2 Corinthians 10

2Co 10:1

MEEKNESS: See Lesson, Gentleness.

2Co 10:3

Vv 3-6: “We do have to walk in this fleshly body which leads to corruption. But so did Christ our Savior. The weapon we have against the flesh is the powerful two-edged sword of the Word of God. Christ showed us how to wield it against unpure thoughts. He also showed us that in prayer we can find strength and answers to our dilemmas of this fleshly existence. These weapons can help us to take captive every thought to the obedience of Christ! What great assurance that is. These divinely powerful weapons can help us through each day. We can not do it by ourselves, but we can give it to God and he will prevail! We can walk today in Christ’s path, guided by the Father, and make our thoughts captive to the obedience of Christ today because we are assured that the divinely powerful weapons are able to destroy the fortress of our flesh. We can be complete in our obedience to God and be willing to punish our disobedience. It is not easy to let go of the flesh since it is part of who we are. But obedience to God can create new parts in us as we become new creatures to God. The new man can push out the old man. And the power to accomplish this is from the Father — not of ourselves. What a gracious and loving Father who is willing to pave the way for us sinful, fleshly men. His grace is unsearchable!” (CPv).

2Co 10:4

STRONGHOLDS: This word used only once in LXX: “the fenced cities” like Jericho (Jos 10:20).

2Co 10:5

WE TAKE CAPTIVE EVERY THOUGHT: Our thoughts are portrayed as runaway “slaves” — which must be pursued, captured, and forced back into obedience to Christ.

2Co 10:10

Frailties of Paul: 2Co 11:6; 12:7,9.

2Co 10:12

Let us not compare ourselves with one another — that is, with the brethren and sisters around us; that is not wise. Such actions foster judgmentalism and pride. By this course, a community’s standards of conduct and holiness and service and sacrifice gradually and imperceptibly sink lower and lower toward the way of the flesh, in blind complacence.

Let us rather constantly and honestly compare our service and way of life with the holy precepts of the Word, and with the humbling and mortifying examples of Christ and of Paul; these are specifically set before us as patterns to copy and standards of comparison (cp 1Co 11:1). This way a community’s devotion and service are gradually lifted higher and higher, growing and developing toward the Spirit of God, going on “from glory to glory” (2Co 2:18).

WE DO NOT DARE TO CLASSIFY OR COMPARE OURSELVES…: Paul contrasts himself with such as these. Earlier, he has observed that he did not need — as some seemed to think they did — a letter of commendation (2Co 3:1).

“I once heard the story of a boy who was short for his age and wanted to be taller. All his friends were at least 10 cm taller than he was. (No, it wasn’t me!) He finally came up with an idea that appeared to solve his problem. His solution was to make a new ruler to measure himself. His ruler meant that he was now 20 cm taller than he was before because he had measured himself with a different standard.

“As Christians, the standard we should be measuring ourselves against is Christ. He was the model of perfection. Our aim must be to be like him and even though we will never reach his standard, it must be our aim. But sometimes we can lose sight of the standard we should compare ourselves to and set up new standards for ourselves. We may measure our progress by what we were like last week or last year or against our worst day. Or we may look at ourselves and compare ourselves to the people around us. But Paul warns us about doing that… Our standard is Christ. Let’s not fool ourselves with our own comparisons, but reach for the high standard of Christ” (RP).

2Co 10:14

WE DID GET AS FAR AS YOU WITH THE GOSPEL: By ct, the Judaizers were “comic little men, still straining… themselves to reach Corinth,” while Paul had begun the work there but had now gone further yet, to open up more new areas (WFB).

Galatians 1

Gal 1:1

See Lesson, Paul the man.

See Lesson, Paul’s ecclesial letters.

“This epistle has been like ‘living fire’ again and again in quickening men to vital thinking when the deadening influence of ritual was destroying spiritual life” (CGal 142). Paul’s “angry voice”.

See VL, Christ’s resurrection, reality.

Notice: no words of praise, in ct 1Th 1:1; 1Co 1:2; etc.

Paul’s changing self-image: (1) an apostle (Gal 1:1; etc), (2) least of the apostles (1Co 15:9), (3) less than the least of all the saints (Eph 3:8), (4) worst of sinners (1Ti 1:15). As Paul drew nearer to Christ, so his self-esteem decreased.

BY JESUS CHRIST: To counter criticism that Paul’s apostleship was derived and secondary.

Gal 1:2

TO THE CHURCHES IN GALATIA: This was what we might call a “circular” letter — being sent to the “churches” of Galatia. From that we should conclude that all meetings in Galatia needed the same issues covered.

We must be aware that different ecclesias have differing problems and needs. So what may be a problem in one ecclesia may not be in another. From this we conclude that ecclesial problems are best resolved by those who are in the area rather than by outside involvement by those who only have limited knowledge of the needs.

Notice that the ground-breaking letter which was generated at the “Jerusalem council” (Acts 15:30) was only sent to the ecclesia where there was a problem with the integration of Gentiles into the ecclesia, though its contents must have been well known throughout Asia because of the two references to it in Rev 2:14,20.

Gal 1:8

AN ANGEL FROM HEAVEN: How could this happen? But a man could claim angelic visitation as a pretense for teaching error (cp the old prophet in 1Ki 13:18: “an angel said to me”).

LET HIM BE ETERNALLY CONDEMNED: “A man denies an obvious mathematical statement, and he displays dullness of intellect. But if a man denies the essential truths of salvation when they are made known in a revelation authenticated as true by many evidences, his fault passes from the intellectual to the moral plane. As it is a moral fault to deny God’s way, it becomes a moral necessity to uphold it. Its defence and maintenance is nothing less than taking the side of God, and a refusal to do so is joining the enemies of God” (CGal 35).

Gal 1:9

ETERNALLY CONDEMNED: Note contrasting attitudes: the teacher is cursed (cp Tit 1:11; 1Ti 1:3,20), but misled followers are reproached and warned (Gal 1:6; 3:1).

Gal 1:10

Paul is prob quoting his critics: “win approval”, “please”, etc.

SERVANT OF CHRIST: “Doulos” = bond-slave. This description emphasizes submission and dependence on their Lord. It is not a technical reference to a specific office, but characterizes their willing service of Christ, their divine Master. The same designation appears in the letters of James, 2Pe, and Jude.

Man’s slave becomes free in Christ, and a freeman (like Paul) becomes Christ’s slave (1Co 7:22).

The use of the term “slaves” also suggests the “redemptive” work of God in Christ: the Israelites were “slaves” in Egypt, who were “bought” or “redeemed” out of their slavery to become the “purchased possession” of the Father (Exo 15:16). (See Lesson, Redemption.)

Gal 1:13

DESTROY: “Portheo” = “make havoc” (sw Act 9:21; Gal 1:23).

Gal 1:17

ARABIA: Perhaps even as far as Sinai, in view of Gal 4:25.

Gal 1:20

Paul’s honesty had been called in question.

Galatians 4

Gal 4:2

HE IS SUBJECT TO GUARDIANS AND TRUSTEES UNTIL THE TIME SET BY HIS FATHER: …As Jesus was subject to Mary and Joseph: Luk 2:51.

Gal 4:4

BORN UNDER LAW: Cp 2Co 5:19-21; Rom 8:3.

Gal 4:5

REDEEM: Gr “exagorazo” = to buy out of the agora, or marketplace. See Lesson, Redemption.

THOSE UNDER LAW: In addition to being redeemed from sin and wickedness and the world and men (see refs, Lesson, Redemption) man was also redeemed from the Law of Moses, and from the “curse” of that Law. But the Law itself was not evil (it was holy and just and good: Rom 7:12-14); however, the Law brought into focus and highlighted man’s sin; thus it came to stand — by metonymy — for his sin.

THE FULL RIGHTS OF SONS: We are “sons of God” by adoption. If we belong to Christ, ie, if we are his “offspring” (ie, Isa 53:10; Psa 22:30,31), then we likewise belong to God, as His dear children (Rom 8:16-23). Think of it in terms of the genealogies of Jesus: According to Mat 1, Jesus is the 42nd generation from Abraham, and that would make each of us the 43rd generation! According to Luke 3, Jesus is the 77th generation from Adam, and that makes us, by the same kind of reckoning, the 78th generation! And Adam was “born of God”, although plainly in a different way than was Jesus… so there’s a relationship to God through Adam too, although perhaps not so lovely! Remember, Adam was created “in the image and likeness” of God (Gen 1:26; 5:1), but by the time he sinned, his son was born in Adam’s (fallen) image (Gen 5:3), which was something different, sadly. But then… best of all: “But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth” (Joh 1:12-14). Because Jesus was (and is) Son of God [the Word made flesh: Joh 1:14!], we are “sons (and daughters!) of God” too [because His “Word”, planted in our minds and hearts of flesh, caused us to be “born from above”]! Jesus is — on his father’s side — the FIRST generation from God! And we are… only… the 2nd generation! Think of it as being heir to a vast fortune. On one side of our family, each of us is the 43rd lineal descendant, and heir of the world promised to Abraham (Rom 4:13). But… on the other side of the family, we are — each one of us — a specially beloved grandson or granddaughter of Almighty God. Between the two, I’d say we’ve got it made!

Gal 4:6

ABBA: Aram “father”. Esp a name by which God was addressed in prayer. Only 3 times in NT text: Mar 14:36; Rom 8:15; Gal 4:6. But this Aram term may lie behind numerous refs to God as Father where only the Gr “Pater” is given in the NT.

See Article, Abba, Father.

Gal 4:8

SLAVES TO THOSE WHO BY NATURE ARE NOT GODS: “A hard ceremonial idolatry” — described in CGal 102.

Gal 4:9

WEAK AND MISERABLE PRINCIPLES: Both idolatry and observance of Law of Moses were slavery to systems of salvation by works.

Gal 4:12

I BECAME LIKE YOU: That is, I was in bondage to Law also.

Gal 4:13

AN ILLNESS: Ramsay suggests an intermittent malaria that forced Paul to interrupt his trip and seek the higher ground of the interior (CGal 106).

Gal 4:16

YOUR ENEMY: Prob his opponents’ description.

Gal 4:17

ZEALOUS TO WIN YOU OVER: Paul’s opponents taught that the Galatians were excluded from salvation unless they kept the Law (cp Mat 23:15).

WHAT THEY WANT IS TO ALIENATE YOU FROM US: ‘We would dearly love to have association with you, but you will need to be rid of the pestilential fellow Paul first!’ ‘Agree with us, or else!’

Gal 4:21

THE LAW: Ref first 5 books of Bible, including Genesis!

Gal 4:25

PRESENT CITY OF JERUSALEM: The Jerusalem which still followed the Law received at Sinai.

Gal 4:26

SHE IS OUR MOTHER: Cp “Eve”, figurative bride of Christ: the “mother” of all living (Gen 3:20n), as regards Christ the seed of Gen 3:15. Cp idea, Rom 16:13 (his mother, and mine); Isa 66:7,8,13; Psa 87:2-6.

Galatians 3

Gal 3:1

CLEARLY PORTRAYED: “Prographo” = written up on a placard; set forth for all the world to see! Christ lifted up on a cross (Joh 3:14; 12:32).

CRUCIFIED: A ref to Isa 53! In Gal 3:2, “believing what you heard” = “believed our message” (Isa 53:1).

Gal 3:4

See Act 14:2,5,22; Rom 5:3,4; Heb 12:6.

Gal 3:6

Man is justified by faith (vv 6,8), but cursed by law (v 10).

Gal 3:8

ALL NATIONS WILL BE BLESSED THROUGH YOU: “[This] was God’s promise to Abraham before he left his native Ur to go to the land of promise (Gen 12:3). This purpose was repeated as the ground of God’s communication concerning the overthrow of Sodom. ‘Shall I hide from Abraham that thing which I do; seeing that Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him?’ (Gen 18:17,18). What is the blessing here promised? We perhaps think firstly of the material blessings of Christ’s reign, the era of peace, the establishment of justice, the abundance of food; houses for all; security based on law; the removal of tyranny, bloodshed, oppression and torture of all forms; the bringing of enlightenment, and love of the things that are best to all. It is true that these things are included, as the glowing pictures of the prophets of the coming age abundantly show: but they are not the first or the most important blessing. Paul quotes the words… as proof that God would justify the Gentiles through faith. ‘All the nations’ included Gentiles as well as Jews — clearly, therefore, the blessing of Abraham is for Gentiles. The proof that God would justify them lies in the word ‘blessed’ — in other words, when God said the nations would be blessed the promise concerned the justification of the nations” (CGal 66).

Gal 3:11

THE RIGHTEOUS WILL LIVE BY FAITH: The central affirmation of Habakkuk is the last part of Hab 2:4: ‘the righteous will live by his faith.’ There are three key words in this affirmation: righteous, live, and faith. It is interesting that in the three places where this verse is quoted in the NT, in each case a different word receives the emphasis: (1) In Rom 1:17, the emphasis is on ‘righteous.’ Paul’s concern in Romans was with the righteousness of God and how people can obtain it. (2) In Gal 3:11, the emphasis is on ‘faith.’ Paul contrasted salvation by works and salvation by faith in Galatians. (3) And in Heb 10:38, the emphasis is on ‘live.’ The writer to the Hebrews stressed the importance of living by faith as a way of life rather than turning back to Judaism and living by the Law.

Thus we can see that this statement is packed with meaning. In fact, many people believe that this verse expresses the central theme of the entire Bible.

This verse may be amplified thusly: “The righteous (ie, those who are justified and declared righteous by God — being absolved of their sins) shall live (ie, NOW, in their daily lives of faith, and in the FUTURE, in the day of resurrection and glory) by their faith (ie, by acknowledging their utter dependence upon the LORD).”

Gal 3:13

REDEEMED: The Greek “exagorazo”, which literally means ‘to buy out of the agora, or marketplace’. This is one of the most powerful pictures, or parables, in the New Testament: that of the sinner as a “slave to Sin”, where “Sin” is personified as the powerful but ruthless Master to whom allegiance is owed — who brutalizes his “property” and gives it at last only “death”. “I am unspiritual, sold as a slave to sin” (Rom 7:14). In this metaphor Paul is recalling the words of Jesus: “Everyone who sins is a slave to sin” (Joh 8:34).

“But thanks be to God that, though you used to be slaves to sin, you wholeheartedly obeyed the form of teaching to which you were entrusted. You have been set free from sin and have become slaves to righteousness” (Rom 6:17,18). Christ has come into the “agora”, or marketplace, and purchased the sinner out of his bondage; now he has a new Master (Christ himself), and a new life.

CHRIST REDEEMED US FROM THE CURSE OF THE LAW: In addition to being redeemed from sin and wickedness and the world and men (Tit 2:14; Heb 9:15; Rev 14:3,4), man was also redeemed from the Law of Moses (Gal 4:5), and from the “curse” of that Law (Gal 3:13).

But the Law itself was not evil (it was holy and just and good: Rom 7:12-14). However, the Law brought into focus and highlighted man’s sin — in effect, making him a “sinner”. Thus it came to stand — by metonymy (putting the cause for the effect) — for his sin.

By coming under the curse of the Law — more or less artificially, and in the manner of his death only — whilst living a perfectly righteous life… Christ effectively removed that curse, and made it meaningless. And thus he did the same for those who are “in Christ” also.

Gal 3:14

BLESSING: Forgiveness of sins: Rom 4:1-3.

Gal 3:16

Promises to Abraham in NT: Christ confirms promises (Rom 15:8); great and precious promises (2Pe 1:4); God’s covenant promises re Israel (Rom 9:4); no covenant = no hope (Eph 2:12).

Gal 3:17

THE LAW, INTRODUCED 430 YEARS LATER, DOES NOT SET ASIDE THE COVENANT PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED BY GOD: The promise to Abraham, which might also be called the covenant with Abraham, was pronounced 430 years before the other covenant made with Moses and Israel, described in Exodus 24. Yet — strangely — the covenant made with Moses is treated as the older covenant, whereas that made with Abraham — though spoken much, much earlier — is treated as the newer covenant. And the reason would seem to be this: that the Mosaic covenant was confirmed IMMEDIATELY, in the sprinkled blood of the sacrifices, and in the fellowship meal, whereas the Abrahamic covenant was not confirmed when first given.

To illustrate, think of two contracts, one drawn up in, say, 1950, BUT NOT SIGNED AND SEALED; and the other drawn up in, say, 1960, and signed and sealed immediately. The 1950 contract — though all ready to be legalized, remains unsigned and unwitnessed until, let us say, 1980 — and so, in that sense, when it is finalized, it becomes the newer and later contract, although written first.

So the Mosaic covenant was confirmed immediately. But the covenant made by God with Abraham (like the 1950 contract in the illustration) was not so confirmed at the beginning; rather, it had to be taken on faith by Abraham and his descendants — in fact, Paul and other New Testament writers make much of this fact: that Abraham was justified by his FAITH in what God had promised (see, for example, Rom 4), although he never received what was promised, but only saw it afar off (Heb 11:13).

The covenant with Abraham could only be confirmed — “signed and sealed and delivered”, so to speak — by the shed blood of the covenant-victim, which was the Lord Jesus Christ (so Paul argues in Gal 3:1,13,16,19,20). Thus may be understood the words of Jesus: “This is the new covenant in MY blood!” And since nothing can replace or supplant it, once it has been confirmed and established, this Abrahamic covenant becomes also the “eternal covenant”, in contrast to the Mosaic covenant, which was temporary, and destined to “disappear” (Heb 8:13).

430 years: For a reconciliation with 400 years, see CGal 84.

Gal 3:19

THROUGH ANGELS: See Exo 3:2; 23:20; Isa 63:9; cp Heb 2:2-4.

BY A MEDIATOR: Moses: Heb 9:19,20. See Lesson, Mediatorship of Christ.

Gal 3:20

DOES NOT REPRESENT JUST ONE PARTY: Moses and the Law could not mediate the blessing by faith of the “one” seed (Gal 3:16).

GOD IS ONE: But since God is one, He must have one way of salvation, which, as just proved, was not the (exclusively Jewish) law!

Gal 3:21

Since God is one (v 20), there can be no real antagonism between Law and faith.

Gal 3:23

LOCKED UP: As the leper in Lev 13:5.

Gal 3:24

PUT IN CHARGE: “Paidogogus” = the “tutor-slave”, to discipline and educate young boys in the better households (CGal 90). But, with the passage of time, the pedagogue’s service necessarily comes to an end.

” ‘A child-custodian’ or ‘child-attendant.’ The pedagogue was a slave employed by wealthy Greeks or Romans to have responsibility for one of the children of the family. He had charge of the child from about the years six to sixteen and was responsible for watching over his behavior wherever he went and for conducting him to and from school. The pedagogue did not teach. Therefore the translation ‘schoolmaster’ [KJV] is wrong; if Paul had meant this, he would have used ‘didaskalos’ rather than ‘paidagogos’. Paul’s point is that this responsibility ceased when the child entered into the fullness of his position as a son, becoming an acknowledged adult by the formal rite of adoption by his father (see Gal 4:1-7). ‘To Christ’ is not to be taken in a geographic sense as though the pedagogue was conducting the child to a teacher, as some have implied. The reference, as in the preceding verse, is temporal; it means ‘until we come of age at the time of the revelation of our full sonship through Christ’s coming’ ” (EBC).

TO LEAD US TO CHRIST: “The Law served its usefulness as a schoolmaster [AV] to bring men to Christ, but as a law code it is no longer binding upon believers. This is not, however, to be confused with the many Messianic prophecies referring to the reign of Christ on the earth which still await fulfilment. The Christadelphian must establish the legitimacy of his frequent OT refs before the full import of their force registers. The inspired application of more than 630 OT refs cited and used by Christ and the Apostles in the NT is an authoritative guide to Biblical interpretation” (WS 78).

Gal 3:26

YOU ARE ALL SONS OF GOD: No higher relationship with God is possible than that of sonship: Joh 1:12; 1Pe 1:14; Rom 8:14,15.

Gal 3:28

In ct to traditional synagogue prayer: “Lord, I thank thee that thou didst make me not a Gentile, but a Jew; not a slave but free; not a woman but a man” (WEnj 158; CGal 92).

ALL ONE IN CHRIST: Joh 10:16; 17:11,20-23.

Galatians 2

Gal 2:2

WHO SEEMED TO BE LEADERS: Not the apostles, but “pseudo-apostles” (Gal 2:6,9; 6:3).

WAS RUNNING… HAD RUN: Heb idiom for prophet carrying a message: Jer 23:21; Eze 1:18,20; 1Ki 18:46; Psa 147:15; 2Ch 16:9; Hab 2:2; Amo 8:12; Zec 4:10; Dan 12:4.

Gal 2:4

FALSE BROTHERS: “Pseudadelphos”. Pharisaical infiltrators intent on turning Gentile believers into slaves to the Law of Moses.

Gal 2:6

See Deu 10:17 and context: God shows no partiality.

ADDED NOTHING TO MY MESSAGE: That is, they could not compel Paul to change anything or add anything to his teachings! Or… they did not excel Paul in qualifications or arguments.

Gal 2:9

PILLARS: Which, ironically, draw lines of demarcation in field of gospel proclamation (cp usage of pillars in Gen 31:35-52; Exo 14:19,20).

RIGHT HAND OF FELLOWSHIP: Sig status of equality as apostles.

Gal 2:10

ALL THEY ASKED WAS THAT WE SHOULD CONTINUE TO REMEMBER THE POOR: The apostles in Jerusalem encouraged Paul “to remember the poor”. This was not a general concern for all poor everywhere. It would appear that it was a concern for the “poor saints in Jerusalem” (Rom 15:26). Romans was written by Paul just before he arrived in Jerusalem with the money which he had been collecting for the poor brethren and sisters there. They were in particular need because: (1) on accepting the gospel they were put out of the synagogue and alienated from their fellow countrymen, and (2) some who were baptized in Jerusalem were from distant lands, and probably did not return home again — but instead stayed in the city with the new ecclesia, without employment.

“Why does God allow so many of His children to be poor? He could make them all rich if He pleased; He could lay bags of gold at their doors; He could send them a large annual income; or He could scatter round their houses abundance of provisions, as once he made the quails lie in heaps round the camp of Israel, and rained bread out of heaven to feed them. There is no necessity that they should be poor, except that He sees it to be best. ‘The cattle upon a thousand hills’ are His — He could supply them; He could make the richest, the greatest, and the mightiest bring all their power and riches to the feet of His children, for the hearts of all men are in His control. But He does not choose to do so; He allows them to suffer want… Why is this? There are many reasons: one is, to give us, who are favoured with enough, an opportunity of showing our love to Jesus. We show our love to Christ when we sing of him and when we pray to him; but if there were no sons of need in the world we should lose the sweet privilege of evidencing our love, by ministering to his poorer brethren; he has ordained that thus we should prove that our love standeth not in word only, but in deed and in truth. If we truly love Christ, we shall care for those who are loved by him. Those who are dear to him will be dear to us. Let us then look upon it not as a duty but as a privilege to relieve the poor of the Lord’s flock — remembering the words of the Lord Jesus, ‘Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.’ Surely this assurance is sweet enough, and this motive strong enough to lead us to help others with a willing hand and a loving heart — recollecting that all we do for his people is graciously accepted by Christ as done to himself” (CHS).

Gal 2:12

BEFORE CERTAIN MEN CAME FROM JAMES: But not necessarily with his knowledge, nor his approval (Acts 15:24).

…AND SEPARATE HIMSELF: A form of spiritual blackmail.

“There are certain people that most of us look up to as being leaders in the church. They are examples to us of Christian life in action, they are always there, dependable and knowledgeable. They are people we believe will never let us down and will always lead us in the right direction. To most of the people in the early church, the apostles were those kind of leaders. Peter, particularly, seems to have been a leader — and in the forefront of all that was happening and so his lead was followed by many of the other believers. But Peter, even though he was an esteemed apostle, was still just a man and still able to make mistakes. He was still just as able to bow to pressure as you or I. So when Peter did bow to pressure from forceful Jews he was joined by others who followed him and who were not so strong. Even Barnabas, who I would consider to have been a strong and godly man, was led astray by Peter’s mistakes.

“We need to make sure that we are followers of the Lord Jesus Christ — not followers of people we consider faithful. Jesus will never fail us, but even the strongest most faithful believer can lead us astray. Set your eyes on Jesus today” (RP).

Gal 2:13

“Perhaps it is something of a comfort in our own problems to know that for a time two great apostles were not in the same ‘fellowship’ ” (AE, Xd 108:60).

Gal 2:14

The “ultra-conservatives” from Jerusalem demanded that circumcision be made a “matter of fellowship” (AE, Xd 108:60).

Gal 2:15

‘GENTILE SINNERS’: A Judaistic phrase of contempt.

Gal 2:20

CRUCIFIED WITH CHRIST: This means three things: (1) a man on a cross is facing in only one direction; (2) he is not going back; and (3) he has no further plans of his own; he is through with the pomp and pride and vanity of this life. Its chains are broken and its charms are gone. Probably for the first time ever, he is truly “free” from everything that this world has to offer!

WHO LOVED ME AND GAVE HIMSELF FOR ME: In the most poignant personal expression Paul testifies to the moral force of the life and sacrifice of Christ when he writes that the Son of God “loved me and gave himself for me”. Nothing else can have the spiritual impact of this truth totally believed. Christ did not just die for ‘us’ as an anonymous group. The real, awe-inspiring wonder is that he died for us as a group of individuals, each of whom he loved personally. He died for each one of us. He died for ME! Had there been only one sinner, Christ would still have been willing to die. When each of us stands before the judgment seat he will be looking into the eyes of a man who surrendered his life, personally and individually, for him or her.

Gal 2:21

“This may be one of those verses that you casually glide by in reading, but it is a concept that has tremendous implications for the person who will but study its meaning.

“The initial implication for the verse is simple. The Judaizers, believers in Jesus who taught that salvation still came through following the Law of Moses, had put themselves in an untenable position. They had, in effect by their teaching, made Christ’s death on the cross meaningless. Paul states the logic as follows: (1) If salvation comes by the Law of Moses, and (2) we already have the Law of Moses, then (3) Jesus did not have to come into the world to save us, and thus (4) his death was meaningless. The Judaizers had made the Law of Moses the thing that needed to fill the ‘salvation gap’ — the gap between baptism and salvation in the Kingdom. In other words, it was fine to believe in Jesus and become baptized as taught by Jesus and the apostles. However, the Judaizers inserted a step between baptism and the kingdom that enabled salvation. Their stopgap was the Law.

“We readily see the logic and validity of the argument when we apply it to the Law of Moses, but do we see it when we apply it to other things? Do we see that we commit the same error when we take that verse and subtract ‘the law’ and put something in its place? For example, let’s take out ‘the law’ and put in ‘works’ and see if the logic still holds? ‘I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by works, then Christ is dead in vain.’ The logic again is irrefutable. Isn’t this the logic of Eph 2:8,9?: ‘For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast.’

“The fact is that everything — EVERYTHING — that can be done for us in the way of salvation… was done for us on the cross by Jesus Christ. We might be able to take ourselves out of the way of salvation by refusing to act on our ‘faith’, but we cannot do anything more to save ourselves than we did when we believed and were baptized into the saving name of Jesus. When we appear before the Judgment Seat of Christ, it is not to see if WE have saved ourselves, but to see if we have keep the precious gift of salvation that we were given in an appropriate manner… or have we buried our talent in the ‘earth’ of our flesh?

“All human-created fillers for the ‘salvation gap’ — works, Bible study, being nice to our neighbors, etc — as important as they may be, will not save us because that work has already been finished. When we do those things (and rest assured we MUST do those things), it is not to save ourselves, but because we have been saved. These acts of faith must be done or we do not possess the faith that saved us in the first place.

“We fear this position because it hurts our human pride. We have nothing to brag about (which is the point in the first place). We also fear, like Paul’s Judaizing opponents are quoted as saying, ‘Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?’ This too is a complete misapplication of Scripture. Having our names written in the Book of Life is not about license to sin, but about understanding the process of salvation. The last thing we want to do is be guilty of teaching that ‘Christ is dead in vain’ ” (KT).

Galatians Overview

Author: Paul

Time: AD 49

Summary: The letter to the believers in Galatia focuses on the divisions that Jewish Christians were causing among new Gentile converts. These “Judaizers” were trying to convince the Gentiles that they needed to be circumcised and to keep the ritual law in order to be saved. Paul argues that both Jew and Gentile alike enjoy in Christ complete salvation. Reliance on the Law was only a bondage to death and could not produce life-giving freedom, as only Christ could grant that freedom. Paul was showing that all legalistic variations of the Gospel are perversions of it and should be shown as such.

Key verse: “We, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by observing the law, because by observing the law no one will be justified” (Gal 2:16).

Outline

1. Introduction: Gal 1:1-9

a) Greetings: Gal 1:1-5 b) Purpose of letter: Gal 1:6-9

2. Paul’s defense of his apostleship: Gal 1:10 – 2:14

a) Paul called by God: Gal 1:10-24 b) Paul accepted by apostles: Gal 2:1-10 c) Paul opposes Peter at Antioch: Gal 2:11-14

3. Salvation by faith not law: Gal 2:15 – 4:31

a) Justified by faith in Christ: Gal 2:15-21 b) The Galatians’ experience at conversion: Gal 3:1-5 c) Experience of Abraham: Gal 3:6-9 d) Curse of the law: Gal 3:10-14 e) Promises before the law: Gal 3:15-18 f) Purpose of the law: Gal 3:19-25 g) Sons not slaves: Gal 3:26 – 4:11 h) Personal appeal: Gal 4:12-20 i) Allegory of Hagar and Sarah: Gal 4:21-31

4. The life of liberty and faith: Gal 5:1 – 6:10

a) Exhortation to freedom: Gal 5:1-12 b) Liberty is not license: Gal 5:13-15 b) Life by the Spirit, not by the flesh: Gal 5:13-26 c) Doing good to all: Gal 6:1-10

5. Conclusion: Gal 6:11-18

2 Corinthians 6

2Co 6:1

NOT TO RECEIVE GOD’S GRACE IN VAIN: “If our appreciation of the Gospel rises no higher than the comfort of being saved, we receive the grace of God in vain. Our heart must be filled with an appreciation of the greatness, and goodness, and worthiness, and unspeakable excellence of Him by whom all things have been made. The first feature of a true son is that he knows, loves, and glories in his father. The love of his father’s property would not be accepted as an equivalent for personal love. Our love of eternal life and the kingdom of God will not stand instead of the ‘loving of the Lord our God with all our hearts’, which is ‘the first and great commandment’ ” (SC).

2Co 6:2

Citing Isa 49:8 (where in context Christ is a light to the Gentiles!): God’s help and assistance — given to the suffering Servant — are still available to the multitudinous servant.

NOW IS THE DAY OF SALVATION: “Take just one day at a time, and enjoy it to the very limit. When you get up in the morning, make up your mind you are going to enjoy the day to the fullest — every moment of it: not a moment wasted in non-enjoyment, just as if it were the only day you ever had or ever will have. Determine that it will be the only day of your life: in joy and in service. Do not confuse enjoyment with entertainment. Entertainment — self-pleasing, selfish ‘pleasure’ — is but pitiful dancing on the deck of the Titanic: stupidity: wicked, criminal waste of precious time that could profitably be devoted to true enjoyment. Enjoyment is keeping God — goodness, love, holiness, wisdom, power — continually before the mind’s eye: and doing — at every moment — the best thing to be done at that moment, to the very best of the ability: every effort: nothing held back: all the care, all the attention. Sometimes the ‘best’ thing for the present moment is a most common and mundane thing, like shining shoes or taking out the garbage. But if it is a necessary part of a life totally devoted to God, then it is done unto God, just as much as is the highest and noblest activity possible, and thereby it is glorified, gilded with eternal beauty and meaning. That is true living. All else is death, in various degrees and percentages” (GVG).

2Co 6:4

Vv 4,5: 7-fold passive sufferings.

2Co 6:5

Vv 5,6: 7-fold active self-denial (beginning with “hard work”).

2Co 6:6

Vv 6-8: 7-fold means to endure labor (beginning with by A holy spirit”).

SINCERE: Gr “anupokritos” = lit, without hypocrisy. Used Rom 12:9; 2Co 6:6; 1Ti 1:5; 2Ti 1:5; Jam 3:17; 1Pe 1:22.

2Co 6:8

Vv 8-10: 7-fold result, a series of contrasts (beginning with “genuine…”).

2Co 6:14

DO NOT BE YOKED TOGETHER WITH UNBELIEVERS: Unequal yoking — the principle: What God has joined, we must not separate. What God has separated, we must not join. Unequal yoking is (a) unfitting — because of differences in size, temperament, strength. The ox is clean, and the ass unclean (Deu 22:10). Unequal yoking is (b) unfair — because both would suffer pain, discomfort. Thus unequal yoking leads to a poor working combination.

Marriage with unbelievers causes many problems: Gen 27:46; Deu 7:1-4; Exo 34:14-16; 1Ki 11:1-4; 1Co 7:39; 2Co 6:14-17. See Lesson, Marriage “only in the Lord”.

Vv 14-17: See Lesson, Come out from them (2Co 6).

2Co 6:18

“Our Father in heaven” (Mat 6:9); “Father of glory” or “glorious Father” (Eph 1:17); “Father of compassion” (2Co 1:3); “Father of spirits” (Heb 12:9); “Father of the heavenly lights” (Jam 1:17); “a Father to you” (2Co 6:18); “the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ” (Rom 15:6).

2 Corinthians 4

2Co 4:1

The ministry of preaching the gospel came through God’s mercy.

2Co 4:2

Vv 2-4: In an allusion similar to Rom 16:17-20, Paul refers to those “believers” who trusted in the law of Moses. They had not “renounced the hidden things of dishonesty”. They were still “walking in craftiness” and “handling the word of God deceitfully ” — thus living up (or down!) to the example of their spiritual “ancestor” — the old serpent!

Continuing his analogy, Paul evidently has in mind again the tragic history of Eden lost. In seeking to be like the Elohim, Eve departed from her “first estate”. She was reaching for “greater light”. She found instead darkness — deceived by the serpent, or the “god of this world”. Her mind was blinded by “the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life” (1Jo 2:15,16), and consequently she “believed not” God. Thus was the creation plunged down to ruin.

But God’s ultimate purpose with the earth would not be thwarted by a pair of sinners. The God who commanded light to shine out of darkness at the first creation (2Co 4:6; Gen 1:3), set about immediately with a plan to reclaim His fallen creation. This plan called for another “light” to shine into the world, that is, a new “Adam” made in the express image of his Father (Heb 1:3). In all the things wherein the first “Adam” and his wife failed, the last “Adam” would succeed. He would renounce the hidden works of darkness; he would handle God’s word aright; he would reject the evil and choose the good. He would show forth the full knowledge of the glory of God, which had since Eden been clouded and dim. And through his work, he would redeem his “bride”, from the serpent’s folly.

DECEPTION: Allusion to serpent in Eden (see context).

DISTORT THE WORD OF GOD: As serpent in Gen 3:1,4.

2Co 4:4

GOD OF THIS AGE: Materialism, pleasure?

HAS BLINDED THE MINDS OF UNBELIEVERS…: An “idol” is something men “worship”… which “blinds” their minds, “preventing” the gospel and the love of God from entering, or controlling, their lives.

If we get this point right, it seems to me, then we may recognize that anything and everything, essentially, MAY BE an idol… but nothing, effectively, MUST BE an idol. Let me illustrate what I mean:

Even the most innocuous of pastimes: gardening or long walks on the beach — MAY BE “idols” if pursued and enjoyed to the exclusion of the worship and service of our Heavenly Father. But, of course, they are not necessarily “idols”!

For that matter, the very most legitimate time-consumers — such as family and work — MAY BE “idols” IF our interests and concerns in these directions, and our allotments of time and energy, threaten to crowd out God from our lives. After all, Jesus said, “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters — yes, even his own life — he cannot be my disciple” (Luk 14:26). Harsh language indeed, since elsewhere we are plainly told to love our spouses and families, to provide for them, to honor our parents, etc, etc. Surely Jesus is saying, ‘Don’t let EVEN your family… those closest to you… who have the most legitimate claims upon you… don’t even let them turn you aside from serving God!’ Likewise, work — earning one’s daily bread, and providing for one’s family — is the most legitimate of pursuits (supported by various Bible passages), but if through greed (the love of money) or competitiveness (pride) our jobs become the be-all and end-all of our lives, and threaten to consume all our time and all our concern, and to squeeze God out of our lives, then the Bible tells us they are “idols”!

On the other hand, and looking at what might be called the other end of the continuum, we consider the graven images which depicted or represented false gods. Surely, we say, such images were and are ALWAYS “idols”. No question there. Aren’t they, invariably, “idols”? I am not so sure. Remember the brazen serpent of Moses, which Hezekiah later threw on the scrap heap, calling it — contemptuously, I think — “Nehushtan”, a mere piece of brass! Was it an idol, or was it merely a piece of metal? I think the answer depended on how any individual viewed it. To Moses and those who were saved by looking to it, it was surely not an idol — but a reminder of God’s love and even a prophetic indicator of the Messiah who was to come — who would be lifted up on behalf of all men (John 3:13-16). But to the superstitiously-inclined of generations after Moses, it began to be thought of in an idolatrous manner: its veneration threatened to crowd out God Himself, and for that reason it ought to be destroyed.

Similar points might be made about the symbol of the cross: an object whose meaning changed for people (at least, some people) over time.

Likewise, Paul in Romans and 1 Corinthians deals with the question of meat offered to idols, real idols of wood or stone or metal, by pointing out — essentially — that every person’s conscience might be different in regard to the “realness” of such “idols”. He says (I’m paraphrasing) that we know (or should know) that such objects are not gods at all; in other words, such a “god” is, really, “no god” — it’s just a lifeless material thing, with no mystical powers, and no evil connotations… unless we endow it with such powers! But for those who cannot help themselves, but view such an image as truly an idol, or have felt or seen its “power” in their lives or the lives of others, then… yes, it’s a “god” or an “idol”… and such scruples ought to be respected by other, “stronger” brethren.

So, it seems that even what we might at first glance agree is, very definitely, an “idol”… may NOT be an “idol” either — unless we make it so!

I subscribe to BAR magazine (Biblical Archaeology Review). A few years ago, BAR ran ads for replicas of certain “gods” and “goddesses” — little images of various statues and images that had been unearthed by archaeologists in and around the Holy Land, accompanied by descriptions and explanations of their Biblical significance. It was quite interesting to see the sorts of reactions these ads produced: some folks were vehemently angry because BAR was promoting “idolatry”; there were cancellations of subscriptions, and charges of idolatry and blasphemy if even a picture of such images were printed in the magazine.

Were such little images truly “idols”? Or not?

2Co 4:5

WE DO NOT PREACH OURSELVES: Paul’s response to those who had been questioning his apostleship. This charge is replaced with an exposition of how the glory of God can be seen in Jesus — and consequently in us if we are followers of Jesus rather than followers of Paul or Apollos, etc.

2Co 4:6

See Gen 1:4; Mal 4:2. The light has been there right from the first day of creation. Jesus is described as the light too, in the context of beginnings in John 1:7-10. This light, we are now told, must shine in our hearts. Eph 5:8; 2Pe 1:19; 2Co 3:18.

“Thou Whose Almighty word Chaos and darkness heard, And took their flight: Hear us, we humbly pray, And where the Gospel day Sheds not its glorious ray, Let there be light.”

FACE OF CHRIST: Ct face of Moses, veiled (2Co 3:13). “Jesus casts no shadows” (MP 5).

2Co 4:7

JARS OF CLAY: “Earthen vessels” (AV). In recent times precious scrolls have been found preserved in earthen jars (Dawn 42:49). Jeremiah commanded Baruch to take legal evidences of a purchase and put them in an earthen vessel, “that they may continue many days” (Jer 32:14). Archaeology has shown that if vessels containing valuables are stored in a safe place, both the vessels and their contents will be saved from the ravages of time and weather. The urns and vases of antiquity testify to the durability of potter’s clay!

We have a “treasure” within ourselves to share to others, so that they may know of the glory of God. God knows we are but earthen vessels, be He has chosen us to carry His name. So with confidence we can let His light shine forth. He will manifest His will through us if we use the gifts He has given us in whatever small way to show His loving and merciful plan to others. We do not need to fear our inadequacy for the Father knows the vessel He has created. He knows our strengths and our limitations. We need to acknowledge the strength He has provided to us, and use that in service to him, so that His light may surely shine through our works. Then may His glory abound even more.

2Co 4:8

HARD PRESSED ON EVERY SIDE: Historian Shelby Foote tells of a soldier who was wounded at the battle of Shiloh during the Civil War and was ordered to go to the rear. The fighting was fierce and within minutes he returned to his commanding officer. “Captain, give me a gun!” he shouted. “This fight ain’t got any rear!”

2Co 4:14

See VL, Christ’s resurrection, reality.

2Co 4:17

OUR LIGHT AND MOMENTARY TROUBLES: “The discipline of human parents partakes of the limitations of human nature; it is exercised as ‘seemed good to them’, and with the best of intentions it is not always wisely applied. But God’s training has none of the deficiencies of the human training: it is directed with unerring wisdom for the benefit of the subjects of it. God’s aim is that His children might be partakers of His holiness. When the end is reached and the bodies of His sons are made ‘glorious’, and when those children exhibit divine holiness in every word and act, it will be seen that the present trial is but a light affliction compared to the eternal weight of glory then enjoyed” (CHeb 260,261).

MOMENTARY: “The whole history of mankind does not constitute a fraction of eternity. The realisation of this fact helps us to see something of God’s point of view, and we can understand why that which seems like the most awful suffering to us can be described as a ‘light affliction which endureth but for a moment’ ” (IC).

LIGHT… OUTWEIGHS…: Both these words make a word play on the HEBREW (not the Greek) word for “glory”, which is “kabod”, literally “weight”!

2Co 4:18

WHAT IS SEEN IS TEMPORARY: “There can be no comparison between a temporal and an eternal object, since the finite can never be compared with the infinite. It is a fact, however, that in all temporal objects men pay great regard to the time required for the endeavour and the durability of the finished work. Who would not be willing to endure a single second of suffering in order to secure some substantial advantage for the rest of life? Yet even a second is a proportion of our allotted span. The fraction can easily be expressed in figures, and not such an appalling array of figures either. Sixty seconds to the minute, sixty minutes to the hour, twenty-four hours to the day, 365 days to the year, and then seventy years for a human life. But the whole history of mankind does not constitute a fraction of eternity. The realization of this fact helps us to see something of God’s point of view, and we can understand why that which seems like the most awful suffering to us can be described as a ‘light affliction which endureth but for a moment’ [2Co 4:17]” (ConCon 125,126).

WHAT IS UNSEEN IS ETERNAL: “Get out of this world into God’s world. Take everything worthwhile with you, and get rid of all the rest. Don’t have any ties or possessions here: they divide the interest, and dilute the attention. God’s world is the real, eternal world. This world is a passing, meaningless, animal world. There is nothing about it real, lasting, or satisfying. It’s made up merely of dull, repetitious games, which grow increasingly boring as we grow older: travel games, getting-things games, seeing-things games, beating-a-little-ball games, pride games, dressing-up games, collecting-things games, ‘nice’ home games, ‘nice’ car games. What a weariness at last! God’s world is an increasingly interesting and satisfying world. It has to do with working toward perfection and permanence, beauty and joy that does not fade. God’s world is ever brighter, ever stronger. This world is a gradual running down and wearing out until at last it is a cold and endless night. See it as it really is — and leave it all behind” (GVG).

WHAT IS UNSEEN IS ETERNAL: “A real Christian is an odd number anyway. He feels supreme love for one whom he has never seen; talks familiarly every day to someone he cannot see; expects to gain eternal life because of the virtue of someone else; empties himself in order to be full; admits he is wrong so he can be declared right; goes down in order to get up; is strongest when he is weakest; richest when he is poorest; and happiest when he feels the worst. He dies so he can live; forsakes in order to have; gives away so he can keep; sees the invisible, hears the inaudible, and knows that which passes knowledge. The man who has met God is not looking for anything; he has found it. He is not searching for light, for upon him the light has already shined. His certainty may seem bigoted, but his assurance is that of one who knows by experience his religion is not hearsay. He is not a copy, not a facsimile. He is an original from the hand of the Holy Spirit” (AWT).

“The spiritual is real. If we would rise into that region of light and power plainly beckoning us through the Scriptures of truth we must break the evil habit of ignoring the spiritual. We must shift our interest from the seen to the unseen. For the great unseen Reality is God. ‘He that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him’ (Heb 11:6). This is basic in the life of faith. From there we can rise to unlimited heights. ‘Ye believe in God,’ said our Lord Jesus Christ, ‘believe also in me’ (Joh 14:1). Without the first there can be no second. If we truly want to follow God we must seek to be other-worldly. This I say knowing well that that word has been used with scorn by the sons of this world and applied to the Christian as a badge of reproach. So be it. Every man must choose his world. If we who follow Christ, with all the facts before us and knowing what we are about, deliberately choose the Kingdom of God as our sphere of interest I see no reason why anyone should object. If we lose by it, the loss is our own; if we gain we rob no one by so doing” (AWT).

2 Corinthians 5

2Co 5:1

NOT BUILT BY HUMAN HANDS: Cp ideas, Dan 2:34,45; 8:25; Mark 14:58; Col 2:11; Heb 9:11. On the other hand, the idea of being “made with human hands” is demonstrated in Mark 14:58; Acts 7:48; 17:24; 19:26; Heb 9:11,24.

2Co 5:2

GROAN: Cp Rom 8:23.

HEAVENLY DWELLING: “House which is from (Gr “ek”, out of) heaven” (KJV). Cp “our life hid with Christ” in Col 3:3,4; Phi 3:21; 2Ti 4:8; 1Pe 1:4,5.

2Co 5:3

Vv 3,4: The ideas of “nakedness” and “clothing” seem to be borrowed from the garden of Eden: where the clothing, or “covering”, is an atoning sacrifice for the sins of our first parents.

NAKED: An intermediate state of dissolution between one “house” and another: ie death.

2Co 5:4

2Co 5:4.

TENT: Or “tabernacle” (KJV), a temporary, transient dwelling, sig the mortal state (cp Jam 4:14; Job 7:5,6; 14:1,2).

CLOTHED: A putting on of immortality: cp 1Co 15:53,54.

WITH OUR HEAVENLY DWELLING: These words have no counterpart in the Greek mss — an interpolation of the NIV translators!

2Co 5:6

Vv 6-9: The antithesis presented by these two words comes three times in 2Co 5:6,8,9; and these are the only occurrences. The key to the situation lies in recognizing that here, as in 1Co 12 (often) and 1Co 10:16,17 and Eph 1:23; 2:16; 4:4,12,16; 5:23,30 and Col 1:18; 2:17,19; 3:15, “body” signifies “the body of Christ, the ecclesia”. There is here an indication of the tension which must often have existed in the mind of Paul, and which is not unknown in the experience of men a good deal smaller than Paul — the desire to go into retirement and seclusion in order the better to enjoy the spiritual stimulus and satisfaction which Bible study and the Truth in Christ can impart. In Paul’s case, it could mean more than this — the enjoyment of personal (not mystical) fellowship with Christ through the “visions and revelations of the Lord” which at times he was privileged to experience. But as long as Paul was busy and active in the ecclesias (“at home in the Body”), such blessings were necessarily cut to a minimum. At such times esp Paul walked by faith, and not by sight (2Co 5:7). The apostle’s own much stronger inclination was the other way — to be “absent from the Body” (in retirement from his heavy ecclesial responsibilities), and so free to be “at home (in a very real personal fashion) with the Lord”. However, Paul accepted life as it came. He was content for Christ to decide how his life and activities should be spent. Accordingly, he made it his ambition, “whether present or absent”, for his life to be such that in the Last Day he would be “well-pleasing unto him”.

2Co 5:8

AWAY FROM THE BODY: That is, away from the natural body, and having been rewarded with a spiritual, or immortal, body — as at the judgment (v 10).

2Co 5:10

WHILE IN THE BODY: Perhaps “in and for the Body of Christ”… not just in one’s own body! Lit, “in order that each one may receive the through-the-Body things according to (?) what he did whether good or bad.”

2Co 5:11

MEN: Including alien Gentiles (Act 14:15).

2Co 5:14

See 1Co 15:29: we show forth Christ’s death — as Paul did — by dying daily (2Co 6:5-10). Cp Rom 14:8.

See Article, Constraining love.

2Co 5:16

FROM A WORLDLY POINT OF VIEW: “After the flesh” (AV). Did Paul know Jesus during his days of mortality? Cp 1Co 9:1,2. See CGal 18.

2Co 5:17

IN CHRIST: Only through baptism (Rom 6:3; Gal 3:27,28).

NEW CREATION: Moral regeneration: Tit 3:5; Eph 4:24. Not a new nature, but new thoughts and feelings and actions: cp Psa 51:10; 2Co 4:6; Rom 7:22; Col 3:10. See “new things”: Psa 40:17.

2Co 5:18

ALL THIS IS FROM GOD: God is the prime mover in our salvation, working through His special Son. It is God’s redemptive plan: not for our merits, but for His purpose to manifest Himself in a host of redeemed ones. He and His beloved Son did it together, in order to declare God’s righteousness: My Father is right! His way of the cross is right!

2Co 5:19

GOD WAS RECONCILING THE WORLD TO HIMSELF IN CHRIST: There was no difference between the motives of the One and the motives of the other; they were together. The old man Abraham and his son Isaac, who “went together” to the altar on Moriah (Gen 22:6,8), are the express pattern of the Heavenly Father and His Son who, together, go to the cross! (Notice how Paul in Rom 8:31,32 quotes Gen 22:12; and how, incidentally, Abraham — a man — actually typifies the Almighty!)

2Co 5:20

AMBASSADORS: Paul considered himself Christ’s ambassador — an authorized representative of a sovereign. He speaks not in his own name but on behalf of the ruler whose deputy he is, and his whole duty and responsibility is to interpret that ruler’s mind faithfully to those to whom he is sent. Paul used this “ambassador” image twice — both in connection with his preaching work (Eph 6:18-20; 2Co 5:18-20). Paul called himself an ambassador because he knew that, when he proclaimed the gospel facts and promises and urged sinners to receive the reconciliation God provided through His Son, he was declaring Christ’s message to the world. The figure of ambassadorship highlights the authority Paul had, as representing his Lord, so long as he remained faithful to the terms of his commission and said neither less nor more than he had been given to say.

2Co 5:21

“For he [God] hath made him [Christ] to be sin for us, who [Christ] knew no sin; so that we might be made the righteousness of God in him [Christ].”

There seems to be an implied ellipsis, balancing off the two clauses, along these lines:

“God made Christ, who knew no sin, to be sin for us, so that… we, [ellipsis: who know no righteousness], might be made righteousness in God.”

What does this mean?

‘God made Christ, who knew no sin (as an individual, by his own actions),

to be “sin” (through his corporate head, ie Adam — metonymy: cause for effect; undeserved, in group: cp Gal 4:4; Rom 8:3; Heb 2:14,15) for us… so that… we, [ellipsis] who knew no righteousness (as individuals, by our own actions), might be made the “righteousness of God” (through our corporate head, ie Christ — metonymy: cause for effect; undeserved, in group)!’

This may be seen also be reorganizing the clauses, along these lines:

Christ had nothing to do with sin by his own actions, even as we have nothing to do with righteousness by our own actions. But God made Christ to be identified with our “sin” (the nature we possess), as part of all mankind, though it was “undeserved”… so that we might be identified with his “righteousness” (by being “in him”), as part of Christ’s “body”, though we don’t deserve such “righteousness”.

“Sin, I say, is a synonym for human nature. Hence, the flesh is invariably regarded as unclean. It is therefore written, ‘How can he be clean who is born of a woman?’ (Job 25:4) ‘Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? Not one’ (Job 14:4). ‘What is man that he should be clean? And he which is born of a woman that he should be righteous? Behold, God putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight. How much more abominable and filthy is man, who drinketh iniquity like water?’ (Job 15:14-16) This view of sin in the flesh is enlightening in the things concerning Jesus. The apostle says, ‘God made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin’ (2Co 5:21); and this he explains in another place by saying, that ‘He sent his own son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh’ (Rom 8:3) in the offering of his body once (Heb 10:10,12,14). Sin could not have been condemned in the body of Jesus, if it had not existed there. His body was as unclean as the bodies of those for whom he died; for he was born of a woman, and ‘not one’ can bring a clean body out of a defiled body; for ‘that’, says Jesus himself, ‘which is born of the flesh is flesh’ (Joh 3:6)” (Elp ch 4).

“Jesus was ‘made sin for us’. Besides being grammatically impossible [SCx thinks this is somewhat overstated, and would prefer: “very, very unlikely”], we must reject as futile… the suggestion that by ‘sin’ Paul in this place means ‘sin-offering’. No, Paul means sin, but we must understand what is intended by the word. Christ was made sin in partaking of the nature in which sin reigns and which produces sin, and which therefore by metonymy is called sin. We may go further and say he was made ‘sin’ in enduring the consequences of sin — sin not his own, for he did not sin — but sin which has left its effects upon the whole race of mankind in bringing all under subjection to death. If we recognize how horrible in God’s sight sin is, then we see how the effects of it are brought to a focus as it were in His own obedient Son” (CGal 75). Elsewhere, however, Christ is spoken of as an “offering for sin” (ie Isa 53:10).

“Is it likely then that Paul when writing to them [the Corinthians] would have used a Hebraism that had been avoided even in the LXX? Also, if Paul meant ‘an offering’ why not say ‘made a prosphora (Gr: offering) for us’? He did in Eph 5:2, so why not here?” (SCx).

The Greek here is “hamartias”, NOT “peri hamartias” (lit, “FOR sin”, which would be the common LXX translation of “sin-OFFERING”) (see “What is the ‘sin’ of 2Co 5:12?” in “Questions about the Atonement”).

“Augustine (Sermons 134, 155) and others expound ‘sin’ to be ‘sin-offering.’ This use of the word is found in the Hebrew text of Lev 6:25: ‘this is the law of the sin… the sin shall be slaughtered before Jehovah”: Lev 6:30, ‘every sin whose blood shall be brought, etc.’ But it is not found in the LXX or in the NT; is in no way suggested here; and is forbidden by the contrast of ‘sin’ and ‘righteousness.’ Rather, the sacrificial use of the word is explained by, and is an anticipation of, this verse. The sacrificed animals were embodiments of sin” (JAB).

“Not a sin offering, which would destroy the antithesis to ‘righteousness,’ and would make ‘sin’ be used in different senses in the same sentence: not a sinful person, which would be untrue, and would require in the antithesis ‘righteous men’, not ‘righteousness’; but ‘sin’, that is, the representative Sin-bearer (vicariously) of the aggregate sin of all men past, present, and future. The sin of the world is one, therefore the singular, not the plural, is used; though its manifestations are manifold (Joh 1:29). ‘Behold the Lamb of God, that taketh away the SIN of the world.’ Cp ‘made a curse for us’, Gal 3:13” (JFB).

“He made to be sin (‘amartian epoihsen’). The words ‘to be’ are not in the Greek. ‘Sin’ here is the substantive, not the verb. God ‘treated as sin’ the one ‘who knew no sin’ But he knew the contradiction of sinners (Heb 12:3). We may not dare to probe too far into the mystery of Christ’s suffering on the Cross, but this fact throws some light on the tragic cry of Jesus just before he died: ‘My God, My God, why didst thou forsake me?’ (Mat 27:46)” (RWP).

1 Corinthians 14

1Co 14:2

TONGUE: “Glossa”, used interchangably with “dialectos” in Act 2:4,8. Ref foreign language in Rev 5:9; 7:9; 10:11; 11:9; 13:7; 14:6; 17:15. “Glossa” sig intelligible speech in Rom 14:11; Phi 2:11; 1Jo 3:18.

1Co 14:5

Moses: “Would God that all the LORD’s people were prophets…” (Num 11:29). In Corinth the brethren were concerned with tongues (1Co 13) — presumably for self gratification. Hence Paul discusses the merits and demerits of tongues and interpreters and edification.

THAT THE CHURCH MAY BE EDIFIED: Notice the way “edification” is stressed throughout: 1Co 8:1; 10:23; 14:3-5,12,17.26. Tongues, without an interpreter, did not edify; but prophecy did. Here, prophecy extends beyond speaking about the future; it encompasses exposition of the Scripture also — encompassing exhortations and Bible classes.

1Co 14:8

TRUMPET: There were special differences between different trumpet sounds (Num 10:9).

1Co 14:14

Even the brother praying or speaking in another tongue did not necessarily understand his own words (WFB 127). Or, alternatively, Paul does not mean that he himself cannot understand his meaning. Rather, to paraphrase, “If I pray in another tongue, my understanding does no good for my listeners, unless they understand too.”

1Co 14:16

THANKSGIVING: Eucharistos = the breaking of bread. There, esp, the ecclesia was to “proclaim” Christ (1Co 11:26; Rom 3:5), so that visitors might understand.

1Co 14:20

“God’s professed people — presumed heirs and rulers of the world to come — wasting their precious time and attention on the world’s baby-toys is like a pitiful lunatic millionaire picking through the garbage, mentally incapable of comprehending or enjoying his vast riches” (GVG).

1Co 14:34

See RR in Ber 69:9. Cp Hab 2:20.

1Co 14:40

IN A FITTING AND ORDERLY WAY: “The brother or sister who sincerely loves God will endeavour always to be punctual in the observance of His requirements and appointments. (Unavoidable lateness is exceptional, and need not here be considered.) To be late at the meetings when we could have been early is indicative of indifference and carelessness in regard to the things of God. The meetings are of God’s appointment for the benefit of His children. The latecomer not only himself loses much of this benefit, but hinders those who are punctual in receiving the good. Usually the meetings commence with collective thanksgiving to God; is it not manifestly irreverent, and consequently displeasing to Him, that the privilege should be disturbed by latecomers, who with a little thought and care could have been present to unite in prayer and thanksgiving? Christ is our example in all things, and there is more than a suggestion of punctuality in the record that ‘when the hour was come he sat down, and the twelve apostles with him’ (to eat the Passover) (Luk 22:14)” (WJW).

“How necessary it is, even where faith exists, to add to it courage! A faith without courage can never overcome the world, and they who fail in this conflict can have no part in the Kingdom of God.

“The doctrine Paul taught, and the customs he established, afforded no scope for the gratification of personal ambition and democratic turbulence. He required that all things should be done decently and in order: and to the edification, or the building up, of the body of Christ in its most holy faith. All this was very displeasing to men of vain and conceited minds, whose propensity was for talk and egotistical display” (JT).

Setting “in order” is a significant thing in the service of God (particularly in the area of offering sacrifices): Gen 22:9; Exo 26:17; 39:37; 40:4,23; Lev 1:7,8,12; 6:12; 24:8; 1Ki 18:33; 2Ki 20:1; 2Ch 13:11; 29:35; Eze 41:6; Acts 18:23; 1Co 11:34; 14:40; Tit 1:5.