Honesty

“Being honest in the sight of all men means that we must be completely straightforward and truthful in our dealings with others — and also to ourselves. We say we have accepted the Truth and claim therefore that we are honest. But do we continue to make mischief and tell lies?

“Sometimes we find it hard to be honest because we don’t want to upset anyone. To take a very trivial example: we see a friend and we don’t think that her clothing is at all appropriate but we are afraid to say so and end up complimenting her. Is that being honest? In speaking the truth we have to be gentle and considerate, but sometimes even that can bring hurt feelings.

“We are supposed to be missionaries preaching the Lord Jesus Christ in word and action. He was always totally honest and true — as we must be! He was not only honest in the sight of all men, he was totally honest before God. And he will help us in our aim to be honest before God, for only then will our honesty be complete. Look how he helped Peter to overcome his shameful dishonesty. And he did it in deepest love.

“Sometimes we tell lies and excuse them as jokes when they are found out. ‘Like a madman shooting firebrands or deadly arrows is a man who deceives his neighbour and says, “I was only joking!” ‘ (Pro 26:18,19). This kind of behaviour is often seen in children and because it is not corrected it continues into manhood. It is never too early to learn that complete truthfulness must be a way of life from childhood onward. These things the Lord hates — a proud look, a lying tongue, a false witness who tells lies, and he that sows discord among brethren.

“We must be on our guard that we are not taken in by lies just because we hear them over and over again. We must also make sure that we ourselves are not guilty of trying to convince others of something that is not true by the use of repetition. Remember that mob in the theatre in Ephesus? They wanted everybody to believe that the goddess Diana was real. So they just shouted and screamed and chanted in unison, ‘Great is Diana of the Ephesians’ for a couple of hours until everybody was hoarse. But the idol was as dead at the end of all those ‘vain repetitions’ as it was at the beginning. Let us not be so proud as to refuse to give up a false opinion we have, even though the truth has been revealed to us.

“Recently I spoke to a sister concerning a brother and family member about some misunderstanding that had taken place. The sister made it clear that there was nothing I nor anyone could do to convince this brother that what he heard was a lie. He is stubborn and too proud to let go of self and be humble. We deplore this behaviour in others. Let us also be sure that we despise it in ourselves as well.

“In Psa 133, we are reminded that it is good and pleasant for brethren to dwell together in unity. The final blessing of eternal life will come only to brethren and sisters who dwell together in unity. Spreading lies and believing them causes discord and unhappiness. What a hateful thing to sow seeds of bitterness in a united family and cause unnecessary strife! This is the old nature of man, but for those who are washed in the blood of the Lamb, this should not be named among us. Our faith should be stronger than to tell lies.

“The Internet and E-mail have provided a new medium for spreading lies about those whom we may not like. We can hide our identity while still causing pain to others. I have been appalled at the misuse of the Internet by brethren who should know better. I know one sister who has suffered intense distress because of untrue things circulated widely about her, in some cases by brethren who have never even met her. It should never be like that in the family of God.

“Why should anyone — especially a brother or a sister — tell such lies deliberately? Is it to accomplish evil? Why go naked to such a work when there are many beautiful garments ready to hand? It is easy to feel bitter and find covering which might even deceive ourselves.

“We have much to be thankful for today through the mercies of God shown in the saving name of Christ Jesus. That’s why many of us who have lying lips like Ananias and Sapphira don’t drop down dead immediately as they did. There is still time to start a life of truthfulness. How long are we going to wait before we…

“Speak the truth and speak it ever, cost it what it will. He who hides the wrong he did, does the wrong thing still.

“Brethren and sisters, we cannot lie our way through to the Kingdom. Instead, be honest and true. Be truly serious about the word. Be true to one another” (Gerzel Gordon).

Hope deferred (Pro 13:12)

HOPE DEFERRED… DESIRE FULFILLED

“Hope deferred makes the heart sick, but a desire fulfilled is a tree of life” (Pro 13:12, RSV).

How many of us have experienced the first part of this verse? Maybe it was a job that you really, really wanted, and you had to wait and wait, and finally, it went to someone else. Or maybe it was a deep feeling for someone, and you thought, “I could be so happy with that person because that person displays every quality I want in a mate.” And yet, for whatever reason, it just doesn’t happen.

Or perhaps, it was the hope for a baby. Husband and wife enjoyed a good marriage; they were in love with one another; yet after months or maybe years of trying, no pregnancy. And the body absolutely ached with this unfulfilled desire.

Sometimes, what starts out in the mind as a hope deferred, after a while, takes on a life of its own. The hurt literally spreads to the rest of the body, and seems to consume the person — until finally he or she cannot function at any level.

There are examples in the Bible of these sorts of feelings. These longings reflect part of the character-building process used by God. Two familiar stories serve as test cases.

Abraham, Sarah, and the seed

At the age of 75 Abraham was told by God that he would have a son who would do amazing things — he would bring salvation to all who had faith in him. Yet Sarah — 66 at the time of the initial promise — was barren. So, month after month, year after year, Abraham grew more despondent. Nothing was happening. Finally, Abraham asked God if Eliezer of Damascus, his steward, might be the promised “seed”. But God said no. Yet it is recorded that “Abraham believed, and God reckoned it to him as righteousness” (Gen 15:6).

And still there was no seed; Sarah remained barren; time marched on. Sarah was obviously frustrated with this situation; at last, she decided to take matters into her own hands: she gave her maid Hagar to Abraham. He complied with her wishes, and Hagar became pregnant. She bore Ishmael to Abraham when he was 86.

Now at last, Abraham had the promised seed, right? But thirteen more years came and went with, as far as we know, no open revelations from God. The question must have pressed upon Abraham’s mind: “Is Ishmael the one or not?” As the baby grew into a child and a young man, it began to be obvious to Abraham and Sarah that Ishmael might not be the fulfillment of God’s promise. But how else could it be fulfilled? They were each getting older and older; Sarah was now 90 years old, and obviously could no longer bear a child. Or could she?

And then, an angel appeared to Abraham to tell him he would literally father a child by his beloved Sarah. Abraham laughed (in astonishment? in disbelief?). And so the angel told him, “The child will be named Yitzhak (Isaac)” — which means “laughter”! Sarah, hearing of this renewed promise, laughed also, and was rebuked. The angel said,

“Why did Sarah laugh, and say, ‘Shall I indeed bear a child, now that I am old?’ Is anything too hard for the LORD? At the appointed time I will return to you, in the spring, and Sarah shall have a son” (Gen 18:13,14).

And it happened! Twenty-five years after the original promises, Sarah finally bore a son, Isaac. And there must have been incredible joy. For the desire, finally fulfilled, became a “tree of life” (both then, for Abraham and Sarah and their descendants; and especially in the future, in the divine “seed” that came through Abraham and Isaac — the Lord Jesus Christ)!

David and the throne

As a teenager, the humble shepherd David was anointed by the great prophet Samuel to be king of all Israel. With the help of God he won a great victory, against Goliath and the Philistines; he returned from battle to the sounds of women singing his praises. Yet even as he did so well, his success inspired the envy and hatred of king Saul, who plotted to kill him. The young man David had to flee for his life. For years he lived in exile, existing from hand to mouth, constantly on guard against a sudden attack from Saul and his men.

During all this time, all these long years, when was David going to become king, as God had promised? Twice David was tempted with the opportunity to slay Saul; but no, he knew he must not lift his hand against the LORD’s anointed.

So how much longer did David have to hold out? Psalms written during this time of exile express his frustration in trying to do the right thing, while hiding in the hills, far away from the peace and comfort of a settled home.

“I cry with my voice to the LORD, with my voice I make supplication to the LORD. I pour out my complaint before him, I tell my trouble before him. When my spirit is faint, thou knowest my way! In the path where I walk they have hidden a trap for me. I look to the right and watch, but there is none who takes notice of me; no refuge remains to me, no man cares for me. I cry to thee, O LORD; I say, Thou art my refuge, my portion in the land of the living. Give heed to my cry; for I am brought very low! Deliver me from my persecutors; for they are too strong for me!” (Psa 142).

Can you not feel the truth of the proverb?: a hope deferred, a sick heart, intense frustration. What could David do? He could only look to God, pray to Him, trust in Him. God was the only way.

And finally, after many years, the way opened up. Saul was slain by the Philistines. David could now assume his kingdom. And here’s the fulfillment in David’s life of the last part of the proverb (a desire fulfilled; a tree of life): when he brought the ark of God to its permanent resting place in Jerusalem:

“So David went and brought up the ark of God from the house of Obededom to the city of David with rejoicing; and when those who bore the ark of the LORD had gone six paces, he sacrificed an ox and a fatling. And David danced before the LORD with all his might; and David was girded with a linen ephod. So David and all the house of Israel brought up the ark of the LORD with shouting, and with the sound of the horn” (2Sa 6:12-15).

Application to us

And so it may be for each of us: finally, our desires are fulfilled. The barren couple, waiting and waiting, finally rejoices when they discover she is at last pregnant. The young lady, biding her time, finally meets the right young man, who loves her as she loves him. The coveted job turns out to be in a department that is suddenly terminated; so missing that promotion is, in fact, a Godsend.

But what do we do when the hope deferred continues to be deferred? when there seems to be no light at the end of the tunnel? when nothing changes for the better?

There are only two options:

Give up, turn your back on God, and say, “I simply can’t take it any more. I quit.” Or… Realize that God might have something else in mind for you, and that the fulfillment of your particular desire — at least for now — does not fit into His plan. And then you do the best you can with what you have.

Conclusion

Darrell Royal was a great football coach at the University of Texas. One day he was asked why he hadn’t changed quarterbacks in a crucial game at the end of the season, when his starter — who had won so many games for him — was for once not playing well. Coach Royal quoted the girl at the party, who was asked for a dance by a stranger. “No, thanks,” she said. “I’ll dance with the one that brung me!”

God brought us into this life. He has been so good to us in countless way. And He has promised that He will never leave us nor forsake us.

We “dance” with God because, almost two thousand years ago, He gave His only-begotten Son for us. And that Son, Jesus, died and rose again so that we might have life, and life more abundantly. Together, God and Jesus have invited us to the “party” of their Kingdom. Jesus said, “To him who conquers I will grant to eat of the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God” (Rev 2:7).

And we know that, one day soon, when Jesus returns, every desire WILL be fulfilled, and we WILL eat of that tree of life.

(WB)

Hosea, overview

The name Hosea means, in Heb, “Yah is help” or “Salvation”. He was contemporary with the more famous Isaiah, whose name is very similar. The name finds an echo in Hos 13:4: “I am the LORD your God from the land of Egypt; you know no God but me, and besides me there is no SAVIOR.”

Outline

1. The unfaithful wife and the faithful husband: Hos 1:1 – 3:5
a) Hosea’s wife and children: Hos 1:1 – 2:1
b) Judgment on faithless Israel: Hos 2:2-13
c) The restoration of faithless Israel: Hos 2:14-23
d) Hosea’s redemption of his faithless wife: Hos 3:1-5
2. The unfaithful nation and the faithful God: Hos 4:1 – 13:16
a) Israel’s unfaithfulness: Hos 4:1 – 6:3
b) Israel’s punishment: Hos 6:4 – 10:15
c) The Lord’s faithful love: Hos 11:1 – 14:9

Theme

The most prominent symbolism in Hosea’s prophecy is the marriage relationship as a parable of God’s relationship with His covenant people; this reflects an aspect of the help God gives to His people. Because of her unfaithfulness, God had “divorced” Israel; He had previously regarded her as His wife, but He now repudiates her. The prophets repeatedly refer to this symbolic relationship between Israel and God (Jer 3:8,20; Isa 50:1; Eze 16:32,38; cp also Eph 5:23; Rev 17:4,5; 19:7; 21:9), but nowhere else than in Hosea is it acted out so dramatically.

God is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance, and even the hundredth straying lamb is carefully searched out. The children of Israel are the seed of Abraham; therefore they are the kernel of God’s purpose and “the apple of His eye”, so that despite their rebelliousness and faithlessness He continues to watch over them, and will never make a full end of them. He says to Hosea, “Go again, love a woman who is beloved of a paramour and is an adulteress; even as the LORD loves the people of Israel, though they turn to other gods” (Hos 3:1). The displeasure which God feels at Israel’s sin in departing from her Master to worship Baal takes the form of a loving husband’s feelings toward a grossly adulterous wife: feelings which are perhaps at once the most mixed, and the most harrowing, which it is possible for a man to experience. How strong must have been His yearning desire to go forth and accept the least sign of repentance on her part. Yet at the same time, how intense His feelings of loathing toward her abominations!

In the naming of Gomer’s children (of which some seem not to have been fathered by Hosea) there is found this mingled compassion and loathing: The second child was named “Lo-ruhamah”, which means “without compassion”, or “without pity” (Hos 1:6,7).

God contrasts His great compassion toward the Southern Kingdom of Judah with His lack of compassion toward the Northern Kingdom of Israel. And so God allows the overthrow of Israel by the kings of Assyria, but He saves Jerusalem and Judah from the same Gentile power by a miraculous destruction of Sennacherib’s great army. The third child was “Lo-ammi”, which means “not my people” (v 8)… “for you are not my people, and I am not your God” (v 9).

Yet, because of His own covenants of promise to Abraham, God cannot allow this to be the permanent condition of His people Israel. The apostle Paul takes up these words from Hosea in Rom 9:25,26. Paul points out that the breaking off of Israelite branches has made room for the grafting of the Gentiles into the true olive tree, and then also speaks of God grafting natural Israel back in again. And he speaks of those who previously had not obtained the mercy of God, at last obtaining His mercy again (Rom 11, esp vv 30,31).

In the purpose of God concerning a final restoration of Israel, a reunited kingdom is envisioned, so that as the northern kingdom has no future separate existence, only the return of Judah from captivity is referred to. In Hosea’s day the faithful ones in Israel went over to support the kingdom of Judah (Hos 6:1; 2Ch 11:13,16,17; cp Eze 37:16-20). To indicate the Messianic application in the future, the meaning of the names are reversed; the negative (“Lo-“) is removed from “Ruhamah” and “Ammi” (Hos 1:10,11) — so that the names now signify “MY compassion” and “MY people”. After continuing “many days without a king” and all the things that make for a divine nation (Hos 3:4), Israel will finally “return and seek the LORD their God, and David their king; and they shall come in fear to the LORD and to his goodness in the latter days” (v 5). (Here is indicated a Last Days application of the prophetic parable.)

“They shall go after the LORD, he will roar like a lion; yea, he will roar, and his sons shall come trembling from the west; they shall come trembling like birds from Egypt, and like doves from the land of Assyria; and I will return them to their homes, says the LORD” (Hos 11:10,11).

“Shall I ransom them from the power of Sheol? Shall I redeem them from Death? O Death, where are your plagues? O Sheol, where is your destruction?” (Hos 13:14).

“They shall return and dwell beneath my shadow, they shall flourish as a garden; they shall blossom as the vine, their fragrance shall be like the wine of Lebanon” (Hos 14:7).

Throughout the book of Hosea Israel and Judah are accused of relying upon Egypt, Assyria, and their own fenced cities, and of worshiping idols and the calves of Samaria. These evils brought appropriate recompense upon them. In the meantime, therefore, captivity in Egypt and Assyria will be their lot, and their king will be dethroned (Hos 7:11; 8:14; 13:1,2; 9:3,6; 10:3).

Israel having ignored the word of God revealed in His commandments, their faithfulness is described as “whoredom”, or “adultery” (Hos 1:2; 4:2,10-14; 5:3,4; 6:10; 7:4; 8:1; 9:11-14; 13:13). Yet, in spite of all, God would reinstate them (Hos 11:8-11). As he originally called Israel out of Egypt, so He would do so again. They would return from their false worship to the recognition of the one true God whom their fathers had worshiped.

What happened in a limited sense in OT times (with the return of Israel from Babylon to their land under the leadership of Ezra, Nehemiah, Zerubbabel, Haggai, and Zechariah) will happen once again in the Last Days. Indeed, it has begun to happen already, with the return of millions of Jews from Europe (and now from the former USSR); but this return is only a preliminary — for there is no real acknowledgment of the hand of God in modern Israel’s affairs.

However, this state of affairs can change rapidly, when the children of Israel realize that they can no longer rely on their peace treaties with surrounding nations (like Egypt), nor the support of their former ally the United States, nor even their own military might. Age-old enemies will finally find the means to defeat them in battle. Then, like an adulterous wife who knows at last that there is neither comfort nor security in the arms of another, Israel will turn back to her God. “And I will have pity on Not pitied, and I will say to Not my people, ‘You are my people’; and he shall say ‘Thou art my God’ ” (Hos 2:23). The history of Israel, a pattern for the future?

“Whoever is wise, let him understand these things; whoever is discerning, let him know them; for the ways of the LORD are right, and the upright walk in them, but transgressors stumble in them” (Hos 14:9).

How Jesus used the Old Testament

HOW JESUS USED THE OLD TESTAMENT PROPHETS IN HIS GOSPEL TEACHING

1. In addition to citing Moses and the Psalms to establish and endorse his teaching, Jesus called on the writings of the prophets to reinforce and emphasize his teaching (cf Luke 24:44; Mat 5:17; 22:40).
2. Jesus could have argued that his teaching was correct and worthy of acceptance because he was God’s Son — but he did not. Old Testament Scripture was equated with the word of God, and that was sufficient to give his teaching divine authority (cf John 5:37-40; 8:45-47).
3. For Jesus, Scripture could not be broken, that is, it was inherently true and must be fulfilled; Old Testament teaching should not be watered down or replaced by the words of men (cf John 10:34-38; 17:17; Mat 15:1-6).
4. Jesus invariably argued his points using an Old Testament phrase or idea (eg, Mat 12:38-42; 13:11-17; 21:16,33-43; 23:29-39; John 6:45).
5. Jesus clearly understood and presented Scripture in a way quite different from all others (eg, Mark 1:27; Mat 22:15-22; John 6:52-69); he opened up the understanding of the Old Testament, primarily because they spoke of him and he was able to explain the meaning (eg, Luke 4:16-21; John 5:39). So Jesus makes the Old Testament teaching come alive, and renders it much more comprehensible (cf Luke 24:25-32; Acts 1:3).
6. But Jesus did not introduce any new teaching in the sense that it contradicted or repudiated the Old Testament teaching. The Old Testament is the basis of all New Testament teaching, and Jesus’ message is the same as the message of the prophets — for example:
(a) the Lord’s prayer taught in Mat 6:9-13 has 1Ch 29:10-13 background,
(b) the two great commandments taught in Mat 22:36-40 tied together Deu 6:5 and Lev 19:18, and
(c) the prediction of Jerusalem’s overthrow and Christ’s return taught in Mat 24:15 cites Dan 9:27.
7. Jesus “filled full” the predictions about the suffering Savior (cf Luke 24:25-27,44-47), confirmed the promises made in the Old Testament (Mat 5:17; cf Acts 3:18; 13:33; Rom 15:8), and will be the completion of the Old Testament prophecies about the returning Christ (eg, Luke 21:7-36). However, the subject of this article is not so much how Jesus fulfilled/will fulfill the Old Testament prophets as how he used their writings in his teaching.
8. The four Gospel accounts record the actual teaching situations of Jesus and therefore are the best source of information to determine how he used the Old Testament prophets. Of the many examples available, four are taken from each Gospel to provide a sampling sufficient to draw some conclusions.

Matthew

  1. Mat 9:10-13 cites Hos 6:6 — to teach the leaders that they should go and learn what “desire mercy” means.

  2. Mat 11:7-15 quotes Mal 3:1 — to teach the people about the greatness of the prophet John the Baptist (cf Mat 17:10-13).

  3. Mat 13:10-17 quotes Isa 6:9,10 — to explain why he taught in parables, and why the apostles were privileged to understand.

  4. Mat 24:3-28 cites Daniel’s prophecy (Dan 9:27; 11:31; 12:11) — to explain the signs of his coming and the end of the age to the apostles.

Mark

  1. Mark 2:23-28 cites the story of David in 1Sa 21:1-6 — to show that the Sabbath was made for man and that Jesus was Lord of the Sabbath.

  2. Mar 7:1-8 quotes Isa 29:13 — to expose the hypocrisy of the Pharisees (their traditions and external cleansings).

  3. Mar 7:21-23 builds on Jer 4:14; 7:24; 17:9 — to remind the disciples of a key teaching, namely, that the human heart is the source of all evil thoughts, etc.

  4. Mar 8:31; 9:31; and 10:33,34 are a series of Old Testament references — to plainly teach the apostles of his impending death and resurrection… yet they did not understand!

Luke

  1. Luke 4:16-31 quotes Isa 61:1,2 — to show how he was fulfilling Scripture before their very eyes, in their very hearing.

  2. Luke 11:29-32 cites Jon 3:4,5 and 1Ki 10:1 — to use Jonah and the Ninevites and the Queen of Sheba and Solomon as examples to prompt his hearers into belief in himself as the Messiah, who was much greater.

  3. Luke 13:6-9 uses Jer 8:13 and Hos 9:10 as the background for his parable of the fig tree — to give a warning to Israel of its impending destruction.

  4. Luke 21:20-24 talks of Old Testament predictions such as Lam 2:8,13 and Mic 3:12 soon to be fulfilled — to give a warning to Jerusalem of its impending destruction.

John

  1. John 2:13-16 alludes to Zec 14:21 and Jer 7:8-11 — to explain his ousting of the temple moneychangers and to remind his disciples that the temple cleansing must happen.

  2. John 7:38 consolidates the teaching of Isa 44:3; 55:1; 58:11; Joel 3:18; and Zec 13:1 — to help the Jews understand that he was the promised Messiah.

  3. John 12:12-16 enacted Zec 9:9 — to show the people and the disciples that he was the promised king.

  4. John 17:6-19 claims that the Scriptures were now fulfilled — to emphasize that the time spent developing his disciples was according to God’s will.

Conclusions

  • Belief in the prophetic message demands belief in Jesus and a corresponding change in life.

  • Understanding the Old Testament is made easier by having the New Testament writings, especially the words of Jesus.

  • Fulfilled Scripture concerning Jesus’ first coming indicates the certainty of fulfillment of Scripture concerning his second coming; that time seems to be near!

  • We need to use the whole Bible in order to understand God’s message of salvation to us.

  • Jesus used Old Testament Scripture to instruct himself (cf 2Ti 3:16,17); disciples should do likewise.

(NF)

Hurricane!

HURRICANE ISABEL September 22, 2003

The past week we had an unwelcome visitor at our home — appropriately named Hurricane Isabel. As you may know, Isabel is a form of the name Jezebel, wicked wife of King Ahab of Israel. The storm has generated a few random thoughts that I would like to share with you.

By the storm reached our area, it was, statistically speaking, fairly unimpressive. It had degraded from a hurricane to a tropical storm. It had wind gusts of only 65 miles per hour (100 km per hour). Yet, despite this meager statistical display, it all but shut down the metropolitan Richmond area of close to one million people. I have about 5 large trees down in my yard. My parents have about an even dozen down in their yard. Most of these trees are so large you can’t get your arms around them. We lost power on last Thursday night and as of today, Tuesday, we still do not have power back on. This is true for several hundred thousand people in the area.

It is amazing to me just how powerful nature is in the hands of God. We sometimes fool ourselves into thinking how clever we are or how powerful we are as humans. When we consider the force of a hurricane, the power of a flood or the energy released by an exploding volcano, we can only stand back in awe.

It is also very interesting just how vulnerable we all are. The recent loss of the power grid in the eastern coast of North America is yet another example of how fragile is our technological house of cards. Imagine the chaos if many of the mishaps happened at once in a sort of domino effect. The huge storm knocks out the power grid which causes a nuclear accident which… you get the picture. I don’t mention this to upset people or to be a predictor of doom; the point is that we have to faith in something greater than technology and man’s ability to control everything. It doesn’t take much. One lousy tropical storm has created what will surely be billions of dollars of damage in Virginia alone.

Another thing that this storm has brought to mind is the nature of man. Events like those of the past week tend to bring out the best and the worst in people. On the morning after the storm, most of the neighbors around me checked on each other. The men got together and helped those who had problems. We removed a tree that blocked one neighbor’s driveway. We helped another neighbor remove a tree that had toppled onto the top of his barn. Strangers helped clear debris from the roads and get cars out of ditches.

Of course, there were also those people whose civility was carried away by the hurricane. My parents’ road was nearly impassable due to downed power lines. As this was a main thoroughfare, people were having to drive on the shoulder of the road to get past. The man whose house was in front of this shoulder was out early blocking the path with debris from the storm so people would not drive on the side of the road — thus rendering the road completely impassable. You also hear stories of price gouging and people arguing over scarce resources such as ice.

One last thing that this storm brought to mind was just how soft we have become. Now I am not pointing fingers at people when I say this. After making sure our families and neighbors were okday, we took off for a hotel at the beach to get to electricity, running water and telephone service. It made me think about how just 200 years ago none of these conveniences would have been disrupted, as they didn’t have them anyway. These men and women of old knew how to survive. They could make what they needed — grow or kill what they needed to eat. Today, if the Quickie Mart and Burger King are closed, we are in a heap of trouble. It makes me wonder what will happen when the time spoken of by Daniel comes to pass. “And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.”

By God’s grace, may we all be prepared for that Day — not with survivalist gear, but with the faith of Abraham.

(KT)

Golgotha

GOLGOTHA: The site of Golgotha and Garden Tomb:

What do we know about the site of the tomb?

  1. It was rock-hewn (Mar 15:46).
  2. “In the place” (Joh 19:46), “near at hand” (Mar 15:42).

  3. A private garden belonging to a rich man (Mat 27:57).

The traditional site, where the “Church of the Holy Sepulchre” is located today, was probably inside the city walls at that time, and thus disqualified… for Jesus was crucified outside the city.

Another possibility, “Gordon’s Tomb”, was discovered in 1867 — north of the old city, near the Damascus Gate, under a hill somewhat resembling a skull. (An English explorer named Gordon discovered and excavated this tomb.) The entire area was found to be honeycombed with tombs dating to first century. One tomb nearby bore the inscription: “Buried near my Lord”.

The sepulchre is in what was obviously once a garden — a small level yard with a few fruit trees and plants. At the north end is a high perpendicular wall. There is an opening with a runway suitable for a rock wheel, and a burial room about 10 feet square.

Golgotha signifies “skull”, from the Hebrew “galal” = circle (cp Galilee). Most likely, then, it was this hill north of Jerusalem, on the Damascus Road, where criminals were executed. To it was attached the name of “Skull” because

  1. it was the place of death,
  2. shaped like a skull, with recesses for eyes, mouth, etc,

  3. and perhaps the site where Adam died [it is an ancient tradition that Adam died at what later became Jerusalem]; and

  4. perhaps the site of the burial of Goliath’s head/skull.

If the ancient tradition is correct, that Golgotha derived its name from being the burial place of Adam… then here, supposedly, was laid to rest the skull of the first Adam; and here, also, the last Adam came to restore that which his predecessor lost.

A more likely supposition, however, is that Golgotha was the site of the burial of the skull of Goliath (1Sa 17:54). Thus Christ, in his death, figuratively bruised the head of the serpent (Gen 3:15) just where David buried the head of the Philistine, the “man of sin”.

Good Samaritan (Luk 10)

Out of the crowds that followed Jesus , a lawyer stepped forth one day with a question to test the new rabbi: “Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” (Luk 10:25). Was this a sincere question or another attempt to catch him at his words? Whichever it was, Jesus treated the question and the questioner respectfully. His first answer, however, was not really an answer at all, but rather another question, which turned the testing back upon the lawyer. It would lead him, if he had an open mind, to a searching self-examination of belief and practice: “What is written in the law? How readest thou?” (Luk 10:26).

“And he answering said, ‘Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind: and thy neighbour as thyself’ ” (Luk 10:27).

It was an excellent answer, showing an insight into the law born of deep and prayerful study. He had thus linked together two commandments from separate parts of the Torah (Deu 6:5; Lev 19:18). On a later occasion Jesus himself did the very same thing in response to the query as to what was the greatest commandment (Mat 22:39).

“And Jesus said unto him, ‘Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live’ ” (Luk 10:28).

There is a great gulf between reason and response, between theory and practice, between hearing and doing. To so answer was relatively easy; to do was another matter altogether. And so it is for all of us: Love as a Biblical concept, and the mystical expression of love for God, are often on the lips of His children. But the practical expression of that love is a difficult business.

The lawyer now sought “to justify himself” (Luk 10:29): “Who is my neighbour?” Evidently he thought the first part of the great commandment was no problem for him; after all, what right-thinking, religious person did not love God with all his being? But the penetrating gaze of this rabbi and the finality of his admonition — “This DO!” — left even this confident lawyer a trifle uneasy at his position in regard to the second half. In so asking he betrayed the weakness of those who concentrated upon the meticulous observance of the law; he was anxious to know the exact limits of his obligations. Who were those who in his particular situation had claims upon him? Was it not possible that he was already obeying the law — even in this matter?

As he so often did, Jesus answered a question with a parable that at first glance was not an answer at all. It was a story, however, which would be very familiar to his listeners.

A certain man was descending the dreaded “Way of Blood” that led from Jerusalem to Jericho. Though it was a dangerous journey — for the twists and turns of the rocky path offered numerous places for brigands to hide — he traveled alone. And, sure enough, he fell among cruel thieves and was left to die.

It so happened that a priest came down by that way, and passed by on “the other side”; likewise, a Levite. These paragons of sacrifice and ritual would not be detoured from the fulfillment of their duties; with averted eyes they hastened on. One can imagine the many possible ways by which they would have sought to justify themselves in such neglect. Perhaps they were even so close together that each was aware of the other’s failure as well as his own.

The priest might have thought: ‘My work is most important; I will let this lesser Levite behind me tend to this rather unpleasant business.’ And the Levite might well have said to himself: ‘The priest did not bother; and his calling to keep the Law is higher than mine; why should I?’ None of us are such strangers to the act of self-justification that these excuses or a dozen like them would seem totally unreasonable. No doubt we can all recall “reasons” for failing to do our duty that were just as flimsy when later held up to the clear light of Scripture.

And looking upon him, they both passed by on the other side! The lesson is obvious: this man was a “stranger” to them; why should they be inconvenienced by someone who might be a grievous sinner? Indeed, perhaps they feared defilement! ‘We might be partakers of this man’s sins.’ In Christ’s analogy they plainly loved self more than they loved any “neighbor”. This was a fault no less to be rebuked simply because it was induced by a rigid doctrinal view of “holiness”. Their special Bible interpretations added to their legalistic duties (“Touch not, handle not the unclean thing”), but those same interpretations sadly detracted from what they should have readily recognized as practical duties. The lesson must not be lost on us. (A few years ago an ecclesia planned a special lecture, with considerable advertising. A large number of visitors attended, but of them all only one finally accepted the Truth and was baptized. And she did not attend because of any media advertising, but solely because — on the very day of the lecture — a brother played the part of “Good Samaritan” to a motorist in distress.)

But a certain Samaritan — one of the race despised by the “elite” Pharisaic Jews — happened also to come that way. Having compassion upon the fallen Jew, whom he might have left to his fate with more justification than did the other two, he went to him. Binding up his wounds, setting him on his own beast, he brought him safely to the inn. In so doing, the Samaritan brought upon himself grave personal danger — the thieves might have still been around. Furthermore, it was a messy and troublesome job to bind up the man’s wounds. And also, he experienced a real material loss; two pence was not a small sum (by Mat 20:2 it would represent two days’ wages).

Christ himself is to be seen in the parable. Surely it is worth noting that his enemies at least once denounced him as a Samaritan (Joh 8:48), perhaps in reference to the peculiar circumstances of the marriage of Joseph and Mary, or perhaps because of his fearless association with that hated nation (Joh 4:40). Christ is our neighbor, coming near to us in our fallen condition, showing mercy to those who do not deserve it. We have all descended the road of blood toward the city of the curse (Jos 6:26); we have all been wounded by sin and we have all lain near death. At great personal risk and inconvenience and loss, even at the expense of legal defilement, Christ has stopped, and stooped, to help us. He has reinforced that lesson: “Go, and do thou likewise!”

The Samaritan in the parable is pictured as telling the innkeeper, into whose hands he committed the wounded man: “Whatsoever you spend in his care, even if it be more than I have given you, I will repay you” (Luk 10:35). Those who follow his example, even at risk to themselves, who go the extra mile to bear with and help a fallen brother, to bind up wounds in the ecclesia, pouring in the oil of kindness and love… those who do such things will never lose anything. There is no danger in such a policy of self-sacrifice. “I will repay thee”, are the words of Christ.

“And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ’s sake hath forgiven you” (Eph 4:32).

“Christ suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps” (1Pe 2:21).

And now the lawyer’s question is put to him: “Which of these three was neighbour to the man who fell among thieves?” The answer was inescapable, but even then the fastidious Jew could not bring himself to name the man by race. So instead: “He that shewed mercy on him.” A neighbor is one who shows mercy, who offers help and love to those who do not deserve it. Even the most blatant self-interest leads us to love those who love us; there is no special sacrifice in this. True love that emulates the Master must stretch out to include those who may be separated from us. Ceremonial purity may pass by on the other side, holding its garments aloof, that it be not touched by the fallen condition of others. But true love looks upon misfortune, stops to help, binds up wounds, pouring in wine and oil, and walks step by step with those who have fallen, until they all come safely to the inn.

Before we go too far afield to find the neighbors we should love, let us look around us, at a divided, problem-riddled Christadelphia. Let us consider the brethren who hold the Truth just as we do, but who need a helping hand to be bound again to the brotherhood. Let us consider our attitudes toward those “other groups” who may be so close to us in beliefs but whom we put so far away in practice; are they our “Samaritans”?

“The Samaritans were neighbours in the most literal sense, but as for loving them, that seemed impossible. Christ loved them and caused his disciples to marvel at the manner in which he spake to the woman at Jacob’s well and afterwards to others who came out to hear him. The Jews as a whole almost made it a part of their religion to hate the Samaritans, and if they were able to analyze their own feelings they would probably have to admit that the hatred was directly traceable to the fact of their being such near neighbours. This is a common weakness of poor human nature. Those who are near but not quite with us arouse more bitterness of feelings than complete strangers. Then when such an evil feeling has been once started, the deceitful heart begins to build up fancies to justify the hatred, thus further traducing those who have already been wronged” (GL 66).

Good shepherd

The Good Shepherd

“On the roads of Palestine, and on the hills, you see the good shepherd. He comes along at the head of his flock, generally carrying over his shoulders a lamb or an injured sheep.

“A most remarkable thing is the sympathy that exists between him and his flock. He never drives them as our own shepherds drive their sheep. He always walks at their head, leading them along the roads and over the hills to new pasture: and, as he goes, he sometimes talks to them in a loud sing-song voice, using a weird language unlike anything I have ever heard in my life.

“Early one morning I saw an extraordinary sight not far from Bethlehem. Two shepherds had evidently spent the night with their flocks in a cave. The sheep were all mixed together and the time had come for the shepherds to go in different directions. One of the shepherds stood some distance from the sheep and began to call. First one, then another, then four or five animals ran toward him; and so until he had counted his whole flock.

“More interesting than the sight of this was the knowledge that Jesus must have seen exactly the same sight and described it in his own words: ‘He calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out. And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice. And a stranger they will not follow…’ This parable spake Jesus unto them. ‘I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine’ ” (HVM 154).

“I notice that some of the flock keep near the shepherd, and follow whithersoever he goes, without the least hesitation, while others stray about on either side, or loiter far behind; and he often turns round and scolds them in a sharp, stern cry.

“Not unlike the Good Shepherd. Indeed, I never ride over these hills, clothed with flocks, without meditating upon this delightful theme. Our Saviour says that the good shepherd, when he putteth forth his own sheep, goeth before them, and they follow (John 10:4). This is true to the letter. They are so tame and so trained that they follow their keeper with the utmost docility… Any one that wanders is sure to get into trouble.

“Some sheep always keep near the shepherd, and are his special favorites. Each of them has a name, to which it answers joyfully; and the kind shepherd is ever distributing to them choice portions which he gathers for that purpose. These are the contented and happy ones. They are in no danger of getting lost or into mischief, nor do wild beasts and thieves come near them. The great body, however, are mere worldlings, intent upon their own pleasures or selfish interests. They run from bush to bush, searching for variety or delicacies, and only now and then lift their heads to see where the shepherd is…

“Did you ever see a shepherd gather the lambs in his arms, and carry them in his bosom (Isa 40:11)? Often; and he will gently lead along the mothers, in those times when to overdrive them even for a single day would be fatal (Gen 33:13)” (LB 202-205).

Gospel, the

“Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned” (Mar 16:15,16).

“But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women” (Acts 8:12).

“For I [Paul] am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek” (Rom 1:16).

“And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed” (Gal 3:8).

The word ‘gospel’ means ‘good news or tidings’. It comes from the Greek word ‘euangelion”, which occurs 101 times in the New Testament. Although the word ‘gospel’ is a New Testament word, its roots are firmly fixed in the Old Testament. As Gal 3:8 (see above) shows, the gospel was preached thousands of years before Jesus was born. To understand the good news preached by Jesus and his disciples, the good news taken by Paul out into the Roman Empire, the good news we receive today, we must appreciate that its origins are to be found at the beginning of time. Indeed, the Apostle Peter states that the gospel he preached had been preached “since the world began” (Acts 3:21). The four references above set out clearly the importance of the gospel and give a framework for understanding it:

  1. to believe the gospel brings salvation
  2. to disregard the gospel brings damnation
  3. if the gospel is believed then baptism must follow
  4. the gospel message is information about the Kingdom of God and the work of the Lord Jesus Christ
  5. the hope of salvation is available to all men and women of all nationalities
  6. faith (belief) that God will accomplish His purpose of bringing salvation through Jesus comes through hearing the gospel message
  7. the gospel we receive today is the same gospel that Abraham believed 4,000 years ago.

The gospel in both Old and New Testaments

The writings of the Apostle Paul show clearly that the gospel message existed before he began his ministry. Before the Lord Jesus Christ was born it was spoken of by the prophets of the Old Testament, preached to Israel in the wilderness and believed and acted on by Abraham (Rom 1:1,2; 2Ti 3:15; Heb 4:2; Gal 3:6-9).

The New Testament describes the gospel as “the hope of Israel”, and Paul and all those who accepted and believed this gospel identified their faith with that of Abraham and faithful men and women in Israel of old (Acts 26:6,7; 28:20; Rom 4:11; Gal 3:29).

The work of Jesus was “to confirm the promises made unto the fathers: and that the Gentiles might glorify God for His mercy” (Rom 15:8,9). The gospel/good news is that God through Christ fulfils the promises to Abraham and Israel, and thus opens up a way of salvation, that all men and women might have eternal life in His Kingdom on this earth (Acts 13:32-39). Resurrection from the dead, a physical experience, is the great hope enshrined in the promises of God, and faith in this is at the heart of the true gospel (1Co 15:20-26; Psa 71:20,21; Isa 26:19; Joh 11:21-27). Abraham had faith in the resurrection from the dead, as Heb 11:13-19 shows. Two incidents in his life especially demonstrate this. Gen 15 shows Abraham asking, “whereby shall I know that I shall inherit [the land]?” (v 8), and he is reassured that, even though he will die “in a good old age”, God has made a covenant with him to give him his eternal inheritance (vv 15,18). Gen 22 contains the story of Abraham being prepared to offer his son Isaac, and in so doing demonstrating his faith in resurrection from the dead (Heb 11:19).

The things concerning the Kingdom

When Philip preached the gospel to the people in Samaria, “the things concerning the kingdom of God” were an important part (Acts 8:12). It was necessary for people to know and understand about the Kingdom prior to being baptized. This Kingdom was the one that Abraham believed in and looked forward to, being described in the promises made by God to him (Gen 12:1-3; 13:14-17; Gen 15). Abraham expected the Kingdom to be on the earth, as can be seen from Rom 4:13: “For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith”. Stephen, the first martyr, points out that Abraham still awaits the fulfillment of the promises made by God concerning the earthly Kingdom: “He [God] gave him none inheritance in it, no, not so much as to set his foot on: yet He promised that He would give it to him for a possession” (Acts 7:5). Heb 11:39,40 confirms that Abraham will inherit this earthly Kingdom along with faithful believers at a future time.

Jesus “went about… preaching the gospel of the kingdom”, as did his disciples (Mat 4:23; Luk 9:2,6,11). When he was born, the message of the angel was, “the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: and he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end” (Luk 1:32,33). Here is the link to the descendants of Abraham, showing that the Kingdom will be an everlasting Kingdom reigned over by Christ.

Jesus taught his followers to pray, “Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven” (Mat 6:10), having the same expectation as that of Abraham. Along with his teaching, Jesus performed miracles, which gave a cameo of what the Kingdom will be like. The blind received sight, the deaf heard, the lame walked, disease was cured; he even raised the dead. The poor were justly treated and the hungry fed. Even the wind and waves obeyed his voice. His teaching showed men and women how to live and worship. This was a foretaste of the Kingdom spoken of by the prophets (Isa 35; Psa 37:11; 72; Mic 4:1-4).

The things concerning the name of Jesus Christ

To live for ever in this wonderful Kingdom it will be necessary for death to be overcome. Death is a punishment for sin, and every one save Christ deserves to die (Gen 3:17-19; Rom 5:12). As Paul says, “the wages of sin is death”; but he goes on to say, “…but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord” (Rom 6:23). That is why Christ says, “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad” (Joh 8:56). Abraham looked forward to the time when the Son of God would make it possible for death to be overcome through his sinless life. Hebrews confirms that Jesus came to put away sin, and in his sacrifice our sins are forgiven (Heb 9:11,12,26; 10:10). Jesus did not die instead of us, but his sacrifice is the means by which our sins are forgiven and we can be made immortal (1Co 15:3,4,20-23).

Paul teaches that it is belief in the things of the Kingdom and the work of Jesus that leads to baptism into the saving name of Jesus (Rom 6:1-6), and in baptism we are linked to Abraham and his faith (Gal 3:26-29).

So the gospel that has been preached for thousands of years holds out to all men and women the hope of eternal life in God’s Kingdom on the earth reigned over by Jesus Christ.

Gospel and its social implications

Through the years we have all spent considerable time studying Bible prophecy and the events surrounding Jesus’ Second Coming. But we may have been less interested or concerned with the social and ethical consequences of our prophetic faith. The obvious danger of this deficiency is that we may be tempted to draw simplistic political conclusions from our study of prophetic details.

Many of us believe that, according to Bible prophecy, a Last Days Arab confederacy will attempt to annihilate Israel (Psa 83:1-8; Zec 14). Many of us also believe that the leader of such a confederacy will be a Middle East political figure, probably an Islamic Arab. Some others think the leader will be a Russian political figure. Either way, it is also believed, with good reason, that such an anti-Israel force will be destroyed by divine power.

What political conclusions do we draw from this? We might conclude that God is siding with the modern state of Israel and against the “evil” Arabs and/or the “evil” Russians. This in turn might lead us to endorse any and all of Israel’s actions, no matter how immoral or unjust. The irony is: we could end up favoring completely unbelieving Jews against Palestinian or Russian Christians.

The apostle Peter told Cornelius and his family:

“God does not show favoritism but accepts men from every nation who fear him and do what is right” (Acts 10:34,35).

And the apostle Paul wrote:

“You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek… “

— he could as easily have written, “neither Jew nor Arab, neither American nor Russian nor Iraqi nor Palestinian” —

“… slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal 3:26-28).

So, even if the final enemy of God (according to prophecy) will be an Arab (or a Russian) leading an Arab and/or Muslim coalition, this does not mean that all present-day Arabs (or Russians) are enemies of God. Nor will it mean that every Arab will prove to be evil when that time does come. During the holocaust, not every German was a Nazi. Some German Christians protested Hitler’s actions. Some even risked their own lives to save Jews.

Similarly, not every Jew or Israeli is a child of God. When some of the Jewish elite questioned Jesus’ teaching, and protested that “Abraham is our father” (John 8:39), Jesus disagreed:

“If you were Abraham’s children… then you would do the things Abraham did… You belong to your father, the devil… “

— a charge equivalent to “seed of the serpent” or “brood of vipers” (Mat 3:7; 23:33) —

“… He who belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that you do not belong to God” (John 8:39,47).

God is not on the side of modern Israel as opposed to the Arabs. He is rather on the side of His children, those from all nations who have called on the name of the Lord (Rom 10:11-13).

But, having said this, we should not conclude either that God has rejected natural Israel:

“Did God reject his people? By no means! I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin. God did not reject his people, whom he foreknew” (Rom 11:1,2).

And so there is a very real tension in our prophetic studies… because Last Days prophecies do indicate that God will save Israel from the hostile Arab forces that opppose it. Can we resolve this tension?

Yes, by understanding that God will save Israel (really, a remnant of Israel) not because they are natural sons of Abraham, but because they (the remnant) will have become true believers in the God of Abraham and the Son of that God:

“If they do not persist in unbelief, they will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again… Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in. And so all [true] Israel will be saved, as it is written: ‘The deliverer will come from Zion; he will turn godlessness away from Jacob. And this is my covenant with them when I take away their sins’ ” (Rom 11:23,25-27).

The phrase “when I take away their sins” indicates a cleansing for Israel (true Israel, the “remnant”), brought about through their repentance and faith (see, for example, Zec 12:10 — 13:3, which is the prelude to Zec 14).

But we do well to remember, in the meantime, that God is not truly on the side of unbelievers (no matter what their ethnicity), and that we must be careful not to champion nationalistic states when their actions are ungodly. In the conflicts yet to come, we must favor neither nationalistic Israel nor nationalistic Arab, but Christ!

“If you belong to Christ, then [and then only] you are [truly] Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise” (Gal 3:29).


Acknowledgment: Some of the above is drawn from an article by Mark Mattison in The Restitution Herald, Oct-Nov 1994.