceptibly slow working-out spanning 1,900 years, where would be any real test of authenticity to the generation first receiving it?

3. Jesus Did “Come” in AD 70: Upon his resurrection, Jesus was given “all authority in heaven and earth” by God (Mat 28:18). Earlier, he had twice declared that the Father had placed all judgment into his hands, in order that “the Son may be honored” (Joh 5:22,23,27). In his parable about the rebellious city, Jesus predicted the destruction of Jerusalem (Mat 22:1-7). As the Son of God, Jesus sent his destroying army (the Romans) against Jerusalem. As a prophet, Jesus had to be proven right — and he was! So in the sense of bringing God’s judgment (in order to induce repentance among the people), Jesus did “come” in AD 70.

4. The Theme Verse of the Apocalypse: “Look, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him; and all the peoples of the earth will mourn because of him. So shall it be! Amen” (Rev 1:7). This verse is a composite of two Old Testament prophecies, and is demonstrably a theme verse for the whole Book. The first half of the verse quotes from Dan 7:1. The rest of Revelation is based on Christ’s glory with God in heaven and his imminent return to earth in that same glory.

The second half of Rev 1:7 is derived from Zec 12:10-14. The recognition that Jesus is the Messiah brings the Jews to repentance. “Those who pierced him” means the Jews (Mat 26:14, 15,47; 27:2-12,62-66; Joh 18:39,40; 19:6; Act 2:22, 23,36; 3:13-15; 1Th 2:14,15). “The peoples of the earth” (in Rev) and “the clans of the land” (in Zec) are the same! They are the Jewish tribes (cp Rev 5:5; 7:4-8; 21:12), in contrast to “every tribe, tongue, nation, etc.” (Rev 5:9; 7:9; 13:7; 14:6). So a key opening verse in the Rev declares a “coming” of the Lord Jesus to the people of Israel, in Israel. The connection of Revelation 1:7 with the words of Jesus in his Olivet prophecy is unmistakable: Mat 24:30. Since Jesus was predicting the impending overthrow of Jerusalem (in AD 70), then this theme verse must also be part of a message predicting the imminent judgment of God upon Israel. Thus, Rev 1:7, properly seen with its OT links, may have much to say about the scope and the setting of the Book — and thus also about the date of its writing. Since the Book seems to be dealing with God’s judgments upon His people Israel, in their own land, because they have rejected His Son, then the only logical time for its writing in the first century would be before the great outpouring of those judgments, in AD 70. [See Rev, theme verse.]

5. A Judaizing Element in Revelation: Rev 2:9 and Rev 3:9 presume that there was a strong Judaizing element in the Church when John was writing. These were prob Christian brethren whose influence depended in large part on the existence of a Temple and a priesthood in Jerusalem, and whose influence would have been considerably reduced later, after Jerusalem fell in AD 70.

6. A Temple in Jerusalem: Rev 11:1-3 likewise presumes the existence, at the time of writing, of the great Temple in Jerusalem (cp Luk 21:20,21,24). This Temple was of course destroyed by the Romans in AD 70.

7. Other Pre-AD 70 Letters Quote Revelation: Several letters which were undoubtedly written before AD 70 appear to quote extensively from Revelation:

Hebrews… quotes from… Revelation
The Word of God (Heb 4:12) (= Jesus: Heb 4:13) The Word of God (= Jesus: Rev 19:13)
…is sharper than a two-edged sword (Heb 4:12) …with a sharp two-edged sword (Rev 1:16; 19:15)
The city which hath (the: RV) foundations, whose builder and maker is God (Heb 11:10) The wall of the city (of God) had 12 foundations (Rev 21:14)

And this whole sequence from Heb 12:

Mount Zion The Lamb on Mount Zion (Rev 14:1)
Heavenly Jerusalem New Jerusalem out of heaven (Rev 21:2)
The city of the living God The God of the living creatures (Rev 4:6)
An innumerable company of angels The voice of many angels (Rev 5:11)
The general assembly The 144,000 sealed out of Israel (Rev 7; 14)
Written in heaven Written in the Lamb’s book of life (Rev 13:8; 21:27)
God the Judge of all The dead standing before God, to be judged (Rev 20:12)
Jesus the mediator of a new covenant A Lamb as it had been slain (Rev 5:5,6)
The blood of sprinkling Thou hast redeemed us to God by thy blood (Rev 5:9)
Him that spoke from heaven Revelation is the only message of Jesus spoken from heaven!´
Let us serve God They serve Him day and night in His temple (Rev 7:15)

1 Peter quotes from… Revelation
Things angels desire to look into (1Pe 1:12) Angel: “Who is worthy to open the book?” (Rev 5:2)
Faith… gold tried in the fire (1Pe 1:7) Buy gold tried in the fire (Rev 3:18)
Living stones (1Pe 2:5) City with 12 foundations, and in them the names of the apostles (Rev 21:14)
A royal priesthood (1Pe 2:9) Kings and priests (Rev 5:10; 1:6)
Redeemed with the precious blood of Christ as of a Lamb (1Pe 1:19) A Lamb as it had been slain… Thou hast redeemed us (Rev 5:6,9)
The foundation of the world (1Pe 1:20) The foundation of the world (Rev 13:8)
To him be glory and dominion for ever and ever (1Pe 5:11) To him be glory and dominion for ever and ever (Rev 1:6)
Babylon (1Pe 5:13) Babylon the Great (Rev 17:5)

2 Peter quotes… Revelation
The more sure word of prophecy, whereunto ye do well to take heed… (2Pe 1:19) The Apocalypse itself? (What other “sure word of prophecy” could it be?)
The day star (2Pe 1:19) The bright and morning star (Rev 2:28; 22:16)
False prophets (2Pe 2:1) The false prophet (Rev 16:13; 19:20)
Angels… cast down to hell (2Pe 2:4) The devil and Satan… cast into a bottomless pit (Rev 20:1-3)
Brute beasts made to be destroyed (2Pe 2:12) The beast and false prophet and dragon… destroyed (Rev 13:11; 19:20; 20:10)
The way of Balaam (2Pe 2:15) The doctrine of Balaam (Rev 2:14)
A thousand years (2Pe 3:8) A thousand years (Rev 20:3,5,6)
A thief in the night (2Pe 3:10) I will come as a thief (Rev 3:3; 16:15)
The heavens shall pass away with a great noise (2Pe 3:10) The heaven fled away (Rev 20:11; 21:1)
We, according to his promise (where?), look for a new heavens and a new earth (2Pe 3:13) A new heaven and a new earth (Rev 21:1)

Quite a number of the correspondences suggested above are the only occurrences of those phrases in all of the NT, and indeed, in some cases, in all of the Bible. While one or two such allusions could be attributed to mere coincidence, the (1) virtual uniqueness and (2) cumulative effect of many such allusions strengthen dramatically the case for the other writers quoting Revelation. This line of reasoning was first hinted at by Sir Isaac Newton in his writings on prophecy, and later expanded in WRev:

“It is possible to identify many allusions to the Book of Revelation in Hebrews and in the two epistles of Peter. If this assertion can be established as true, then Revelation must predate the three epistles mentioned. Since Peter definitely died in Nero’s persecution of AD 64-66 approx (much of his First Epistle was to strengthen the brethren in that fiery trial) and since Hebrews is generally admitted to have been written before the Jewish War of AD 67-70, the dating of Revelation is narrowed down to a very fine margin.

“…It may be as well to dispose of the only way of upsetting this argument. It could perhaps be suggested that whilst the links between Revelation and the three epistles may be undoubted, the facts are capable of the reverse interpretation, namely, that Revelation is borrowing from Hebrews and 1st and 2nd Peter… The answer to this comes from careful consideration of the character of the phrases under review. Practically all of them will be seen at once to be ‘Apocalyptic’ in style — they belong naturally to Revelation, they are in keeping with its idiom and symbolism: e.g. ‘the morning star’. Further, when they occur in the three epistles they often introduce matters which have received no mention whatever in their context but which are fully explained in Revelation, eg ‘the city which hath the foundations, whose builder and maker is God’ ” (WRev 55).

Questions About an Early Date

But the idea that the Revelation had a first-century fulfillment — in the Neronian persecution of the Church and the Jewish Wars of AD 67 to 70 — leads to a quite logical question: ‘Why didn’t the Kingdom of God — clearly so much a part of the Apocalypse — come in the first century?’

The answer is: it might have, if the conditions had been right. As JT wrote in Elp: “Had the nation [of Israel] continued to obey the Lord’s voice and to keep the covenant, and when Christ came, received him as king on the proclamation of the gospel, they would doubtless have been in Canaan until now [written in 1848]; and he might have come ere this, and be now reigning in Jerusalem, King of the Jews and Lord of the nations” (Elp 301, 11th ed).

So, ‘does the fact that the Kingdom of God didn’t come in the first century mean that the Apocalypse was in reality a false prophecy, ie, a prophecy not to be fulfilled?’

The answer, again, is: NO!: Sometimes, even though a particular prophecy is plainly from God and therefore inspired, it will not be completely fulfilled (at least, not at the time first anticipated) because those to whom the fulfillment of blessing should come have not properly prepared themselves to receive that blessing — or, conversely, because those upon whom the fulfillment of punishment should come have repented, and sought to be released from the judgment of God: Jer 18:7-10. A well-known case in point is the prophecy of Jonah, directed against the wicked city of Nineveh (the capital of Assyria): Jon 3:1-4. But the time for the destruction of Nineveh came and went, and the mighty city still stood, much to Jonah’s chagrin. Why? Was God’s word void? Of course not! Instead, the city, from king to slave, had repented in sackcloth and begged the mercy of God (3:5-9). And He had listened (3:10). [For more on this approach to Bible prophecy, see WRev 259-273.]

This, of course, leads to one last question: ‘If a first-century (and partial) fulfillment is a proper interpretation of the Book, then can there be any other interpretation which in any sense is also “soon” and “near”?’

YES! And the explanation is ready-at-hand, and easily grasped: see Luke 21:29-32. The Olivet prophecy is generally recognized to have two fulfillments (one in the first century and another in the near future). Likewise, the Apocalypse (which, not coincidentally, shares many points in common with the Olivet prophecy) may also have two fulfillments. The second, or Last Days, fulfillment may rightly be spoken of as “soon” or “near” if considered in relation to the proper starting point. So, to paraphrase the quotation above: ‘When you see the rebirth of the nation of Israel in the Last Days, and especially when you see Jerusalem in Jewish hands again, and again encircled by threatening enemies [cp Luk 21:20-24]… — that is, when conditions in the Middle East mirror the state of affairs in Jesus’ day — … then know that the fulfillment of all things is, from that time, very near — even upon that very generation!’

The Importance?

Why is the dating of Revelation important? Because, given the early date for its writing (AD 65/66), the Book may be seen to have had an immediate fulfillment, which then greatly influences what we may expect as its final fulfillment. In other words, the Last Days fulfillment should follow the pattern of the first century fulfillment. We can expect then:

  1.         An attack by Gentile enemies upon Jerusalem.

  2.         A downtreading period corresponding to 3 1/2 literal years (also designated as 42 months and 1,260 days).

  3.         Severe trials upon Jews living in the Land of Israel, and tribulations which may spread to the rest of the world.

  4.         Witnessing (preaching) which converts those who will listen (both Jew and Gentile) to believe in God and the Lord Jesus Christ.

  5.         Judgments upon the enemies of God’s people in and around the Land of Israel.

The difference will be that, whereas the first century fulfillment stopped short of the actual Return of Christ, the final fulfillment will go on to the completion of the purpose of God. Jesus will return in glory, the dead will be raised for reward or punishment, the nations will be judged, and God’s Kingdom will be established!

Thus the Apocalypse is seen to gather together the threads of many Old Testament prophecies, and to weave them into a sequence of events that fit both the first century and the Last Days. Rather than clashing with, or standing as a contrast to, the OT prophetic picture, the Apocalypse is seen to extend and enhance it. Rather than being a mystical book, with relevance only to a few Bible scholars, the Apocalypse is seen to be quite understandable and applicable to “every tribe, tongue, people, and nation”!

Evidence for a later date:

The AD 95 date rests almost entirely on the testimony of the early Church “father” Iraneus (c AD 180) — generally considered by today’s scholars to be a rather unreliable witness. Iraneus wrote concerning John: “We will not, however, incur the risk of pronouncing positively as to the name of Antichrist; for if it were necessary that his name should be distinctly revealed in this present time, it would have been announced by him who beheld the apocalyptic vision. For it was seen not very long ago, but almost in our day, towards the end of Domitian’s reign.”

This is often assumed to fix the date when the Revelation itself was “seen” as “towards the end of Domitian’s reign”, that is, in AD 95 or 96. But the Greek text itself is ambiguous as to the key pronoun and its antecedent; it could as easily read: “…For he [ie, the apostle John himself] was seen not very long ago…” — thus saying nothing about when the Book of Revelation was written, but only about how long its author lived! (Several later “fathers” simply quote Iraneus, perpetuating the same ambiguity; their witnesses are therefore not really independent.)