Mark 16

Mar 16:1

As soon as the Sabbath restrictions were past, ie after sunset on Saturday — the 3 women (close companions of Christ in life) prepare to give their last token of love to their Lord in his death. Early on Sunday morning, at first light in the east, they set out for the tomb. (Did the women make two separate visits to the tomb? See Mat 28:1n.)

Mar 16:2

VERY EARLY: As the “sun” rose: Psa 19:4; Mal 4:2.

THE FIRST DAY OF THE WEEK: Lit, “day one of the seven”. The beginning of a new creation week! Cp Gen 1: a new creation, “day one”! God had said, “Let there be light”, and now there was! Cp Col 1:15-18: Jesus the beginning of the new creation! To the disciples, this day (when they understood it later) would mark the beginning of their new lives. This new “Sun” of the morning was to drive away the dark shadows of lost hope, and create a new spirit within the disciples (Isa 9:1,2; 2Co 4:6).

Mar 16:3

ROLL… AWAY: “Apokalusei”, ordinary word, in contrast v 4.

Mar 16:4

LOOKED UP: “Anablephasai”, lit. “looked up backward”.

WHICH WAS VERY LARGE: Codex Beza adds: “A stone which 20 men could scarcely roll” (Dobson 76). It is the great size of the stone which made them wonder at its position.

ROLLED AWAY: “Anakulindo” = to roll backwards from (cp Joh 20:1).

Was ever a mountain so “large” as the great stone which sealed Christ’s tomb? Truly, as miracles go, no miracle has been or could be so great as the one that caused this “very large” stone to be removed, and thus proclaimed Christ’s tomb to be open… forevermore.

Jesus had told his followers, “I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him’ ” (Mar 11:23). Of course, we have trouble with moving literal mountains, even as we have trouble explaining this passage.

But seen from a spiritual perspective, isn’t the greatest “mountain” of difficulty — which no man can move — death and the grave? Engineers with bulldozers and explosives can move even literal mountains. But who among them can move the mountainous “stone” that covers the grave? Not a one!

And even the disciples of Jesus could not move such a stone from the mouth of his sepulcher… not at that time; they were weeping in sorrow, and hiding in fear. It was the faith of Jesus alone — though he was dead and unconscious in the tomb — that moved the hand of the angels of God, and rolled back the stone. It may be said that the greatest miracle that Jesus ever performed was this: the blood of this wholly righteous man cried out from the depths of the earth, and the Father heard!

Do WE, today, have faith to move mountains? The answer, I believe, is really another question: ‘Do WE have faith that the greatest “mountain” has already been moved?’ “Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours” (Mar 11:24). Our faith may be — not a prospective — but a retrospective faith: we look backward, and ask, ‘Do I really believe that the “mountain” has been moved?’ If we truly believe that, then — it is absolutely sure and certain — ALL THINGS are possible for us!

Mar 16:6

Had not their Great Teacher prophesied his own death and resurrection? And they foolishly supposed that he spoke in parables!

Mar 16:7

AND PETER: All the apostles needed to be saved from the despondency and bewilderment of the crucifixion. But none needed the resurrection more than Peter. He (the most enthusiastic, the most loving) would have died for Jesus, but his resolution quickly faded under the grim specter of suffering, when he crudely denied his Lord three times. Peter would have died for Jesus, but failed miserably. Instead, Jesus died for Peter!

” ‘Be sure and tell Peter that he’s not left out. Tell him that one failure does not make a flop.’ Whew! No wonder they call it the gospel of the second chance. Not many second chances exist in the world today. Just ask the kid who didn’t make the little league team or the fellow who got the pink slip or the mother of three who got dumped for a ‘pretty little thing.’ Not many second chances. Nowadays it’s more like, ‘It’s now or never.’ ‘Around here we don’t tolerate incompetence.’ ‘Gotta get tough to get along.’ ‘Not much room at the top.’ ‘Three strikes and you’re out.’ ‘It’s a dog-eat-dog world!’ Jesus has a simple answer to our masochistic mania. ‘It’s a dog-eat-dog world?’ he would say. ‘Then don’t live with the dogs.’ That makes sense doesn’t it? Why let a bunch of other failures tell you how much of a failure you are? Sure you can have a second chance. Just ask Peter. One minute he felt lower than a snake’s belly and the next minute he was the high hog at the trough. Even the angels wanted this distraught net-caster to know that it wasn’t over. The message came loud and clear from the celestial Throne Room through the divine courier. ‘Be sure and tell Peter that he gets to bat again.’

“Those who know these types of things say that the Gospel of Mark is really the transcribed notes and dictated thoughts of Peter. If this is true, then it was Peter himself who included these two words! And if these really are his words, I can’t help but imagine that the old fisherman had to brush away a tear and swallow a lump when he got to this point in the story. It’s not every day that you get a second chance. Peter must have known that… It was also enough, so they say, to cause this backwoods Galilean to carry the gospel of the second chance all the way to Rome where they killed him. If you’ve ever wondered what would cause a man to be willing to be crucified upside down, maybe now you know. It’s not every day that you find someone who will give you a second chance — much less someone who will give you a second chance every day. But in Jesus, Peter found both” (Max Lucado).

Mar 16:8

SAID NOTHING: Cp Mar 1:44: “See that you say nothing to anyone, but show self to the priest”, ie speak only to those intimately concerned (WMS 186).

THEY WERE AFRAID: They spoke to none but the disciples (ct Mat 28:8; Luk 24:9), being afraid of the others: reprisals by the priests, trespassing, theft of body.

Mar 16:9

Vv 9-20: Excluded from oldest NT mss. As to authenticity, see WRI 104-117; Xd 36:11; “Last 12 Verses of Mark” (Burgon); Comp. Prob origin of omissions in some early texts: These were church lectionaries, with daily (or Sunday) Bible readings marked off, and Mar 16:8 ended a reading.

The majority of NT scholars do not think this verse or the last 12 vv of Mark were written by Mark himself. They think that the original ending to Mark was lost and that these vv were added later by someone else. Nevertheless, and at the very least, these vv were written very early in the history of the church, for they are found in several manuscripts of Tatian’s Diatessaron (AD 170). They were also quoted by Irenaeus (who died in 202) and Tertullian (who died in 220). At the very least, therefore, these vv reflect what the early church thought about the purposes of miracles, even if these vv are not considered part of the original Scriptures.

HE APPEARED FIRST TO MARY MAGDALENE: Detail given in Joh 20:11-18.

Mar 16:12

V 12: More detail in Luk 24:13-33.

Mar 16:14

V 14: More detail in Luk 24:33-43.

THEIR STUBBORN REFUSAL TO BELIEVE: Hard-heartedness is first seen in Pharaoh (Exo 4:21; 7:3,13; 8:15,32; 9:12,34; 10:1,20,27; 11:10; 14:4,8). So when this description is used of anyone in Israel, it is very pointed: ‘You are being like the oppressing Egyptians from whom I have delivered you!’ Cp Deu 15:7; 2Ch 36:13; Psa 95:8; Isa 63:17; Mark 10:5; 16:14; John 12:40; Rom 2:5.

Mar 16:15

What saves us? Grace (Eph 2:8,9). Hope (Rom 8:24). Belief (Mar 16:15). Baptism (1Pe 3:21). Gospel, and its memory (1Co 15:1,2). Blood of Christ (1Jo 1:7). Faith (Rom 5:1). Works (Jam 2:24). Ourselves (Act 2:40). Endurance (Mat 10:22). What saved the “drowning man”? The rock, the rope, another man, himself…or all of them?

GO INTO ALL THE WORLD…: “The two great challenges which face the body of Christ today are not from rationalism, science, orthodox religion or ecumenism — even though all these have brought problems to us as they have to previous generations. They are materialism and the unfinished work of witness which lies upon us. Materialism implies that the present span of mortal existence is the supreme goal of human effort. In this connection, perhaps the Bible School movement may be viewed as one of the most important in our generation — offering a reminder that man does not live by bread alone, and providing an all too rare haven from a world seeking wealth, status, power and fame. And in relation to the second challenge, of worldwide witness, in the formation of the several Bible Mission committees and the work of those who voluntarily assist them, we may hopefully see a new determination to discharge our present responsibilities to a world adrift” (Prot 189).

GOOD NEWS: The gospel, the power of salvation to those who believe (Rom 1:16). The great doctrine of justification by faith. Belief and baptism: essential for salvation.

ALL THE WORLD: “Kosmos”, ie every part of society. // Mar 13:10: to all “nations” (ethnos, ethnic groups). // also Mat 24:14: the whole “world” (oikoumene: the whole habitable).

TO ALL CREATION: Or, “to every creature” (AV). That is, to Jew and Gentile alike (Mat 28:19; Act 1:8; note Joh 10:16; Mat 8:10,11; 10:32; 22:1-13; Rom 1:21-23; Rev 22:17).

Mar 16:16

WHOEVER BELIEVES: An incredible irony! Those who, just before, “did not believe” — in fact, who “stubbornly refused to believe” (vv 11,13,14) — are commanded to go into the world and show others HOW TO BELIEVE! “I was blind, but now I see!”

BAPTIZED: As in Mat 28:19.

SAVED: What saves us? Grace (Eph 2:8,9). Hope (Rom 8:24). Belief (Mar 16:15). Baptism (1Pe 3:21). Gospel, and its memory (1Co 15:1,2). Blood of Christ (1Jo 1:7). Faith (Rom 5:1). Works (Jam 2:24). Ourselves (Act 2:40). Endurance (Mat 10:22). What saved the “drowning man”? The rock, the rope, another man, himself…or all of them?

WHOEVER DOES NOT BELIEVE: “Some think it hard that there should be nothing for them but ruin if they will not believe in Jesus Christ; but if you will think for a minute you will see that it is just and reasonable. I suppose there is no way for a man to keep his strength up except by eating. If you were to say, ‘I will not eat again, I despise such animalism,’ you might go to Madeira, or travel in all lands (supposing you lived long enough!), but you would most certainly find that no climate and no exercise would avail to keep you alive if you refused food. Would you then complain, ‘It is a hard thing that I should die because I do not believe in eating?’

“It is not an unjust thing that if you are so foolish as not to eat, you must die. It is precisely so with believing. ‘Believe, and thou are saved.’ If thou wilt not believe, it is no hard thing that thou shouldst be lost. It would be strange indeed if it were not to be the case” (CHS).

Mar 16:17

See WS 51,52. All signs for authentication: valid in first century. Invalid in our times. (If not, then “drinking poison” and “handling snakes” should be equally a test of Holy Spirit possession, as “speaking in tongues”. Why aren’t they?)

Mar 16:19

V 19: More detail in Luk 24:50-53.

Cp Psa 16:11; 110:1. Psa 110:1 became the standard Ascension passage of the early church; it is used in Acts 2:34-36; 7:55,56; Rom 8:34; Eph 1:19-22; 2:6. Compare 1Ti 3:16 and 1Pe 3:22 with Mark 16:19. Also, see Psa 68:18: “You ascended on high.”

Luke Overview

Luke has the most universal outlook of all the gospels; he portrays Jesus as the perfect man with compassion for all peoples.

Whereas Matthew traces Jesus’ genealogy back to Abraham, the father of the Jews (Mat 1:2), Luke traces it back to Adam the father of the human race (Luk 3:38).

Luke is written for the Greeks. He substitutes Greek expressions for nearly all the Jewish expressions (“Amen” is one of the few exceptions), and he seldom refers to OT prophecy.   Luke was a skilled writer, and the literary quality of the Gospel of Luke is thought to be the highest of all four gospels. The literary structure of the Gospel of Luke is constructed primarily around Jesus’ ministry in Galilee and in Jerusalem.   Main Themes

• When He was in the synagogue at Nazareth, Jesus gave the keynote of His ministry by reading from Isaiah:

“The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, Because He has anointed Me to preach the gospel to the poor. He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted, To preach deliverance to the captives And recovery of sight to the blind, To set at liberty those who are oppressed, To preach the acceptable year of the Lord” (Isa 61:1- 2).

In Luke, Jesus’ life is presented as a commentary on this passage of Scripture:

  1.         He blesses the poor, the hungry, those who weep, and the excluded (Luk 6:20-23).
  2.         In one parable He takes the side of a beggar who sits outside the gate of a rich man (Luk 16:19-31); and in another parable He celebrates a tax collector who shies away from the Temple because of his sinfulness (Luk 18:9-14).
  3.         Jesus reaches out to a widowed mother who had lost her only son (Luk 7:11-17) and to a sinful woman (Luk 7:36-50).
  4.         In another parable the hero of mercy is a despised Samaritan (Luk 10:25-37); and after a healing, a Samaritan is praised for his gratitude (Luk 17:11-19).
  5.         The open arms of the Father, as in the parable of the Prodigal Son (Luk 15:11-32), await all who return to Him. Jesus’ identification with sinners leads Him to open His arms to them on the cross, where “He was numbered with the transgressors” (Luk 22:37).

• The Return of Christ is one of this Gospel’s main points and makes this gospel one of joy.

• Luke is a gospel of prayer.

  • The multitude prays as Zacharias serves at the altar (Luk 1:10)…
  • Mary prays at the news of salvation (Luk 1:46-55)…
  • Jesus prays at His baptism (Luk 3:21)…
  • When He chooses His disciples (Luk 6:12)…
  • At Peter’s confession (Luk 9:18)…
  • At His transfiguration (Luk 9:29)…
  • In the solitude of prayer Jesus takes the first steps of ministry (Luk 5:16)…
  • On the Mount of Olives (Luk 22:39-46)…
  • He gives His final breath back to God, “Father, into Your hands I commend My spirit” (Luk 23:46).

There are 10 parables recorded by Luke which are not recorded by the other gospel writers:

  1.         the good Samaritan (Luk 10:30-37);
  2.         a friend at midnight (Luk 11:5-13);
  3.         the barren fig tree (Luk 13:6-9);
  4.         the lowest room (Luk 14:7-14);
  5.         counting the cost (Luk 14:28-33);
  6.         the lost coin (Luk 15:8-10);
  7.         the prodigal son (Luk 15:11-22);
  8.         the unjust steward (Luk 16:1-13);
  9.         the importunate widow (Luk 18:1-8); and
  10.         the pounds (Luk 19:11-28).

Outline

Luke 1:1-4: Introduction Luk 1:5 – 2:52: The birth and childhood of Jesus Luk 3:1 – 4:13: Preparation for the ministry — John the Baptist; Jesus’ baptism; Jesus’ temptation Luk 4:14 – 9:50: The ministry in Galilee — Teaching through parables; teaching through healing Luk 9:51 – 19:40: The ministry continues on the way to Jerusalem Luk 19:41 – 21:38: The ministry in Jerusalem — prophecy Luk 22:1 – 24:53: The crucifixion, resurrection and ascension


Luke 1

Luk 1:1

Luke’s gospel presents Christ the man: the friend of publicans and sinners (Luk 5:29; 7:29; etc), going beyond national ties (Luk 6:6; 10:30). Special notice of women throughout. Only gospel addressed to one man (Luk 1:3). Most artistic of the 4 gospels.

Luke portrays Christ as the man of constant prayer: Luk 3:21 (baptism); Luk 5:16 (in withdrawal and seclusion); Luk 6:12 (all night in prayer); Luk 9:18 (in private); Luk 9:29 (Transfiguration); Luk 11:1 (“Teach us to pray”); Luk 18:1-14 (the parable of importunate widow); Luk 22:32 (prayer for Simon); Luk 22:41-45 (in Gethsemane); Luk 23:34,46 (at crucifixion).

…And the man of universal compassion: Luk 7:11-16 (the miracle of life for the bereft widow); Luk 7:37-50 (forgiveness for the sinful woman); Luk 13:11-17 (release for the despondent cripple); Luk 17:11-19 (cleansing for the despised alien); Luk 19:1-10 (approval for the social outcast); Luk 22:50,51 (care for the smitten enemy); Luk 23:39-43 (hope for the penitent thief).

MANY: Implying need for a sound history. “The gospels written by Mark and Luke have a place in the NT, although the authors were not apostles; yet the writings of the ‘many who took in hand to set forth in order a declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us’, to whom Luke refers, are not in the NT. What governed the inclusion of some and the exclusion of others? The answer is to be found in the belief the Jews entertained that the ‘collection of the sacred books was defined under Divine guidance, and closed at the Divine command.’ The proof is in the pages of the Bible” (Orac 65).

Luk 1:2

FROM THE FIRST: A criteria of apostleship: being with Jesus from the “beginning”: Act 1:21; 1Co 15:5,8; Joh 15:27; 1Jo 2:13.

EYEWITNESSES… OF THE WORD: The “word” is a title of Jesus Christ (cp Heb 4:12,13; Act 20:32; 1Pe 1:23; Rev 6:9; Joh 1:1, etc; cp //s between Luk 1:1-4 and 1Jo 1:1-3).

EYEWITNESSES: Gr “autoptes”: lit, self-seeing. Related to Engl “autopsy”: an examination for oneself of a dead body, for causes of death! “Greek medical writers often had the word” (RWP).

Why this word here? Because, whether at the beginning of his ministry or even after his resurrection, the living Jesus WAS a dead body! In “life” he was “dead” already. After his resurrection the emblems of his death were still visible! He was a man who was born to die, who lived a “death” to the flesh, and who — even now — is the Lamb who had been slain (Rev 13:8)! And those who deny him are spoken of as crucifying him yet again (Heb 6:6; 10:29).

Luk 1:3

CAREFULLY INVESTIGATED EVERYTHING: The presence of Holy Spirit does not remove need for effort and reason.

“The words ‘having had perfect understanding’ [AV] are, literally, ‘having closely traced.’ The verb means ‘to follow along a thing in the mind.’ The word was used for the investigation of symptoms. Thus it speaks of a careful investigation of all sources, oral and written, which purport to be accounts of our Lord’s life.

“Luke had the historian’s mind, a thing native to the educated Greek. Herodotus, the father of Greek history, exhibited the Greek determination to get at the truth no matter how much work it required, when he travelled to central Africa to verify the account of the annual rise and fall of the Nile River. In those days this was a long and difficult journey… Thus we have no doubt but that Luke made a personal investigation of all the facts he had recorded. He interviewed every witness, visited every locality. If Mary was still alive, he, a doctor of medicine, investigated the story of the virgin birth by hearing it from Mary’s own lips” (Wuest).

FROM THE BEGINNING: “Anothen” (sw Joh 3:31; 19:11; Jam 1:17; 3:17). Did he mean that he had been in contact with Jesus from the earliest days? Or did he mean that his information came from the highest authorities (eg Luk 1; 2 from Mary herself)? Or was he claiming direct guidance and inspiration from heaven, ie from above?

AN ORDERLY ACCOUNT: Not necessarily chronological, but certainly detailed and accurate and factual.

MOST EXCELLENT: Related to rank and authority: Act 23:26; 24;3; 26:25; cp Joh 20:31.

Luk 1:4

CERTAINTY: Lit “security”.

THINGS YOU HAVE BEEN TAUGHT: Gr word is related to English “catechism”, impl questions and answers, and constant repetition: ie Gal 6:6; Rom 2:18; Act 18:25; 21:21,24. Cp Pro 22:20,21.

Luk 1:5

HEROD: An Idumean, or Edomite: the first Gentile on the throne of Judah.

ZECHARIAH: Note that the OT prophecy of Zech is followed by that of Mal, which prophesies of John the Baptist.

ABIJAH: The eighth of the 24 courses; fittingly, eight is the numerical symbol of the cutting off of the flesh (the eighth day being the day for circumcision) and a new beginning (the eighth day also being the first day of a new week).

Luk 1:6

Very enthusiastic praise from Luke. Cp God’s words to childless Abraham: Gen 17:1.

Luk 1:7

BARREN: As Sarah (Isaac), Hannah (Samuel), wife of Manoah (Samson).

WELL ALONG IN YEARS: Cp Gen 18:11.

Luk 1:8

So many priests in this time that lots were drawn, and this is prob a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity! (Some say there were then 20,000 priests: WGos 9.)

Luk 1:9

INCENSE: Psa 141:2.

Luk 1:10

ALL THE ASSEMBLED…: “The whole multitude” (KJV) implies one of the great feast days. Poss Pentecost: the course of Abijah was on duty at that time of year (WGos 10).

PRAYING: Symbolized by the incense.

Luk 1:11

RIGHT SIDE: Side of blessing (Gen 48:11; ct Eze 4:4) and acceptance (Mat 25:31; Rev 5:7; 10:1).

Luk 1:12

This was the least likely place on earth to find a stranger. Cp Amos’ vision — an angel at the altar with woeful judgment (Amo 9:1-10).

Luk 1:13

DO NOT BE AFRAID: Cp Luk 1:30; Mat 28:5; Luk 2:10; Rev 1:17.

YOUR PRAYER HAS BEEN HEARD: For son, AND for Messiah? How awesome it is that the God of all creation makes His own mighty purpose dependent upon the prayers of His people!

JOHN: Sig “the gift or grace of Yahweh”.

Luk 1:14

HE WILL BE A JOY AND DELIGHT TO YOU, AND MANY WILL REJOICE BECAUSE OF HIS BIRTH: The joy and gladness for this woman who has conceived in her old age — a reference back to Sarah, who laughed (Gen 21:6), so that all who hear shall laugh with her? See also Pro 23:24.

Luk 1:15

HE WILL BE GREAT: Cp Mat 11:11: none greater than John the Baptist.

FROM BIRTH: Or “from his mother’s womb” (mg): cp Isa 49:1; Psa 22:9,10.

Luk 1:20

SILENT AND NOT ABLE TO SPEAK: Zechariah’s affliction of dumbness was more than the rebuke for a momentary lapse. It was a marvelous symbol of the end of an age. Zechariah could not pronounce the required blessing upon the waiting multitude, and from that day forward the priesthood of which he was a member could no longer mediate true blessings upon the nation. The end was in sight, a greater priest of a greater order was soon to appear, and the whole Mosaic system — having waxed old — was now almost ready to vanish away (Heb 8:13). Even Zechariah’s son, as he grew to manhood, would disdain the duties of a priest and go out into the wilderness, as though to watch and wait for the Lord, who would come not OUT OF the temple, but TO the Temple (Mal 3:1). “The Law and the Prophets were proclaimed until John. Since that time, the good news of the kingdom of God is being preached” (Luk 16:16). The law was holy and just and good; it had been given by angels to Moses, but its purpose was now fulfilled. Grace and truth would come by another (Joh 1:17). Zechariah’s son would go out into the desert of Judea to meet him.

SILENT: Poss also deaf (cp Luk 1:62).

Luk 1:21

WHY HE STAYED SO LONG: Priests were instructed to be expeditious in their service in the Holy Place.

Luk 1:22

HE COULD NOT SPEAK TO THEM: This day the priest was unable to impart God’s blessing in the Law’s required manner. See Luk 16:16.

Luk 1:24

SECLUSION: Separating herself from all ordinary social contact, perhaps by remaining and working in the Temple (cp Luk 2:36).

Luk 1:25

TAKEN AWAY MY DISGRACE: The words of Rachel in Gen 30:23.

Luk 1:26

Luk 1:26-38: The story of the conception and birth of Christ might be appreciated in the light of Psa 139: “For thou didst form my inward parts, thou didst knit me together in my mother’s womb. I praise thee, for thou art fearful and wonderful. Wonderful are thy works! Thou knowest me right well, my frame was not hidden from thee, when I was being made in secret, intricately wrought in the depths of the earth. Thy eyes beheld my unformed substance; in thy book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them. How precious to me are thy thoughts, O God! How vast is the sum of them!” (Psa 139:13-17, RSV).

The phrases” knit together” and “intricately wrought” are the same words used of the woven pattern on the veil of the Tabernacle, and the embroidery of the door hangings, the coat of the High Priest, and the veil of the Most Holy (Exo 26:31,36; 27:16; 28:39; 36:37; 38:18; 39:29; cp Heb 10:20).

Christ is the true tabernacle, or temple of God (Mat 12:6; John 1:14; 2:19; Col 2:9; Heb 8:2; 9:7,8,11). Even as the fabrics were specially selected, and specially worked, until the desired effect was achieved in the curtains and furnishings and priestly garments of tabernacle and temple — so that God Himself might be exalted, and eternal principles taught in figurative language — so out of the “fabric” of human nature, the Master Craftsman skillfully selected and wove together… the perfect “tabernacle”, the perfect “temple” — His Son!

Modern science has begun to penetrate into the mysteries of DNA, the genetic code imprinted on the human chromosome, and to see — as through a glass darkly — the building blocks of human life. Surely we may stand in awe at the amazing complexity, and the supreme design, in such a system. And especially may we be brought to our knees in admiration — for the intricate “design” that became God’s Only-begotten Son. “Fearfully and wonderfully made” indeed!

GABRIEL: “The angel of answered prayer” (WGos 10,718): see Dan 8:15,16; 9:21-23; Luk 1:13,19).

Luk 1:28

YOU WHO ARE HIGHLY FAVORED: KJV has: “Blessed art thou among women”, as in v 42.

THE LORD IS WITH YOU: Blessing of the Lord of the harvest: Psa 129:7,8; Jdg 6:12; 2Th 3:16.

Luk 1:29

WHAT KIND OF GREETING THIS MIGHT BE: Was it mere flattery, after eastern custom, or did it have real meaning?

Luk 1:30

DO NOT BE AFRAID: Cp Luk 1:13; Mat 28:5; Luk 2:10; Rev 1:17.

YOU HAVE FOUND FAVOR WITH GOD: Implies an earlier request: Gen 19:19; 34:11; 47:29; Exo 33:13; 34:9. To find favor implies a request answered, and we could draw the conclusion that this young, pure, Jewish woman may have been praying, though never really expecting a favorable answer: “May I be the mother of the Messiah.” This would be in keeping with one traditional Jewish view of Isaiah 7:14: that a virgin would marry and then conceive (by natural means) a son who would become the Messiah, but not lit the Son of God. Since Mary and Joseph were both of the house of David, perhaps such thoughts had come to her. And since up to this point the Holy Spirit has not been mentioned, Mary might reasonably conclude that this child will be the son of Joseph.

Luk 1:32

THE THRONE OF HIS FATHER DAVID: Jesus is both legal and spiritual heir of David’s throne: Eze 21:25-27; Rev 3:7; 5:5; Act 2:29,30; Mat 1:1; 2Sa 7:14.

Luk 1:33

HIS KINGDOM WILL NEVER END: Cp 2Sa 7:16; Psa 89:35.

Luk 1:35

THE POWER OF THE MOST HIGH WILL OVERSHADOW YOU: The language of Gabriel calls to mind that of Gen (cp Gen 1:2, LXX); the Spirit of God “overshadowing”, or “moving upon” the face of the waters to bring forth life, as a mother hen brooding over her eggs and then her chicks. A direct parallel to the natural creation; this is the beginning of the spiritual, or new, creation. It is a picture of vast creative power, yet nonetheless tenderness and love. It is a picture of a God who sustains all things by His omnipotence, who acts as and when He chooses, and no man can understand, much less question, His prerogative. But also it is a picture of a God who is a Father, who pities His children, who lavishes mercies unnumbered upon those who can never hope to repay Him. “Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed on us…” (Cp Exo 40:35: the cloud abode on the tent of the congregation, and the glory of Yahweh filled tabernacle.) Cp also Joh 1:14.

TO BE BORN: Present participle: “is being born!” Ct v 31: the conception is already happening.

THE SON OF GOD: If the pre-existent Christ were already the Son of God before his birth, how could being born of a woman MAKE him the Son of GOD? If anything, it would make him the son of MAN!

References in Psalms to the Virgin Birth: (a) Psa 22:9,10: The AV mg has: “kept me safe”. This was fulfilled in Mat 2:13-16. (b) Psa 69:8: “My brethren” = “my mother’s children”, but not “my father’s children” — implying that Jesus had no human father! (c) Psa 71:6: “You brought me forth, or upheld me from the womb!” (d) Psa 86:16 / Psa 116:16: Cp with Luke 1:38,48: Mary is the “handmaiden” of the LORD, and in these words she gives her consent which is necessary for the conception of the unique child in her womb. (e) Psa 89:26,27: “I will appoint him my firstborn”. Cp Col 1:15,18. The “first Adam” and “last Adam”: referring to the one who is “firstborn” not just by his birth, but by his special selection by his Father, and especially by his overcoming of sin and death. (f) Psa 110:3: Why does David call him “Lord”? Because, though born after David, Jesus is greater than he — being the son of the Most High. See v 3: “From the womb before the morning I begat thee” (LXX). (g) Psa 132:11: “From your belly” (AV mg) — ie, not “loins” (as of paternal origin), but “womb” (maternal origin). This is the same word in 2Sa 7:12. Cp with Luke 1:42.

Luk 1:36

RELATIVE: Either (1) Mary’s mother was of Levi, or (2) Elizabeth’s mother was of Judah (Tes 23:248).

Luk 1:37

Cp with Mat 17:20: “Nothing will be impossible for YOU.”

Luk 1:38

I AM THE LORD’S SERVANT: Mary knew the passages in the psalms in which the Messiah is called the son of God’s maidservant (Psa 86:16; 116:16.) Immediately she makes the connection, and gives her consent to become the mother of His Son, a consent which is essential to His purpose. A veil is now modestly drawn over the scene. Of the actual conception Luke tells us nothing, and we must conclude that such knowledge is too sacred for mortals. How was this miracle accomplished? In the jargon of modern science, what was the “genetic code” begotten of such a union? Prudence counsels us to explore no further along these lines than Scripture expressly warrants. But perhaps Psa 139:13-17 gives us an insight into this greatest of all mysteries — God manifest in the flesh.

Mary gives her consent; that was essential too. Doing what God did without the consent of the young woman would have been equivalent to rape! (I say this in all seriousness, although it may seem offensive even to put the thought into words… but believe me, I am saying it with the greatest reverence I can produce, and with the highest regard for the monumental awe with which we should view this act of creation, or procreation. Could it have been any other way? Could God have forced Himself upon an unwilling woman, or one who didn’t understand what was happening?)

There may have been, shall we say, a dozen qualified couples at approximately the right time and place as Mary and Joseph. God chose the only woman who would, and could, agree… that meant a woman who had prepared herself in faith even before the divine approach. And Mary’s own song (in Luk 1:46-55) shows what an extraordinary young woman she was, and how well she knew the Scriptures.

So… Mary was in the right place at the right time — that was God’s providence. And she said, “Yes” — that was her faith. God’s providence and a woman’s faith… from this came the Saviour of the World.

SERVANT: Cp 2Sa 7:25,28.

Luk 1:39

Mary went to see a visible confirmation of the power of God — as an aid to her own faith.

HURRIED: Great eagerness.

THE HILL COUNTRY OF JUDEA: The tableland to the south and sw of Jerusalem, centered about Hebron. Hebron may have been the city of Zechariah and Elizabeth (Jos 21:11). But another village in this area was named “Juttah”, near Maon (Jos 15:55; 21:16), and poss it is the one referred to here. It would have been an unusual trip for a just-betrothed young woman to undertake, and it would naturally arouse the curiosity of the townsfolk of Nazareth. After she returned three months later (v 56) Mary’s condition would no longer be concealed, and the flickering curiosity would be fanned into a fire of suspicion and denunciation.

Luk 1:41

THE BABY LEAPED IN HER WOMB: And so Elizabeth knew the purpose of Mary’s visit by divine revelation.

Luk 1:42

BLESSED ARE YOU AMONG WOMEN: Borrowed and included in v 28?

Luk 1:43

THE MOTHER OF MY LORD: Great as her own son was to be (v 15), Mary’s son would be greater yet. An understanding of his divine parentage!

Luk 1:44

THE BABY IN MY WOMB LEAPED FOR JOY: See Rom 8:22: “We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time.”

Luk 1:46

At birth, 4 songs: Mary (Luk 1:46-55), Zechariah — for John (Luk 1:67-79), angels (Luk 2:14), and Simeon (Luk 2:29-32).

MY SOUL GLORIFIES THE LORD: Mary recalls words of Hannah (1Sa 2:7-10) and David (Psa 113:7,8). This phrase supplies the popular title to Mary’s song: “The Magnificat”. Mary’s words are drawn from Psa 34:2,3, wherein David praises God for His overshadowing protection. Even when His children are afflicted (Psa 34:19) God’s angel encamps around them, to deliver them (Psa 34:7). Also, Psa 40:16, where David has spoken prophetically of a greater who would “come” (Psa 40:7), of whom the “scroll” contained wonderful promises, whose heart would be filled with delight for the law of God (Psa 40:8). Mary carried within her womb that special One, in whose mind the law would be engraved, one whose every action would “magnify” his Heavenly Father.

Luk 1:47

GOD MY SAVIOR: Mary already appreciates the significance of her son’s name: Jesus, “Yah-shua”, “God my Savior”. See Psa 35:9; Hab 3:18.

Luk 1:48

HE HAS BEEN MINDFUL: “He hath looked upon” (ASV). Mary is reflecting how God “looked upon” Elizabeth and also gave her conception — “looking upon” is an idiom for answered prayer or God’s response to human request (Gen 6:12; 29:32; Exo 2:25; Deu 26:7; Jdg 6:14). All this implies that Mary like Elisabeth had requested to have this child — to bear the Messiah. She sees what God has done as His mercy to her (1:50), as if a request had been granted. Cp idea, Luk 1:30.

THE HUMBLE STATE OF HIS SERVANT: Mary’s home in Nazareth was humble, and her family was poor. Her lineage, from great king David, was exalted; yet in Roman-occupied Palestine this was of no consequence. David’s house had sunk to the low estate that Isaiah envisioned, when he prophesied that a special “Shoot” or “Branch” would spring from the “stump” or “root” of Jesse (Isa 11:1n). The “root” was Jesse, not David his famous son, in order to indicate that David’s house would have fallen into obscurity, as it had been when David himself, the youngest and least likely of Jesse’s sons, was chosen and anointed by Samuel (1Sa 18:18,23). The “cross” that Mary was called to bear would bring her a great “humiliation” — a humiliation that would climax when a “sword” would pierce her own soul (Luk 2:35), and her son, great David’s heir, would be exposed to a cruel, mocking crucifixion.

ALL GENERATIONS WILL CALL ME BLESSED: Yet her own generation did everything but bless her! But she was strengthened with the blessed assurance that the “cursing” was for only one lifetime, and that all generations to follow would “bless” her and her son.

Mary’s prophecy has been wonderfully fulfilled, even though most often in superstition and ignorance. One might even suggest it has been “over-fulfilled”, since millions of deluded apostates have elevated the peasant girl of Galilee to a status that would horrify her if she only knew: “Mother of God”, “Queen of Heaven”, “Mediatrix”. True believers will of course repudiate such grossness while at the same time not losing sight of the real Mary, blessed above all women. Mary was not a Roman Catholic “saint”; she was a righteous woman chosen by God for a glorious role.

Luk 1:49

THE MIGHTY ONE: Echoes the OT title of God, El Gibbor, picturing God as a mighty warrior. It appears to be an odd title to use in the circumstances, until it is remembered that Mary’s son would be the “arm” of Yahweh (v 51) to do battle with the forces of sin, first in himself, and then in the world when he comes to take his throne.

Luk 1:50

HIS MERCY EXTENDS TO THOSE WHO FEAR HIM: Mary recognized God as being unique and separate, the epitome of all righteousness (Psa 99:3; Exo 15:11; Isa 6:3; 1Sa 2:2), so pure that He cannot behold sin (Hab 1:13; Psa 5:4).

FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION: Yet blended with that awesome holiness there is also ongoing, abounding mercy, “from generation to generation”, a mercy that does not reward us according to our sins (Psa 103:10,11), but instead provides us with the perfect covering for our sins.

Luk 1:51

MIGHTY DEEDS: The militant character of God is still in Mary’s thoughts (cp 1Sa 2:4-8). This expression recalls the redemption of Israel from Egypt, memorialized in Moses’ song of victory (Exo 15:6,7,12,13). Mary has faith that God will deliver His people from a greater bondage than Egyptian slavery — not from subjection to Rome, though that has its part, but from servitude to sin and death: “For Christ our passover has been sacrificed” (1Co 5:7).

Luk 1:52

BROUGHT DOWN RULERS… LIFTED UP THE HUMBLE: Her son’s contemporaries would revile him, and persecute him, and scoff at all he held most precious. His followers would be “everywhere spoken against”. The proclamation of the cross would appear weak and foolish to worldly men, but one day the tables will be turned. One day the “poor” will be made rich, and they that “hunger” after righteousness will be filled (v 53; Mat 5:6). One day the meek will roar like lions and inherit the earth (Mat 5:5). And one day those who have humbled themselves under the mighty hand of God will be exalted by His grace (1Pe 5:6).

Luk 1:53

THE RICH: Cp parable of publican and sinner praying: Luk 18:10-13.

Luk 1:56

THEN RETURNED HOME: Not to Joseph’s house. He has not yet been informed, but soon her pregnancy will become obvious (Mat 1:18-24). Mary had received a wonderful blessing, but her path through life had become infinitely more difficult. Just how difficult it would be she would discover when she returned to Nazareth.

Luk 1:59

TO CIRCUMCISE THE CHILD: Cp Gen 17:5,13,14: “It was customary to name male children at their circumcision, and females when weaned” (Spk).

AFTER HIS FATHER ZECHARIAH: To commemorate the special Temple revelation.

Luk 1:62

THEY MADE SIGNS TO HIS FATHER: Not necessarily that he was deaf, but perhaps so as not to offend Elizabeth.

Luk 1:63

JOHN: Sig “grace”. Following the era of the law and prophets, the first written word of the new dispensation was “Grace” (Luk 16:16; Joh 1:17).

Luk 1:64

PRAISING GOD: In the words of Luk 1:67-79.

“The gift of speech is a wonderful gift and we are apt to take it for granted. Like many other things, we usually do not appreciate something unless it is lost or is in danger of being lost. Think a minute about John the Baptist’s father, Zacharias. He was dumb and could not utter a word for about nine months. One moment he could converse and the next not a sound would come out. For nine long months it was like this. When he could speak again, what did he say? Did he complain and go on about how terrible it was not to be able to talk? Did he ask for pity? No, he praised God. He used his voice to glorify his Creator who had struck him dumb and had opened his mouth. He lived out the truth expressed by Job, that ‘the Lord gives and the Lord taketh away; blessed be the name of the Lord’ ” (BL).

Luk 1:65

Vv 65,66: The result of Zechariah’s song. Many laid up these things in their hearts (Luk 2:19,51).

Luk 1:66

EVERYONE WHO HEARD THIS WONDERED ABOUT IT, ASKING, “WHAT THIS IS THIS CHILD GOING TO BE?”: John, as he grew, provided a necessary protection and diversion to allow Jesus to grow and develop spiritually without fanfare. John was the “lightning rod”!

Luk 1:68

HE HAS COME AND REDEEMED HIS PEOPLE: This is language borrowed from the Exodus. In the burning bush God revealed Himself to Moses by His memorial name Yahweh (Exo 3:15) and sent him to the enslaved Israelites with the words of Exo 3:16,17 (cp Exo 4:31). God did redeem His people out of bondage by the blood of the passover lamb and the death of the firstborn, which things are incontestably an allegory of redemption in Christ.

REDEEMED: See Lesson, Redemption.

Luk 1:69

HORN: Sym power: Psa 75:4, 5; 89:17,24; 112:9; 2Sa 22:3. The figure of speech was used also by Hannah in her rejoicing at the birth of Samuel (1Sa 2:1,10).

The parallels between Samuel and John the Baptist are striking:

  1. Both were conceived miraculously.
  2. Both were of the tribe of Levi.
  3. Both demonstrated precocious intelligence.
  4. Both were filled with the Holy Spirit.
  5. Both pronounced judgment upon an evil nation.
  6. Both called the people of Israel to repentance.
  7. Both marked the end of an era: Samuel the end of the Judges period; John the end of the age of the prophets.
  8. Both were “forerunners” of righteous kings.
  9. Both prepared God’s way by fearlessly declaring His Word.
  10. Both anointed kings: Samuel anointed David at Bethlehem, and John “anointed” Jesus, by baptism, in Jordan.

Luk 1:70

HIS HOLY PROPHETS: The first such was Abraham (Luk 1:73; Gen 20:7; Psa 105:15).

Luk 1:71

SALVATION FROM OUR ENEMIES: See Gen. 22: 16,17. Many were the enemies of Israel, but the greatest “enemies” were sin and death. True salvation was wrought by Jesus, the seed of Abraham, in his defeat of the power of sin and his conquest, by resurrection, of the grave. The “gate of his enemies” captured by Christ is the “gate” of the grave and death (1Co 15:26, 55, 56; Rev 1:18; 20:6).

Luk 1:72

MERCY… REMEMBER… COVENANT… OATH (v 73): Cp name meanings of… John (grace), Zechariah (Yahweh remembers), and Elizabeth (the oath of El).

Luk 1:73

OUR FATHER ABRAHAM: See Gen 15:18; 22:16-18; Mic 7:20.

Luk 1:74

TO SERVE: That is, to serve as a priest.

WITHOUT FEAR: See Rom 8:15; Heb 2:14,15. Ct Luk 1:12.

Zechariah, with loosened tongue, rejoices in the language of Psa 18, which replicates the language of 2Sa 22. The fact that Zechariah uses the psalm and its historical background — a point made obvious by the use of the Psalm title — shows us that the setting up of David, in preference to Saul who was seeking David’s life, patterns the birth of Jesus and also John.

Luk 1:76

AND YOU, MY CHILD…: From a contemplation of the work of the coming Messiah, Zechariah now turns with loving affection to his own little son. The prophecies particularly relevant here are Isa 40:3-8 and Mal 3:1,2.

Luk 1:77

THE FORGIVENESS OF THEIR SINS: The remission of sins is the keynote here. Sin is the root cause of all bondage, oppression and fear. The Romans and the Herods were only secondary causes. The Coming One would not, like so many would-be “Messiahs”, hack away profitlessly at the “branches” of evil in government and society. He would instead root out sin at its source — the human heart. And he would provide his followers with the only reward worth striving for, the remission of sins: “For this is my blood of the [new] covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” (Mat 26:28).

Luk 1:78

THE RISING SUN: “Anatole”, sometimes translated “east”, may also signify “sun-rising” (Rev 16:12, RV), a ref to Malachi’s promised “Sun of righteousness” (Mal 4:2). But also, in a secondary sense, it signifies the “Branch” — from the idea of “springing up”. This sw, “anatole”, appears in the LXX in the Messianic passages of Jer 23:5 and Zec 3:8; 6:12.

Luk 1:79

// Isa 42:7.

Luk 1:80

DESERT: The rugged country on western shores of Dead Sea.

Luke 2

Luk 2:1

CAESAR AUGUSTUS ISSUED A DECREE: Luke is an inspired historian, who can therefore look into the heart of things and think on a grand scale. The story he presents is a fascinating interplay of Roman imperial authority and obscure Jewish compliance. But even the decrees of mighty Caesar are bent to the Divine purpose. Augustus, with all his armies and bureaucrats, is no more than a servant of God. For centuries the religion of freedom was destined to contend against the despotic power of a great empire, a totalitarian state which never hesitated to make the lowly masses subservient to its own will. (Such states have not gone out of style, and will not, as long as man is left to rule his own affairs. They have changed their names and ideologies, but not their essential characters.) Even in his birth the founder of the new religion was tossed to and fro at the whim of the emperor.

When he went to his death thirty-odd years later, it was again as a mere random piece of humanity, to be “processed” by the same state, one among many misfits and criminals impaled by Roman nails on Roman crosses.

The state had its purposes, but God had His. Each purpose was fulfilled, but how different they were! In ordering the enrollment, the state was seeking to achieve greater control over its subjects, and to lay the groundwork for taxation. God made use of these materialistic enterprises to fulfill the prophecy given by Micah, that His Son would be born in the little town of Bethlehem, thereby becoming governor and shepherd of Israel (Mic 5 :2).

Luk 2:2

THIS WAS THE FIRST CENSUS THAT TOOK PLACE WHILE QUIRINIUS WAS GOVERNOR OF SYRIA: The KJV uses “taxing” in the Old English sense of a census, although the collection of revenue was prob a secondary purpose. Luke, in using the word “first”, seems to be saying that another enrollment followed later. The second census, approx ten years later, is the one referred to in Act 5:37. At one time, since secular historians confirmed this census but knew nothing of an earlier one, Bible critics presumed that Luke had made a serious error in chronology. Recent discoveries have quite satisfactorily cleared up this confusion, by confirming the earlier census and substantiating Luke’s record:

“The first census (ie, enrollment prior to taxation) known to have occurred under the governorship of Quirinius took place later (ie, AD 6) than usually reckoned as the time of Jesus’ birth. Reference to this census is found in both Acts 5:37 and Josephus (Ant 18:26:2:1). Many have supposed that Luke confused this census of AD 6 with one he thinks was taken earlier, but which lacks historical support. The most satisfactory solutions that have been proposed: (1) Quirinius had a government assignment in Syria at this time and conducted a census in his official capacity. Details of this census may have been common knowledge in Luke’s time but are now lost to us. An incomplete ms describes the career of an officer whose name is not preserved but whose actions sound as if he might have been Quirinius. He became imperial ‘legate of Syria’ for the ‘second time’. While this is ambiguous, it may be a clue that Quirinius served both at the time of Jesus’ birth and a few years later. (2) The word ‘prote’ can be construed to mean not ‘first’, as usually translated, but ‘former’ or ‘prior’. The meaning of v 2 is then ‘This census was before that made when Quirinius was governor.’

“It was customary to return to one’s original home for such a census. Also, powerful as he was, Herod was only a client king under Rome and, like others, was subject to orders for a census. Furthermore, it is scarcely conceivable that Luke, careful researcher that he was (Luk 1:14), would have stressed the census unless he had reasonable historical grounds for doing so” (EBC).

Luk 2:3

Usually the Roman practice was to register people at their place of residence. This was not done in Palestine, prob because Jewish law and tradition attached people to their original tribal homes, not to their current residences. Because Joseph was of the “house and line of David” (v 4), it was necessary that he return to David’s land of inheritance, Bethlehem in Judah. It has been suggested that women would not have been required to travel back to their original family homes (LTJM 182).

Even if this were so, Mary would have desired to go with Joseph, since they could scarcely have been unaware of Micah’s prophecy (Mic 5:2; Mat 2:5,6). The decree of Augustus merely provided the reason, or the pretense, for their trip. This trip was, for both Mary and Joseph, a journey undertaken in conscious obedience to the will of God.

Luk 2:4

LINE: In addition to “house”, “line” suggests direct royal line of kings. Joseph might have been the true heir to David’s throne.

Luk 2:5

PLEDGED: Significantly, Mary is still called the “pledged”, “espoused” (KJV), or “betrothed” (RV), wife of Joseph. Even though she now lived in his house, Joseph nevertheless “had no union with her” (Mat 1:25), in accordance with his resolution, until after the birth of her son.

Luk 2:6

Out of apparent disarray, the right people come to the right place at the right time. How amazing is the providence of God! And the greatest wonder is that His providence still works today. “When the time had fully come,” Paul says, Jesus was born “of a woman… under the law” (Gal 4:4). She partook of the sorrow and pain of childbirth, passing under the curse of the law of Moses and becoming unclean. It was the shadow of a reality still to come, when the baby, grown to manhood, would, of his own volition, come under the curse of the law in death, that that curse might be once and for all removed (Gal 3:13).

Luk 2:7

Lesson, When God became a Father.

No human setting could improve upon the luster of this perfect “jewel”. Jesus’ status would not have been enhanced in the slightest if he had been born in a palace. Human ingenuity would have been baffled to contrive a fitting entrance into the world for God’s Son. But God would rather choose the weak things, and the lowly, so that nothing of the flesh can boast against His glory. He bids us enter the stable, where a lowly maid clasps to her breast a fragile newborn. In the darkness of that special night a tiny cry mingles with the mutterings of the beasts: “O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God!”

See Isa 1:3: Centuries before, God had uttered this plaintive cry. Now, in the stillness of the stable, the brute beasts turn quietly to gaze upon the “crib” where the prospective owner of all creation lies. But outside, the nation of Israel slumbers in darkness, not considering the wonder of the little baby in the manger, who will one day assert his right to universal dominion (Gen 1:28; Psa 8:6).

HER FIRSTBORN: “Her”, esp Mary’s. “Firstborn”: see Psa 89:27; Col 1:20.

(AND SHE) WRAPPED…: Implying there was no one to help her.

CLOTHS: Only here and v 12 in NT. A swath or slice of cloth. Swaddling clothes: his death and burial (wrapped in grave-clothes) was foreshadowed in his birth: cp Luk 23:53; Joh 11:44; 20:6. He was truly born to die!

MANGER: Occurs only Luk 2:12,16; 13:15. “Phatne” also denotes “a stall”. So not only a “manger” but, by metonymy, the stall or crib (Pro 14:4) containing the “manger”. Prob the cave under an upper room, where the animals were usually stabled (HVM 125). (Other early traditions say Christ was born in a cave.)

THERE WAS NO ROOM FOR THEM…: “Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head” (Luk 9:58).

INN: “Guestchamber”, the upper room (cp Luk 22:11; Jer 41:17).

Luk 2:8

Blessings given in the path of home duty: shepherds at night (Luk 2:8-20), Moses keeping flock (Exo 3:1,2), David in sheepfolds (Psa 78:70), Gideon threshing (Jdg 6:11,12), Abraham in tent-door (Gen 18:1), and a woman coming to draw water (Joh 4:7,26).

He came to his own, but his own received him not (Joh 1:11). But lowly country shepherds did receive him! God has chosen the weak things: 1Co 1:27.

LIVING OUT IN THE FIELDS: As late as mid-October (Targum, WGos 30).

KEEPING WATCH… AT NIGHT: The tower of Edar (sig flock) was located near Bethlehem (Gen 35:21; Mic 4:8; LTJM 1:186). Were these flocks destined for sacrificial services?

Luk 2:9

AND THEY WERE TERRIFIED: Always, it seems, fear was the natural first reaction to an angelic visitation (Luk 1:12, 29). When the angel appears to us, to take us away to judgment, will we fear? It is a great comfort to see that the all-too-human fear is so often met with the Divine message: “Do not be afraid” (Luk 1:13,30). May it be so with us!

“The angel of the Lord passed over the city of Jerusalem; there Herod and his courtly nobles held their drunken carousals, and there the religious rulers of the Jews were preoccupied with secular ambitions” (MP 16).

Luk 2:10

DO NOT BE AFRAID: So much of our lives is taken up with fears: fears for our families or our livelihood, fears of violence or of disease; sometimes, perhaps, nameless fears that paralyze action and even prayer. How often we need the reminder of the angel’s words: “Do not be afraid.” God is for us, so who can be against us? (see Luk 12:32).

I BRING YOU GOOD NEWS: The gospel itself.

OF GREAT JOY: Joy is the perfect opposite of fear. The joy of the gospel will cast out fear. We can know this joy, even in the monotony of daily life, or the “valleys” of trial and suffering. This joy can enable us to transcend the vague worries of the moment, because it is the foretaste of the Kingdom. It is all a matter of letting our minds feed upon the wonderful realities of the “good tidings” of Jesus.

Luk 2:11

TODAY: The angelic message has a great immediacy, which is echoed in other passages: “Zacchaeus, come down immediately. I must stay at your house today” (Luk 19:5); “I tell you, now is the time of God’s favor, now is the day of salvation” (2Co 6:2); and again, Paul cried to the Athenians, “But now (God) commands all men everywhere to repent” (Act 17:30).

IN THE TOWN OF DAVID: This links the child with the prophecies of the great king of David’s line, and the glories of his kingdom.

DAVID: Who was a shepherd himself!

A SAVIOR… WHO IS CHRIST THE LORD: When the angel was speaking to Mary, only the kingly aspect of Jesus was mentioned (Luk 1:32, 33). When Joseph was being assured that all was well, only the Savior aspect was mentioned (Mat 1:21). But now both are combined when the angel speaks to the shepherds.

HAS BEEN BORN TO YOU: There is about this announcement a universal appeal. “Christ is born to you,” the angel said. To you the shepherds, to you the outcasts, and to you — any man or woman who will receive him. “Whosoever will”, let him come and partake of this blessing. Christ is born to you!

Luk 2:13

A GREAT COMPANY: But at his death, Jesus was alone (Mat 26:53).

THE HEAVENLY HOST: See Gen 28:12; 32:1,2. Cp Job 38:6,7.

PRAISING GOD AND SAYING: Some people put clammy, pasty hands over our happy mouths and say, “The angels didn’t SING ‘peace on earth, good will to men.’ According to the Greek, they SAID ‘peace on earth, good will to men.’ ” But we can’t read that without something beginning to move in us. We get a rhythm; we get music in your heart. ‘Peace on earth, good will toward men,’ the angels SAID?! Surely the angels SANG at the birth of the Savior, and shouted for joy at the beginning of the “new creation” as they did at the beginning of the “old” (Job 38:7)! And we don’t need the concordance to prove it!

Luk 2:14

Angels sing of “peace” on earth; disciples sing of “peace” in heaven (Luk 19:38).

Luk 2:15

LET’S GO: The shepherds were willing to leave the “99” (v 8) and seek the “one”! Not even one of the shepherds needed to stay behind with the sheep — that night the flocks had “guardian angels” (Psa 34:7).

Luk 2:19

“His [Joseph’s] brothers were jealous of him, but his father [Jacob] kept the matter in mind” (Gen 37:11).

Luk 2:21

When the days of Mary’s purification were ended (forty days in all: Lev 12:2,4), Joseph brought her and the child to the temple at Jerusalem, just a few miles to the north. The purpose was twofold. Firstly, Mary must offer a sacrifice of cleansing from childbirth, in this case specified by Luke as two doves or two pigeons (the sacrifice of the poor: Lev 12:8). The second purpose was to present Jesus to the Lord (Luk 2:22), and to offer a sacrifice of money (five shekels) for the redemption of a firstborn son (Num 18:15,16). Jesus was born “of a woman… under the law” (Gal 4:4), and therefore in need of cleansing and redemption himself. However, despite the best efforts of Joseph and Mary, this child could not be truly redeemed with any gift but the sacrifice of himself. This he would accomplish more than thirty years later, in a sacrifice sealed by his own blood. All the laws of cleansing and purification were mere pointers, down through the ages, to this one who would become the perfect sacrifice, accomplishing his own redemption (Heb 9:11,12), and ours also, in prospect.

Luk 2:22

THEIR: KJV has “her”, but “their” is correct (RV). Jesus also needed purification.

JOSEPH AND MARY TOOK HIM: It was not essential that mother and child come to Jerusalem to perform these sacrifices, since they might be done by representatives (LTJM 1:194). This indicates, therefore, a continued residence in Bethlehem.

Luk 2:23

IS TO BE CONSECRATED TO THE LORD: Poss ref to firstborn at Passover in Egypt (Exo 13:2,12). Otherwise, the High Priest was so referred to: Lev 21:6-8; Exo 28:36,38 (WGos 31).

Luk 2:24

DOVES… PIGEONS: Jesus was poor. Surely, if at all possible, Joseph and Mary would have provided the very best sacrifice; not the poorest, since they knew what a unique child this was. They evidently had no choice. What does it really mean to be poor? Since God would not deny His Son anything really necessary, then it must be concluded that it was in his best interests to be materially poor. Therefore, material deprivation is not poverty at all, Scripturally speaking. As Jesus grew older there were many things he could do without, that “richer” children might take for granted. He could not, however, do without a loving family, where parents placed the Word of God first every day. Are our priorities for our children the same as God’s priorities for Jesus?

Luk 2:25

How often is waiting the lot of believers! How well do they wait? What do they wait for? Jacob had waited for the salvation of God (Gen 49:18), as had Isaiah (Isa 25:9). David had waited on the Lord, to see His goodness “in the land of the living” (Psa 27:13,14). The old man Simeon waited for the “consolation of Israel”.

SIMEON: Poss the son of Hillel (the founder of the school) and the father of Gamaliel (Paul’s teacher and “Rabban”): C&H 47; WGos 31.

THE CONSOLATION OF ISRAEL: Cp “redemption of Jerusalem” (v 38). Recalls the words which open the second major section of Isaiah’s prophecy, after the historical interlude of Isa 36-39: “Comfort, comfort my people… speak tenderly to Jerusalem, and proclaim to her that her hard service has been completed, that her sin has been paid for” (Isa 40:1,2). Thus opens the great Messianic section of Isaiah’s writings, where, setting his eye on the far horizon, he contemplates the suffering servant of Yahweh, a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief. Can we then imagine how Simeon had occupied his time as he waited, poring over the prophecies of Isaiah, studying that one book of Scripture practically his whole life, all for this one moment?

Perhaps the stories of the Bethlehem shepherds had put him in final readiness for this day, and now it had come. Led by the Spirit of God, the old patriarch was drawn to the temple (v 27). Can we imagine Joseph and Mary halting in their steps as Simeon approached them, in flowing robes, with white hair and fierce eyes, practically the reincarnation of Isaiah himself? He took the baby in his arms, with the dignity and tenderness of a grandfather. They stood at the end of one age and the beginning of another. In Simeon could be seen the lingering twilight of a day that had waxed old and would soon vanish. The old man with wrinkled brow typified the nation and the law, long past their years of glory, soon to be displaced.

In the babe in his arms could be seen the first light of dawn of a new day of glory, a glory that would never fade away. Everything that Simeon did and said here may be best understood within the framework of that most Messianic of the OT prophets, Isaiah. (Cp also Gen 49:18; Isa 25:9; Psa 27:13,14.)

Simeon was “waiting for the consolation of Israel”. Joseph of Arimathea was “waiting for the kingdom of God” (Luke 23:51). A little detail to which we can add John 12:42: “Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many believed.” A confirmation that there were many who realized that the time period of Daniel was fulfilled and that Messiah should come.

Simeon sees the salvation of the Lord in the temple on Mount Moriah, just as Abraham did (Gen 22), and as David did (2Sa 24:18). “So we have this temple, being assembled by Solomon. A place where so visibly God’s power and mercy had been seen. A place where God’s desire to repent of evil had been carried out before. A place where salvation could be had.

“Does this interesting set of links end there? No… because now we jump forward to the time when another son was born, but one that was oh so much more precious and special. The Lord, OUR Lord — Jesus Christ. The time came for him to be presented before the Lord, at His special place, the temple. The same place, the same location as Abraham, David and Solomon. What do we find? ‘Now there was a man in Jerusalem called Simeon, who was righteous and devout. He was waiting for the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit was upon him. It had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he would not die before he HAD SEEN THE LORD’S CHRIST. Moved by the Spirit, he went into the temple courts. When the parents brought in the child Jesus to do for him what the custom of the Law required, Simeon took him in his arms and praised God, saying: ‘Sovereign Lord, as you have promised, you now dismiss your servant in peace. FOR MY EYES HAVE SEEN YOUR SALVATION, which you have prepared in the sight of all people, a light for revelation to the Gentiles and for glory to your people Israel’ ” (Luk 2:25-32). Again, amazingly, at this place, we see a link to seeing the Salvation of God!

“This is what the Jews missed. They saw the stones, the ornamentation, the architecture, the beautiful temple. What they should have been seeing was God, and the salvation He provides. They concentrated on the temporary, and couldn’t see the eternal. How often do we do this?

“Do we see the stones, and miss the salvation? Do we see our brothers and sisters, with all their potential flaws… and even sometimes the great talents that all of us have in different areas… and miss the important thing… the salvation of God manifested in each and every one of us?

“Do we see the bread and the wine on a Sunday morning as a snack to tide over our hunger for lunch? A way to get rid of the annoying tickle we’ve had in our throats all morning? Or even just a chance to… feel better about ourselves?

“Or do we see the salvation of God?

“So Mount Moriah was all about reminding people that even though we get all caught up in temporary things, there are eternal things, an eternal hope, which we can see, and can draw hope from. It can be as solid a rock and foundation to us as the physical Mount Moriah is.

“Perhaps to us we should use the bread and the wine, the brothers and sisters around us, this place at this moment in time, as our own private Mount Moriah… a place of power and hope… a place to see through the veil of mortality to the plane of reality and immortality, where life isn’t distorted, and things can be seen clearly?” (MMc).

Luk 2:26

See Isa 61:1.

Luk 2:27

See Isa 6:1,3,5.

Luk 2:28

“The lingering twilight of declining day mingling with the dawn of a better morn” (Candlish, Gen 143).

Luk 2:29

See Gen 46:30; Isa 57:1,2.

Luk 2:30

See Isa 52:10; 62:1,11. “Spiritual life is not bound to the wheel of our natural life, even though it passes through phases of development. There is something of the eternal about the qualities of character produced in a godly man, qualities which remain fruitful whilst his faculties remain. Simeon in the temple nursing a babe of a few weeks is like life in the truth. Throughout our days we nurse spring within us, the vibrant promise of life to come, the undying hope which sustains our mortal spirit. Fullness of summer and the abundance of harvest are found in the satisfying plenitude of life in Christ. The threat of winter and of the cold sleep in the ground is warmed by a transforming hope, a confidence in the mercy of God, which turns death into a sleep in the Lord, and the long wait into but a moment; or, as another part of Scripture puts it, ‘or ever I was aware, my soul set me among the chariots of my princely people’ (Song 6:12)” (TMD 192,193) — “Before I realized it, my desire set me among the royal chariots of my people” (NIV).

Luk 2:31

See Isa 52:10.

Luk 2:32

See Isa 42:6; 49:6; 60:1,3.

Luk 2:34

See Isa 8:14,15/ Isa 26:19 / Isa 7:14; 8:18.

AND SAID TO MARY: Ignoring Joseph.

Luk 2:35

See Isa 53:5,7,8; 2Sa 23:7; Psa 22:16.

SO THAT THE THOUGHTS OF MANY HEARTS WILL BE REVEALED: That is, revealed to US!

A SWORD: Following the circumcision of the child 33 day before (a sword) and the offering of sacrifice here (another sword). A sword upon Christ in the cutting off of the flesh as a sacrifice. See also 2Sa 23:7; Psa 22:16; Mat 10:34.

A SWORD WILL PIERCE YOUR OWN SOUL TOO: “Finally, the story about her being pierced with the sword while Jesus hung dead on the cross, receiving the pain of the spear through her own heart as she stood beside her Son to the end and paralleled in Zec 12:10 where the Father Himself speaks, ‘They shall look on me whom they have pierced’, I find completely astonishing. The Father and the mother of Jesus stood there by his side as it were, suffering together in his agony, both of them with their hearts torn apart, the two-edged sword of the Word on the cross revealing the thoughts and intents of the hearts of man, woman and God, dividing asunder to the bone and the marrow, piercing to the soul and the spirit of them all. God consciously opened his heart and revealed his innermost feelings on that day, as did man unconsciously, and as did Mary in her confusion. And that is what the sacrifice of Christ does for all of us, it tears down the veils of our temples, it reveals all of us for what we are, and most importantly, it reveals God for who He really is on the inside, thus opening the way for our entry into the Holiest of all, to see into God’s own heart” (JP).

Luk 2:36

Sig of names: grace (Anna), face of God (Phanuel), blessed (Asher). See 2Co 4:6; Joh 1:14; Gen 32:30.

ASHER: See prophecy, Gen 49:20.

SEVEN YEARS AFTER HER MARRIAGE: Perhaps married at 15-18, widowed at 22-25… now aged 84, and a “temple virgin” (2Ch 36:19r).

Luk 2:37

SHE NEVER LEFT THE TEMPLE: Where she prob had a special apartment, as did Huldah (2Ch 34:22).

Luk 2:38

See Mal 3:16,17: “However dark the national picture we can always find a faithful remnant who fear the Lord, and wait for the tokens of His Hand. We read of them as the Old Dispensation closes amid the darkness and sorrow in which the just retribution of God had left them: ‘Then they that feared the Lord spake often one to another, and the Lord hearkened and heard it, and a book of remembrance was written before him for them that feared the Lord, and that thought upon his Name; and they shall be mine, saith the Lord of hosts, in that day when I make up my jewels.’ Four hundred years pass, years of conflict, heroism, and intrigue, and when the light of divine revelation shines once more on the Jewish scene, we find the remnant still there, Mary and Joseph, Zacharias and Elizabeth, Simeon and Anna, and others whose names are recorded in the Book of Life” (MP 19).

REDEMPTION OF JERUSALEM: Cp “consolation of Israel” (v 25). See Lesson, Redemption.

Luk 2:39

NAZARETH: Described in MP 23,24. Cp Mat 2:23.

Luk 2:40

AND THE CHILD GREW…: “The woman gave birth to a boy and named him Samson. He grew and the LORD blessed him” (Jdg 13:24).

HE WAS FILLED WITH WISDOM: “The Spirit of the LORD will rest on him– the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding, the Spirit of counsel and of power, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD” (Isa 11:2).

Luk 2:41

Vv 41-52: Jesus grew; he developed. This is not a picture of one who was God during his human days. It is normal human existence; His knowledge did not start complete and, even more significantly, he is wiser at 30 than he was at 12! His failure to realize that his parents would be worried when he stayed behind in Jerusalem, was the normal absent-mindedness of a 12-year-old totally absorbed in an activity, even though the activity showed perception of God, unusual for one of that age.

EVERY YEAR: Not binding on women (Exo 23:17), but Mary went “every year” anyway — even with a family of small children. Clear evidence of the devout character of this family.

Luk 2:42

Vv 42-52: See Lesson, Samuel, and Jesus in temple.

WHEN HE WAS TWELVE YEARS OLD: “Historians tells us that from post-Captivity days, and almost certainly in the time of Jesus, the bar mitzvah ceremony for Jewish boys was performed at the age of twelve, although it was later changed to thirteen (possibly because of a Jewish desire to break all association with the life of Jesus of Nazareth). If this is correct, it meant that Jesus went up to Jerusalem that year as a ‘son of the commandment’ and a full member of ‘the congregation of the Lord’. His subsequent behaviour would certainly indicate that this was the case” (AO).

Luk 2:43

“From my youth up” (Psa 88:15), the child Jesus was considering his role!

AFTER THE FEAST WAS OVER: Lit, “when they had fulfilled the days” (AV). “Passover is followed by seven days of unleavened bread, and since attendance during this period was voluntary, many pilgrims returned home immediately after the Passover sabbath. But not so the family of Jesus, they ‘fulfilled the days’.

We could learn a lot from the devotion of this family. They had their priorities right. The love and service of the Lord God came first in their lives. Too often we give our children mixed and confusing signals. Sometimes we attend the special study and fellowship occasions which form part of our ecclesial calendar, and sometimes we go where we want to go and do what we want to do instead. Subconsciously we convey the impression (although we would never admit this) that God is just one of the options which life has to offer, instead of an absolute necessity. And then we wonder why, in later years, our children do not take on the saving name of Jesus Christ or have no real enthusiasm for the things of the Truth. ‘Seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness’ was our Lord’s advice at the commencement of his ministry (Mat 6:33). It had always been a rule of family life, and he knew that it was right!” (AO).

BUT THEY WERE UNAWARE OF IT: “But he told neither his father nor his mother what he had done” (Jdg 14:6).

Luk 2:46

During this period, it was customary for rabbis to hold seminars in the Temple (WGos 42).

AFTER THREE DAYS: Some 30 years later, she found him again, 3 days after Passover!

Although this must have been a dreadful time for his parents, here we have a type of the death and resurrection to take place some years later. Jesus was gone for 3 days — possibly presumed dead. The joy of his resurrection can perhaps be better appreciated by our finite minds if we consider the joy of receiving back a child we thought was gone.

SITTING AMONG THE TEACHERS, LISTENING TO THEM AND ASKING THEM QUESTIONS: Among this group could have been Gamaliel the great teacher, Nicodemus, and/or Joseph of Arimathea.

AMONG THE TEACHERS: Jesus in the midst of: (1) thieves: Joh 19:18; (2) his disciples: Joh 20:19; (3) the teachers of the Law: Luk 2:46; (4) two or three: Mat 18:20; (5) the lampstands: Rev 1:13; (6) the throne: Rev 5:6.

QUESTIONS: Traditional passover question: ‘What do you mean by this service?’

“During the seven days of unleavened bread which followed the Passover, it was apparently customary for leading rabbis to hold seminars in the temple court, so that any who wished might take advantage of their instruction. Jesus was undoubtedly keen to make the most of such opportunities, for when his parents later came looking for him ‘they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them and asking them questions’.

“It is surely a mistake to imagine, as some have, that Jesus was arguing on level terms with these men of the Law, confounding and confuting them by his superior knowledge. Jesus knew that ‘iron sharpeneth iron’ (Pro 27:17) and that as a ‘son of the Law’ he must be about his Father’s business. He was preparing himself for the cut and thrust of debate that would follow in the years to come. As the prophet had said many centuries earlier, ‘the spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the Lord; and shall make him of quick understanding in the fear of the Lord’ (Isa 11:2,3). Its effect was already evident, for ‘all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and his answers’ (Luke 2:47)” (AO).

“One wonders where Jesus ate and slept during the three days he was separated from his parents. If he had gone to the home of some friend of the family, Joseph and Mary would surely have found him sooner. The most likely explanation is that some priest, delighted by his thirst for knowledge, or one of the learned rabbis, took him to his home in the city. It is interesting to consider that the elders with whom Jesus had discussions that week may have included Simeon or Gamaliel or Nicodemus or Joseph of Arimathea!” (AO).

Luk 2:47

EVERYONE WHO HEARD HIM WAS AMAZED AT HIS UNDERSTANDING AND HIS ANSWERS: “The Greek text seems to imply that not only did Jesus ask question after question, but also that many were thrown back at him for him to supply the answers. One enquiry would certainly have been prominent in those discussions. It was Passover time, and according to universal Jewish custom through many centuries, the firstborn of each family put the question at the Passover meal: ‘What mean ye by this service ?’ (Exo 12:26). Here was God’s firstborn, in His house, asking the same question.

“The answer which Scripture supplied was: ‘It is the SACRIFICE of the Lord’s passover, who passed over the houses of the children of Israel in Egypt’, the Lord ‘not suffering the destroyer to come into the houses’ covered by the blood of the lamb (Exo 12:23,27). With what mixed feelings was this young man now learning the fuller meaning behind that divine deliverance. Psa 88:15 has these poignant words: ‘I am afflicted and ready to die from my youth up.’ The cross was already beginning to cast its shadow across his path” (AO).

Luk 2:48

SON, WHY HAVE YOU TREATED US LIKE THIS?: Motherly anxiety drove Mary to interrupt these learned teachers. There is reproach in the words, but perhaps also a pardonable pride: ‘This is my boy with whom you elders find it worthwhile to discuss Scripture!’

“Your father” ct with “my Father” (v 49)!

ANXIOUSLY: The sw describes the “torments” suffered by the rich man in Hades in the parable in Luke 16:23-25.

Luk 2:49

IN MY FATHER’S HOUSE: Or, ‘about my Father’s business” (KJV). Lit, “in the things which are my Father’s…” The first recorded words of Jesus, crystallizing the purpose of his life (cp last words: “It is finished”: Joh 19:30).

“And all the members of Christ’s greater family still need to learn that lesson: if they would find Messiah they can do no better than look for him in the symbolism of the Temple and the Passover and in all the wisdom contained in the law of Moses, the prophets, and the psalms” (AO).

Alongside this, consider the passages in the Psalms expressing the cherished desire to dwell in the house of God: Psa 27:4; 48:1-3,12,13; 63:1-3; 84:1-4; 122:1-4,6,7.

“We must be driven and obsessed and extreme and fanatic — but the driving motive power must be love of God and of Christ and of the Brotherhood and of mankind, and the purpose must be study and self-suppression and service. Most people are ciphers, zeros — dead and dull and drifting in small selfishness and shallow satisfactions. This can be the case ‘in the Truth’ as well as out of it: it is the natural way, and very pervasive. It is a refreshing relief to see a man driven by a purpose beyond himself, though all purposes but one are perversions of man’s true purpose, and lead only to a common grave with the most purposeless of men. It was said of Christ that ‘he is mad… that he hath a devil… he is beside himself’… ‘The zeal of Thine House hath eaten me up.’ He is our example. His singleminded intensity was beyond the comprehension of the careless, common crowd” (GVG).

Luk 2:51

THEN HE WENT DOWN TO NAZARETH WITH THEM: The first phase of “his Father’s business” led him back to his mother’s home and Joseph’s workshop for 18 years (cp Psa 40:7,8). Character can be developed to perfect satisfaction in the most mundane of settings and circumstances!

“Understanding that things are to be done in God’s time table and not ours is such a hard lesson. Christ at a young age was willing to accept that it was not time for him, even though he knew that there were many young men in scriptures who began their work at a young age. We too get frustrated when we think the time for something is right now and we meet obstacles. I find that God is in such control, that when I head a certain direction and the doors open easily, I am aware that this is right for today. I am also aware that many times my plans are not happening as I anticipated or wanted. When I push them forward anyway, I usually find grief. When I let go and let God take control, I find a larger lesson or blessing that I ever anticipated. God is graciously caring for us… let us listen and learn the better way” (CPv).

AND WAS OBEDIENT TO THEM: The Lord Jesus, as he grew up, was “subject” to Joseph and Mary, so that whatever they asked of Jesus did not require him to transgress any divine commandment. What a wonderful guardianship was selected for the development of the Lord Jesus.

“Nevertheless, until the call came, Jesus was content to be subject to Joseph and Mary in Nazareth, even though he was now a ‘son of the Law’ with more understanding than his parents. He knew that the fifth commandment was as much an obligation as all the others: ‘Honour thy father and thy mother… that it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth’ (Eph 6:2,3). Never, it may be assumed, was this commandment so fully and so conscientiously observed as during these early years in the life of our Lord; certainly, none deserves so much as he to ‘live long on the earth’, and in due course he will!” (AO).

BUT HIS MOTHER TREASURED ALL THESE THINGS IN HER HEART: “The words Luke uses to describe her respectful fervour are an echo of the words used of Jacob’s concern for Joseph and his momentous dreams in Gen 37:11” (AO).

Luk 2:52

Cit 1Sa 2:26 (cp Pro 3:4): Jesus’ spiritual development is consciously patterned upon the spiritual development of the young child Samuel. He was not a second person of a “Trinity”; he was not a Divine Being masquerading as a baby or a little boy — he WAS a child, growing up in the same way, and learning his lessons from the Scriptures and from daily life, as would any other child. He was one of us.

Boys of the hills grow larger views. For are the hills not high? And does not climbing exercise The will of those who try?

The highest peak is first to see The glory of the dawn, And that same peak can see the sun When others think ’tis gone.

Up to the hills he lifts his eyes; From whence shall come his aid? His safety cometh from the Lord, Who heaven and earth hath made.

And thus the little Son of God, In Galilee’s green hills, Soon learned to trust God’s staff and rod To keep him from all ills.

O Nazareth, thy very streets Should shout aloud for joy, For they did feel the happy feet Of God’s own little boy.

(WB Tunstall).

“Amid the wonder and solitude of his Father’s creation, knowledge was transformed by that strange alchemy into wisdom, and prayer turned to communion… In despised Galilee, far from the glittering opulence of the Roman court, far from the rabbinical schools of Jewish learning, Jesus grew up as a tender plant and as a root out of a dry ground, preparing himself, and being prepared by his Father, for his manifestation, first to Israel, and then to all mankind” (MP 27).

Luke 3

Luk 3:1

Vv 1,2: In two verses only, Luke presents the great parade — of all the powerful and wealthy and prominent men of the world in his day. There they stand on the world’s “stage” for all to respect and admire! But God — being no respecter of persons, and desiring that no flesh should glory in His presence — now absolutely sets all the mighty to one side, passing them by entirely, and condescends to speak to a man of the wilderness — a man of simple food and simple clothes and simple habits. The Creator of heaven and earth has no need for lavish palaces or fine temples; instead, He chooses to dwell with shepherds in the fields (Luke 2:8-14), and a “wild man” on the river bank!

Herod the Great’s old kingdom is now divided into 4 parts, only 2 of which his sons rule. (People governed by such men were surely ready to hear the gospel.)

HEROD: Herod Antipas — “the fox” — brother of Archelaus, and son of Herod the Great.

ITUREA: 1Ch 1:31: Edomite origin of name.

Luk 3:2

ANNAS AND CAIAPHAS: Annas was officially High Priest from 6 to 15 AD. Annas had 5 sons and a son-in-law (Caiaphas) who become High Priests. When arrested, Christ was taken first to Annas, the head of the family (John 18:13).

THE WORD OF GOD CAME: A formal expression (cp Jer 1:2), placing John in the true prophetic tradition.

Luk 3:3

THE JORDAN: Elijah was last seen here (2Ki 2:8). John Bapt was first seen here.

PREACHING: First principles in John’s preaching: See Lesson, John the Baptist, gospel of. Elijah was last seen at the river Jordan (2Ki 2:11); John the Baptist first appeared to Israel at the same place (v 6).

Luk 3:4

DESERT: A “wilderness”, both natural and spiritual.

PREPARE THE WAY FOR THE LORD: How? By preaching (v 3), and by being taken out of the way (Mat 4:12).

LORD: “Yahweh” of Isa 40:3 becomes “Kyrios” here.

Luk 3:6

ALL: Limited sense of “all”: “all flesh” (Gen 6:12; Isa 66:24; Jer 45:5; Eze 20:48; 21:4); “all people” (Est 3:14; Lam 1:8; 1Ki 8:43; Dan 5:19; Mic 4:5). Christ has power over “all flesh” (Joh 17:2).

Luk 3:7

YOU BROOD OF VIPERS: Three and a half years later they have not been touched by the teaching of Jesus — for he calls them “serpents” and “vipers” again (Mat 23:33). Hopefully the words of Jesus have a bigger impact on us!

WHO WARNED YOU TO FLEE FROM THE COMING WRATH?: A wildfire driving all snakes and crawling creatures before it (Hist Geog 64).

Luk 3:8

FRUITS IN KEEPING WITH REPENTANCE: That is, works to demonstrate faith (Gal 5:22,23), esp the work of confession and forsaking sin (1Jo 1:9; Joh 8:11).

STONES… CHILDREN: In Heb, abanim/banim.

THESE STONES: The stones of Jos 4 were 12 great stones placed in river, and 12 more stones taken from river. Sym baptism to new life. (In Heb and Aramaic, the words for “stones” and “children” are almost identical.) Joshua’s great memorial of God’s deliverance — as are all “stones/children” of God!

Luk 3:9

THE AX… AT THE ROOT OF THE TREES: Marking them out for future destruction. Ax = the word of God, brought in the preaching of John — by which the status of every “tree” was made evident.

Luk 3:11

One wonders how much we have the desire to adhere to this type of teaching in our present materialistic age. Most of us are so used to having more than we need, and yet half the world goes hungry and unclothed. It seems that there is something wrong here (Isa 58:7-11; Luke 18:22).

Luk 3:12

Luke’s interest in tax-collectors: Luk 3:12; 5:27; 7:29; 15:1; 18:10; 19:2.

Luk 3:14

SOLDIERS: Prob military irregulars, like followers of Barabbas. Thus “wages” = pay for regular, non-military jobs.

EXTORT: Suggesting political revolutionists (WGos 60).

Luk 3:15

“Wondering” is not the same as being prepared!

Luk 3:16

First water, then spirit. First natural, then spiritual. First cleansing, then forgiveness. First purifying, then raising to new life. (Note “fire” of judgment is omitted.)

Luk 3:17

WINNOWING FORK: The winnowing fork (RSV): a fan or shovel, used by Syrians (ISBE): cp Isa 30:24; Jer 15:7.

HIS THRESHING FLOOR: The Temple of Solomon was built on a threshing floor: 2Ki 24:16,24.

Winnowing = judgment in Mat 3:12n; Dan 2:35; Isa 5:24; 41:15,16; Mal 3:2,3; Jer 23:28,29.

Luk 3:19

Vv 19,20: John had said that he would decrease (Joh 3:30), but he probably did not think it would be a consequence of his being imprisoned. It is good that we do not know the details of the future.

Luk 3:20

HE LOCKED JOHN UP IN PRISON: “From a certain point of view, it is saddening to think of such a man as John the Baptist in the hands of such creatures as Herod and his paramour; and sadder to think that his life should be sacrificed to the feminine malice created by John’s upright attitude as a preacher of righteousness. But the sadness is only for a moment. It is the lot of divine things and divine men to be under the heel of wickedness in the day of sin’s ascendancy. We can comfort ourselves with the thought that they do not come under the heel by chance, or before the appointed time. It is part of the process by which they are prepared for, and ultimately introduced to ‘an eternal weight of glory’. And there is the further consolation that to the victims of the oppression, the triumph of the enemy is ‘but for a moment’. Death is the best thing that can happen to them. Their trials and distresses are annihilated at a stroke: and in a moment, they are face to face with the glory for which their distresses prepare them, for the simple reason that in death there is no knowledge of time, and therefore no conscious interval to the resurrection” (NR 25,26).

Luk 3:21

Why was Jesus baptized (Mat 3:13-17; Mar 1:8-11; Luk 3:21-23)? The most obvious answer is the Scriptural one: in the words of Jesus himself, “to fulfill all righteousness”. This calls to mind Mat 5:17: “I am not come to destroy [the law], but to fulfill.” The work of Jesus, in all its aspects, was to fulfill, or complete, the righteousness of the law of Moses. The law of Moses was a “shadow” (Heb 10:1), pointing forward to the substance, the reality, which was Jesus. As Moses washed Aaron (Exo 30:20,21; 40:12), to sanctify and cleanse him for his mediatorial work, so John washed Jesus. If Aaron had entered the Most Holy without washing, he would have failed; if Jesus had offered himself as a sacrifice with no public baptism (signifying the denial of the flesh), he would likewise have failed. Jesus was absolutely without personal sin. The necessity of his baptism shows how far even sinful flesh alone separates man from God.

Vv 21,22: The anointing of the King. Apparently, the only meeting between John and Jesus. “He had no life of sin to leave behind in the waters of Jordan, but there he did bring to an end the home life of Nazareth, the quiet, peaceful years of preparation, and did accept as the ‘righteous will of God’ the storm and strain and sacrifice of the work which he had come to do” (Erdman, Mat 36).

See Mat 3:13-17n. Reason for Christ’s baptism: found in genealogy, tracing his ancestry back to Adam (v 38). His baptism: a public identification with those he came to save. Cp Christ’s baptism with anointings of David (1Sa 16:13) and Aaron (Lev 8:12).

Luk 3:22

This Holy Spirit led him into the wilderness: cp Luk 4:1 with Rom 8:14.

THE HOLY SPIRIT DESCENDED: The Spirit “brooding” on the surface of the waters (Gen 1:2). “The beginning of the new creation!”

DOVE: Only sacrificial animal to be feathered (Luk 2:24; Lev 1:14,15; 5:7). The dove, with keen eyesight, returned to the safety of Noah’s ark, in peace, bringing an olive branch of new creation. The dove is gentle (Mat 10:16), clean (Song 6:9), particular in its choice of food (Gen 8), swift (Psa 55:6), beautiful (Psa 68:13), constant in love (Song 5:12).

A VOICE CAME FROM HEAVEN: Sounding, perhaps, like thunder to the bystanders (Joh 12:29). Understood only by Jesus and John. The voice from heaven identifies Jesus as the “prophet like unto Moses” (Deu 18:15-19).

WITH YOU I AM WELL PLEASED: “On whom my pleasure rests.” Cp Isa 42:1: “From this day on Jesus walked in the shadow of the cross” (WGos 66).

Luk 3:23

See Lesson, Luke’s genealogy. Also see Article, Genealogies of Jesus.

The phrase “so it was thought” again indicates that direct parenthood is out of the question. Luke, as well as Matthew, clearly explains why elsewhere (Luk 1:35); so there is no need to suppose that Jesus was lit the son of Joseph. The next phrase however, “the son of Heli”, presents the problem. To take this phrase in the most easily understood sense would mean that Joseph’s natural father had two names: Jacob (Mat 1:16) and Heli (Luk 3:23). This is not necessarily impossible in itself, but further reading compounds the problem since Jacob’s immediate ancestors were Matthan, Eleazar, and Eliud, while Heli’s were Matthat, Levi, and Melchi. Clearly we are dealing, then, with two separate men and two separate lines.

Two possibilities exist to reconcile the difficulty: (1) Luk 3:23 could be read: “And Jesus (being, so it was thought, the son of Joseph) was actually the ‘son’ (ie grandson) of Heli.” Under this alternative, “the son of Heli” would refer further back, to Jesus, and not to Joseph. Heli then would be the father of Mary. (2) “Joseph, the son-in-law of Heli.” Again, Heli would be the father of Mary, and the genealogy of Luke would be Mary’s genealogy, through her father. Joseph’s inclusion at that point is easily explained in that the woman’s identity is often submerged in that of her husband.

Since both Joseph and Mary were David’s descendants their two lines coincide from Abraham to David. Thereafter they diverge, Joseph’s continuing with the kingly line of Solomon and Rehoboam, and Mary’s proceeding from David’s son Nathan. The two lines appear to join briefly with Shealtiel and Zerubbabel (Mat 1:12; Luk 3:27). If, however, these two are the same in both records, then one of Shealtiel’s “fathers” — either Jechoniah (Mat 1:12) or Neri (Luk 3:27) — must have been his adoptive and not his literal father.

BEGAN: Cp Gen 1:1; Joh 1:1; etc: “in the beginning”.

SO IT WAS THOUGHT: May mean “as was reckoned by law”.

Luk 3:24

MATTHAT: Same as Matthan (Mat 1:15)

Luk 3:27

SHEALTIEL, THE SON OF NERI: The two lines (Joseph’s in Mat and Mary’s in Luk) converge in 2 successive generations (Shealtiel and Zerubbabel). Was Jeconiah the father of Shealtiel (Mat 1:12), or was Neri the father (here)? One of the two lines (in Mat and Luk) was prob perpetuated through an adoption. Either way, legally and by blood, Jesus was descended from David.

Luk 3:31

SON OF DAVID: Jesus so called in Mat 1:1; 9:27; 12:23; 15:22; 20:30; 21:9-11.

Luk 3:36

CAINAN: This name does not occur in Heb OT genealogy, but is picked up from LXX.

Luk 3:38

SON OF ADAM: Jesus as son of Adam in Rom 5:12-21; 1Co 15:22,45. This leads into Luk 4, where the wilderness temptation compares to Adam’s Edenic temptation.

SON OF GOD: Every phrase in this genealogy refers back to Christ: Jesus was the “son of Adam”, and Jesus (not Adam) was the “son of God”.

Mark 14

Mar 14:1

The rejection of Jesus begins with the leaders of Israel… but ends with the betrayal by his own disciples (Mar 14:18…).

Mar 14:2

BUT NOT DURING THE FEAST: Irony: when they tried to kill him, they failed; when they resolved not to do so, they were forced into it!

Mar 14:3

See Lesson, Mary, “three women”.

SHE BROKE THE JAR: Five broken things in the Bible and the results achieved by them: (1) broken pitchers (Jdg 7:18-20), causing the light to shine forth; (2) a broken jar (Mark 14:3), causing the ointment to be poured out; (3) broken bread (Mat 14:20), causing the hungry to be fed; (4) a broken body (1Co 11:24), causing the world to be saved; and (5) a broken will (Psa 51:17), leading the sinner back to God.

Mar 14:4

SOME OF THOSE PRESENT: Including Judas (Joh 12n).

Mar 14:8

SHE DID WHAT SHE COULD: “The limited objective”.

POURED: “Murizo” (from “myrrh”). It was, in fact, the only true anointing, except for the dry spices later used.

FOR MY BURIAL: Cp Joh 12:7. It was also an anointing in anticipation of his resurrection (Psa 45:6-8,11).

Mar 14:11

A handful of coins was enough to settle forever the conflict between good and evil. For what price do we sell the Kingdom?

PROMISED TO GIVE HIM MONEY: The 30 pieces of silver (Mat 26:15; Luk 22:5) was a mere “down payment” — perhaps 10%? (WGos 629).

Mar 14:13

Very precisely arranged beforehand, and undertaken secretly. To have named a precise house ahead of time would have played into the hands of the betrayer, inviting an interruption at the proposed meal.

TWO OF HIS DISCIPLES: Peter and John (Luk 22:8).

A MAN CARRYING A JAR OF WATER: An unusual sight in the East (HVM 150). Carrying water was woman’s work (Joh 4:7,28; Gen 24:11). Was this man Mark, going to his mother’s house?

WATER: Which may have been used by Jesus to wash the disciples’ feet.

Mar 14:14

THE HOUSE: They would be meeting in a private house, not a synagogue.

GUEST ROOM: “Kataluma”: sw “inn” (Luk 2:7).

Mar 14:15

“I go to prepare a place”: John 14:1-6.

FURNISHED: Lit “strewn” — ie with pillows and cushions.

Mar 14:18

ONE WHO IS EATING WITH ME: Cp v 20. “Even my close friend, whom I trusted, he who shared my bread, has lifted up his heel against me” (Psa 41:9). Cp also Psa 55:12-14. Note: Jesus broke bread with Judas! Cp Joh 13:26.

Mar 14:19

There is no hint that any of the disciples suspected Judas. “An indication of how completely the traitor lived his own life in his own world even while continuing to be an intimate member of the apostles’ band.”

SURELY NOT I?: “A man ought to examine himself before he eats of the bread and drinks of the cup” (1Co 11:28).

Mar 14:20

ONE WHO DIPS BREAD… WITH ME: Cp Mar 14:18. “Even my close friend, whom I trusted, he who shared my bread, has lifted up his heel against me” (Psa 41:9).

Mar 14:25

I WILL NOT DRINK… OF THE… VINE: A priest officiating in holy place must abstain from wine (Lev 10:9).

Mar 14:26

A HYMN: By tradition at Passover, this was Psa 113; 114 at beginning, and Psa 115-118 at end.

Mar 14:27

A continuation of the same figure: Christ is still a shepherd, leading his flock.

Mar 14:28

AHEAD OF YOU INTO GALILEE: “Unto the mountain where Jesus had appointed them” (Mat 28:16).

Mar 14:31

Cp Peter’s boasts to the empty bluster of the rooster (Mar 14:68).

Peter thinks he will lay down (sw Joh 10:11,15) his life for Jesus. Instead, Jesus will lay down his life for Peter. A great irony: cp David/God/build house: 2Sa 7.

Mar 14:32

Jesus had previously baffled Judas (ie Mar 14:12n). But now he places himself in the betrayer’s hands — by retiring to a familiar spot.

GETHSEMANE: Lit “a wine press for oil”. Poss its olive trees provided oil for the anointing of priests and kings.

Mar 14:33

Some disciples are closer to their Lord than others. “Members one of another.”

JAMES AND JOHN: The two who promised to drink of his cup.

DISTRESSED AND TROUBLED: The mark of a man, not a god! A sign of weakness, trial, but also of compassion and sympathy (Heb 4:15,16; 5:2,7,8).

Mar 14:34

STAY HERE AND KEEP WATCH: Were his disciples already failing him?

Mar 14:35

THE HOUR MIGHT PASS: Perhaps the travails of mind that assailed him in that hour.

GOING A LITTLE FARTHER: He separates himself even from the closest three: seeking the utmost privacy to communicate with his Father. Cp picture of tabernacle/temple: Jesus // Most holy; the 3 // Holy place; the other 8 // outer court; and Judas and crowd // world outside!

THE HOUR: Called “this cup” in next v; Mat 26:39; Luk 22:42. The hours of waiting, or the cross itself? If the cross itself, he would realize quickly that this could not be avoided — thus “not as I will…”

Mar 14:36

Was this prayer heard by Mark (vv 51,52)?

ABBA: Aram “father”. Esp a name by which God was addressed in prayer. Only 3 times in NT text: Mar 14:36; Rom 8:15; Gal 4:6. But this Aramaic term may lie behind numerous refs to God as Father where only the Gr “Pater” is given in the NT.

Mark frequently uses Aramaic expressions: Boanerges (Mar 3:17), Talitha koum (Mar 5:41), Korban (Mar 7:11), Ephphatha (Mar 7:34), Rabbi (Mar 9:5; 11:21; 14:45), Bartimaeus (Mar 10:46), Abba (Mar 14:36), Golgotha (Mar 15:22), Eloi (Mar 15:34).

TAKE THIS CUP FROM ME: Perhaps the worst suffering, which Christ prays to be spared, is the separation from his Father’s presence (Psa 22:1,11; 69:17). But this suffering was, in fact, not spared (Mar 15:34). Also, see Mat 26:39.

NOT WHAT I WILL: Proof that Christ has a will of his own, although he manages not to exercise it here.

“At every step in that last week at Jerusalem we see Jesus master of the situation and not its victim, controlling events even when men think they have him in their power, making the hour for preparation for the disciples and himself, choosing the time for his rendezvous with his enemies. Master at every moment, shall we say, but one — the mystery of the agony in the garden of the Olive Press when he prays that the cup may pass, yet submits his own will to his Father’s. During this week and up to his breathing out his life upon the Cross he more completely than ever lives out the things that were written. Thus it must be — the Son of Man must suffer. Yet he is not merely acting a preordained role; he is meeting his enemies with all the power of his mind and the depth of his own knowledge of ‘the scriptures, and the power of God’. It is they who are fulfilling the prophecy; he knows the course it will take, and he lives it through as the Lamb of God, but he grieves as he sees them going in all assurance the way to their own forewritten doom, judging themselves while they think they are judging him” (SMk 212).

Mar 14:37

See Lesson, Watching for an hour.

Why did they fall asleep? (1) Long days of activity preceding Passover; (2) wine at dinner; (3) lateness of hour; (4) long wait in dark garden.

Mar 14:41

He sits with the sleeping disciples, as a shepherd keeping watch over his flock, quietly awaiting the coming of the band of men to arrest him. (Suggestion: a long period, an hour or two, while they sleep… before “Look!” During the last part of this waiting, Jesus would see the approach of the arresting party, a good way off: (a) they came late at night, (b) with torches, (c) descending into valley from city, (d) climbing mountain on opposite side, toward the garden.

THE THIRD TIME: Both James and John fail Jesus 3 times, just like Peter.

Mar 14:42

RISE! LET US GO!: Not only does he await his persecutors and murderers, but he rises to go and meet them!

HERE COMES MY BETRAYER!: Christ could see the approach of the party to arrest him: they came late at night, carrying torches, traversing the Kidron Valley and climbing the mountain. (If Christ had not awakened the disciples, they might never have seen him go.)

Mar 14:43

SWORDS: Regular weapons of Roman soldiers.

CLUBS: Regular weapons of Jewish temple guards.

Mar 14:44

Why was it necessary that the Son of Man be betrayed with a kiss? There is, of course, the obvious symbolism: the deceitful treachery of a familiar friend. But, on close examination, there would appear to be a practical reason for Judas to suggest a kiss: the time set for Jesus’ arrest was night, and the place a rather secluded garden. The Jews bent on taking Jesus have realized that, in the confusion of an arrest, he could slip out of their hands quite easily. The trick would be to single him out from his followers while they were still at some distance, so that the soldiers would know which of the shadowy figures to pursue and lay hands on. (Under normal visibility there would have been no problem identifying Jesus.) And thus the stratagem of having Judas precede the multitude, for only a member of the inner circle (so they would suppose) could get close enough to single out the leader from his followers.

Mar 14:45

Mark’s last mention of Judas.

RABBI: Mark frequently uses Aramaic expressions: Boanerges (Mar 3:17), Talitha koum (Mar 5:41), Korban (Mar 7:11), Ephphatha (Mar 7:34), Rabbi (Mar 9:5; 11:21; 14:45), Bartimaeus (Mar 10:46), Abba (Mar 14:36), Golgotha (Mar 15:22), Eloi (Mar 15:34).

KISSED: “Kataphileo”. Lit, he “kissed him much, or effusively”.

Mar 14:47

ONE OF THOSE STANDING NEAR: Peter (Joh 18:10). Was he aiming for Judas (cp Joh 13:24), but only managed to wound a bystander?

THE SERVANT OF THE HIGH PRIEST: Malchus (Joh 18:10).

CUTTING OFF HIS EAR: See the contrast: some (like Jesus) wait, watch, pray, prepare, weigh alternatives, and (only then) act. Others (like Peter) doze off, sleep, wake suddenly, and then “cut off an ear”. (Jesus heals the ear: Luk 22:51.)

Mar 14:50

Darkness closes down upon the scene. The garden, with its gnarled old olive trees, is dark and quiet again. The silence is broken only by the rustling of the leaves.

Mar 14:51

A YOUNG MAN: John Mark? Mark’s nickname in later years was “Kolobodaktulos” = “stump-fingered” (WGos 732). Reasons for this theory: (a) the upper room was (perhaps) at John Mark’s mother’s house (Act 12:12), (b) after Jesus and eleven leave, Mark goes to bed, (c) later comes a knock on door: Judas and band looking for Jesus; they go away, (d) Mark jumps up quickly, throws on a cloak (sheet), and races out to Gethsemane by another way, hoping to outrace Judas and the soldiers, (e) but he arrives at the scene too late, and is almost apprehended himself, but manages to flee away naked.

Mar 14:52

NAKED: An echo of Amo 2:16?

LEAVING HIS GARMENT BEHIND: As the resurrected Christ left his grave clothes, the symbols of his death, behind in the tomb…

Mar 14:53

Annas was no longer the official High Priest, but the title (and power and wealth) remained in family: 5 different sons, and finally his son-in-law Caiaphas became High Priest (from 18 to 36 AD: OP 23:262). They were a ruthless and ambitious family, who would do almost anything to maintain power (MP 332).

Two injustices here: (1) a private meeting, and (2) late at night. A night trial was illegal: Act 4:3; 5:17-19.

Mar 14:54

AT A DISTANCE: Luk 23:49.

THE FIRE: Peter warmed himself by the fire of the world, but denied the living fire (cp Isa 50:11, in context of judgment — vv 8,9 — and smiting — v 11).

Mar 14:55

WERE LOOKING FOR EVIDENCE AGAINST JESUS: To fulfill Psa 27:12; 35:11.

Mar 14:56

The false witnesses brought against Jesus are suggested by Psa 27:12; 35:11,12,19; 64:8. (Note: why were the witnesses confused and contradictory of one another? Because, when the key witness — Judas — defected, the whole prosecution strategy fell apart! In the hasty scramble to find and “coach” new witnesses, confusion resulted, and was easily brought out — probably by cross-examination by someone like Nicodemus or Joseph of Arimathea.)

MANY TESTIFIED FALSELY AGAINST HIM: The false witnesses, by law, were liable to the same punishment they sought to inflict on another (Deu 19:15-21). Cp trial of Naboth (1Ki 21:1-19).

Mar 14:57

Notice that the Sanhedrin and chief priests felt some necessity to maintain scruples of Mosaic Law. Poss they knew that a complete fraud would be rejected by others.

Mar 14:58

This (an obvious misapplication) was the best they could do! But, ironically, the death of Jesus would also mark the “end” of the Temple!

IN THREE DAYS: Always ref resurrection (cp Mar 8:31; 9:31; 10:33).

ANOTHER, NOT MADE BY MAN: An obvious misapplication: In effect Christ says, “Destroy me, and in 3 days I will rise again.” Jesus himself = temple (Joh 1:14; 2:19-21; Mat 12:6).

NOT MADE BY MAN: “Without hands” (AV): Dan 2:34; ct Act 7:48; cp Heb 9:11.

Mar 14:60

THE HIGH PRIEST: Now Caiaphas (cp Psa 109:2-4).

Mar 14:61

BUT JESUS REMAINED SILENT: “They have spoken against me with a lying tongue… but I give myself unto prayer” (Psa 109:2,4). Cp 1Pe 2:23. Jesus’ silence is more eloquent than any words!

“What was the single most amazing thing that Jesus did? Was it the overcoming of the tempter in the wilderness? Was it acts of healing? Of raising the dead to life? Was it even hanging on the cross?

“I submit that the single most amazing thing that our Lord did, was to be silent.

“Jesus was on trial. He was set upon by a band of none-too-gentle soldiers, under orders to whisk him away to a night-time court. False witnesses accused him. Malicious council members conspired against him. Falsely pious leaders plotted with evil intent against him. And all the while, Jesus knew that he was right, and they were wrong.

“Before them was a loved Son. The accused was the only one who was truly blameless. The only one who really cared in his heart for the nation that these brutish elders thought they were saving from the Romans. Before them was someone who had only and always given of himself for others. The only one who had the power to truly do good. The only one who had the power to throw off the true yoke. Jesus was silent.

“Jesus was not powerless. He could have confuted the lies. He could have shouted down the insinuations as well as the blunt accusations. He could have put them in their place. He could have annihilated their arguments. He could have used his power to hurt them, or destroy them, and escape. He was right, and they were all wrong. Jesus was silent.

“How do we react, I wonder, to words spoken against us? Do we consider that they may be justified? Most times they probably are, and we are blind to our own failings.

“More often, perhaps, we are blinded by our sense of justice. We are quick to excuse ourselves, and even quicker to attack supposed injustice against ourselves. We may lash out most often against those closest to us. When we are tempted to react in such a way, let us think on the mind of Christ. “Let this mind be in you…” (Mike Bull).

AND GAVE NO ANSWER: As if to say, ‘The prosecution has not made its case.’

AGAIN THE HIGH PRIEST ASKED HIM: Adding, “I adjure thee, by living God” (Mat 26:63) — the oath of Mishna, called also the “oath of the testimony”, binding the defendant to answer (Lev 5:1).

Mar 14:62

I AM: A definite, non-evasive answer. Cp Mat 26:64n.

AND YOU WILL SEE…: Psa 110:1! In the great Day to come, Jesus tells them, our roles will be reversed: I will be the Judge, and YOU will be the JUDGED! They were in the role of judges (for a moment), but (one day, and forever after) he will be the only true judge!

Mar 14:63

THE HIGH PRIEST TORE HIS CLOTHES: The prescribed method for dissociating oneself from blasphemy (SMk 193). But illegal for a High Priest (Lev 21:10), prejudicial as a judge, and symbolizing, unknowingly, the end of his own priesthood (cp Isa 50:9). (High Priest’s garment and veil of temple, of same material: cp Mar 15:38.)

Cp 2Ki 11:14. “Athaliah tore her robes, and called out, ‘Treason! Treason!” — pronouncing her own sentence!

Mar 14:64

YOU HAVE HEARD THE BLASPHEMY: Not a blasphemy against God or Jewish Law, but against Caesar: “We have no king but Caesar” (Joh 19:12,15). Caiaphas was looking for something specifically to arouse the Roman authorities, and in Jesus’ intimation of future kingship he thinks he may have found it.

Mar 14:65

Cp Isa 50:6. A complete loss of all judicial restraint and dignity. Even Sanhedrin members participate (cp Psa 22:16: the whole assembly).

PROPHESY: He was blindfolded (Luk 22:64). ‘Tell us who is striking you.’ One day he will!

Mar 14:66

The only instance in the Gospels where a woman is not on Jesus’ side! Or is she?

IN THE COURTYARD: Under the principal apartments of high priest’s palace (built on slope of a hill) was a lower story with a porch in front (Temple 34).

Mar 14:67

Peter is also recognized by at least one man: Joh 18:26.

Was Peter afraid especially because of his violent action against the High Priest’s servant? Cp John 18:26.

Mar 14:72

Jesus also turned and looked at him (Luk 22:61).

BROKE DOWN: Epiballo = to throw down upon. (AV “when he thought thereon” misses the point.) Godet translates: “hurrying forth”. There is support in the papyri for reading it: “he burst into tears”. Souter: “he set to and wept” (and kept on weeping).

Mark 10

Mar 10:1

Vv 1-12: We are living in a society where these verses — about the indissolubility of marriage — are made a total mockery. Here is an area where the laws and attitudes of society are at variance with God. Our young people growing up today have an ever-increasing problem trying to match the beliefs that they know to be correct with the attractive views of society. Perhaps it helps to remember what God wanted us to learn from this situation. It was an institution of great antiquity, going right back to Adam and Eve (v 6); it is ordained of God, and underwritten by Him (v 9). It is part of a picture which is very much part of the most intimate aspects of our lives now — to point forward to the relationship which Christ has with his bride: Eph 5:25-33.

THAT PLACE: That is, Galilee (Mat 19:1). Was this his last look at his boyhood home?

CROWDS OF PEOPLE CAME TO HIM: “Large” crowds (Mat 19:2). Organized pilgrimages?

Mar 10:2

TO TEST HIM: To catch him at his words: Mar 12:14,19; Joh 8:5,6; Mar 2:24.

Mar 10:4

No command (v 3), but merely a permission (v 4)!

Mar 10:5

YOUR HEARTS WERE HARD: Hard-heartedness is first seen in Pharaoh (Exo 4:21; 7:3,13; 8:15,32; 9:12,34; 10:1,20,27; 11:10; 14:4,8). So when this description is used of anyone in Israel, it is very pointed: ‘You are being like the oppressing Egyptians from whom I have delivered you!’ Cp Deu 15:7; 2Ch 36:13; Psa 95:8; Isa 63:17; Mark 10:5; 16:14; John 12:40; Rom 2:5.

Mar 10:6

Quotes from Gen 1:27 (here) and Gen 2:24 (Mar 10:8): thus Jesus endorses what are considered — by some — to be two different “accounts” of creation.

MALE AND FEMALE: Lit, A male and A female, ie one of each!

Mar 10:8

See Lesson, Divorce.

Mar 10:13

// Gen 48:14.

See Lesson, Laying on of hands.

WERE BRINGING: “Prosphero” = to offer, as a sacrifice! Just previously (Mat 19:1-12; Mar 10:1-12), Jesus was talking about the sanctity of marriage; the children are a large part of his reason.

TO HAVE HIM TOUCH THEM: All the occasions of Jesus touching, or being touched, in the context of healing (notice that not one of them is in John’s gospel): Mat 8:3,15; 9:20,21,29; 14:36; 17:7; 20:34; Mark 1:41; 3:10; 5:27,28,30,31; 6:56; 7:33; 8:22; 10:13; Luk 5:13; 6:19; 7:14,39; 8:44-47; 18:15; 22:51.

BUT THE DISCIPLES REBUKED THEM: Cp Mat 20:11: when some are rewarded, others murmur.

Mar 10:14

Note: faith (Rom 1:17; Gal 3:11; Heb 10:38), not ignorance (Eph 4:18), is essential to salvation.

TO SUCH AS THESE: That is, to those who are similar (in some respect) to these. Similarity? A childlike faith: cp Mat 19:23; Mar 10:23; Luk 18:24; 1Pe 2:2; 1Co 14:20; Mat 18:3,4; Psa 131:2.

Mar 10:15

Mar 10:15

But of course this cannot mean that the kingdom is closed to those who would first come to it as adults!

Mar 10:17

HIS WAY: Christ walks in the “way” of life — which is, first of all, the “way” of death, the “way” to Jerusalem, the “way” to the cross (cp Mar 10:32,52).

A MAN: “A certain ruler” (Luk 18:18).

Suggestion: the rich young ruler was Joseph Barnabas — who later does in fact heed the exhortation of Jesus (Acts 4:36,37).

WHAT MUST I DO?: Note stress on the word “DO”!

INHERIT: There was no good work learned from any good rabbi that could EARN eternal life. Cp Rom 9:31,32.

Mar 10:18

There was no “good” work, or any combination of “good” works, learned from any “good” rabbi that could EARN eternal life (cp Rom 9:31,32). Poss a roundabout argument also: ‘But if I really am good, then I must be from GOD!’

Mar 10:21

ONE THING YOU LACK: An allusion to Psa 23:1, LXX: “I shall want (or lack) nothing.” The rich young man lacked but one thing — ie Yahweh as his shepherd. Thus he lacked all things, ie all things meaningful. The remedy: “Come, and follow ME.”

KJV adds: “Take up your cross…”: “You have not the [need of] making of your own cross, although unbelief is a master carpenter at cross-making; neither are you permitted to choose your own cross, although self-will would fain be lord and master; but your cross is prepared and appointed for you by divine love, and you are cheerfully to accept it; you are to take up the cross as your chosen badge and burden, and not to stand cavilling at it. This night Jesus bids you submit your shoulder to His easy yoke. Do not kick at it in petulance, or trample on it in vain-glory, or fall under it in despair, or run away from it in fear, but take it up like a true follower of Jesus. Jesus was a cross-bearer; He leads the way in the path of sorrow. Surely you could not desire a better guide! And if He carried a cross, what nobler burden would you desire? The Way of the Cross is the way of safety; fear not to tread its thorny paths” (CHS).

Mar 10:22

HE WENT AWAY SAD: This young man is the only person in the Bible who is said to have gone from the presence of Jesus with sadness.

HE HAD GREAT WEALTH: Or rather, his wealth “had” him (Deu 6:10-13). “If your hand offends you, cut it off” (Mar 9:43). Ct Mat 20:34; Mar 10:52; Luk 18:43: the rich man loses all; the poor man gains all. Also ct Zaccheus, a wealthy man who gave it up (Luk 19:6,8).

Mar 10:23

“These words of Jesus covered not only the rich but the poor also. The rich man glorying in his riches is far from the Kingdom of God, but the poor man trusting in his hard-earned pittance is no nearer. Indeed the poor man may clutch his few pounds more tightly than a rich man his thousands. The emphasis in each is upon the same thing. Our trust must not be centred upon riches, great or small, or upon honour, or men, but upon God” (MP 283).

Mar 10:24

CHILDREN: V 19.

THOSE WHO TRUST IN RICHES: It is poss righteously to have riches, but not to trust in them: Abraham, David, Zaccheus. A theme of Christ’s parables: Luk 12:15-21; 16:19-31.

Mar 10:25

IT IS EASIER FOR A CAMEL TO GO THROUGH THE EYE OF A NEEDLE THAN FOR A RICH MAN TO ENTER THE KINGDOM OF GOD: “The proverbial saying… refers to the absolutely impossible… Attempts to weaken this hyperbole by taking ‘needle,’ not as a sewing needle, but as a small gate through which an unladen camel could just squeeze and only on his knees are misguided. This conjecture may come from some of Jerome’s allegorizing” (EBC).

An old Heb proverb: “Open a needle’s eye to God, and God will open to you a gate large enough for camels.”

“These words of Jesus covered not only the rich but the poor also. The rich man glorying in his riches is far from the Kingdom of God, but the poor man trusting in his hard-earned pittance is no nearer. Indeed the poor man may clutch his few pounds more tightly than a rich man his thousands. The emphasis in each is upon the same thing. Our trust must not be centred upon riches, great or small, or upon honour, or men, but upon God” (MP).

Mar 10:26

For every man of this world is “rich” is something: “rich” in pride, if nothing else.

Mar 10:31

“Do not take your salvation for granted… At our baptism, we do not step onto a smooth, effortless moving sidewalk that will automatically carry us comfortably into the Kingdom, though many act as though they assume this is so. Rather we stand at the foot of a steep and rugged hill, and there is no ski-lift. That hill is our probation: the ‘working out of our salvation with fear and trembling.’ God knows the height and degree of difficulty of our hill, and He knows the lifespan before us that He has given us to climb it. We shall need ALL that time, and all the available help He has provided and promised in so many ways. How long is it since your baptism? How far up the hill of God have you faithfully climbed? There are tempting but fatal relaxing places along the way, among them that deceptive worldly conceit called ‘retirement.’ Are you in one of them? The day draws on, and the top is still above you” (GVG).

“Why is it that the last shall be first? What is it that makes this so difficult to accept? The answer came in the form of an ugly little dog. Sophie has taken over our hearts and in many respects our house. She is not particularly pretty (one ear stands up and one lies down, and she has patches of hair that inexplicably shoot up like a lion’s mane); nor does she have any pedigree. She is, however, a good little dog and clearly loves us. She follows me wherever I go all over the house. She can’t stand to be away from me. When I do go away and come into the house, I receive a greeting of a king. When I walk into the house, this little dog is celebrating like this is the most miraculous thing that has even happened — her master came home!

“Isn’t this a little how God views us? Let’s face it, we don’t provide God with a whole lot of value. He doesn’t really ‘need’ us any more than I ‘need’ my dog. What we do provide Him is love, devotion and faithfulness. When Jesus comes back, will we celebrate like my dog celebrates when I come home? Or will we be like the bad dog who has spent the day chewing the sofa cushion, and then slinks off to hide? Do we follow our Master wherever He will lead us? Do we obey commands? Is our love demonstrative to Jesus in the way my dog’s love is to me?…

“Many of the qualities we attribute to great men — intelligence, boldness, speaking abilities, education, beauty, wealth, etc — mean absolutely nothing to God. In fact, these attributes can impede our service to God if they translate into pride. God loves us because we love Him (even though He loved us first!), and even if we are like ugly little dogs!

” ‘Brothers, think of what you were when you were called. Not many of you were wise by human standards; not many were influential; not many were of noble birth. But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong. He chose the lowly things of this world and the despised things — and the things that are not — to nullify the things that are, so that no one may boast before him’ (1Co 1:26-29)” (KT).

Mar 10:32

UP TO JERUSALEM: His face set like a flint (Isa 50:7). The good shepherd going before his sheep (Joh 10:4).

Mar 10:35

This request is also made by the mother of James and John (Mat 20:20,21).

Mar 10:37

Soon they would see Christ crucified, with two thieves on his right and left.

Mar 10:38

Note that Jesus does not question their sincerity.

CUP: Sym judgment (Psa 11:6; 75:8; Jer 49:12; Lam 4:21; Hab 2:16), God’s fury (Isa 51:17,22; Rev 14:10; 16:19); suffering (Eze 23:31-33). Cp thought in Joh 18:11.

Mar 10:39

They would suffer also: cp Act 14:22; 2Ti 2:11,12; 1Co 15:29n; Mar 8:34.

Mar 10:40

See Heb 12:2. Cp order here.

Mar 10:42

LORD IT OVER THEM: Calling themselves “Benefactors” — a title (Luk 22:25n).

Mar 10:43

“From the words of Jesus to His disciples we may properly conclude that there is nothing wrong with the desire to be great, provided:

  • we seek the right kind of greatness;
  • we allow God to decide what greatness is;
  • we are willing to pay the full price that greatness demands; and
  • we are content to wait for the judgment of God to settle the matter at last!

“It is vitally important, however, that we know what Christ meant when He used the word great in relation to people. No one whose heart has had a vision of God will ever consent to think of himself as being great. There are two kinds of greatness recognized in the Scriptures: an absolute uncreated greatness belonging to God alone, and a relative and finite greatness achieved by or bestowed upon certain friends of God and sons and daughters of faith, who by obedience and self-denial seek to become as much like God as possible” (AWT).

Mar 10:45

RANSOM: “Lutron”: means of loosing, ie from the law of Moses: cp 1Ti 2:6; Rom 3:24. See Lesson, Redemption.

FOR MANY: “Anti”: thus, “in place of many”, ie the many sacrifices of the Law of Moses. Not: “a ransom on behalf of many”.

Mar 10:46

Was Jesus leaving (Mat 20:29; Mar 10:46) or approaching (Luk 18:35) Jericho? Prob he was between an old part of the city and the new part of the city — hence the difference.

THEY CAME TO JERICHO: The city of palm trees, who lift up righteous hands to heaven (Psa 92:12; Song 7:7).

AS JESUS AND HIS DISCIPLES… WERE LEAVING THE CITY: The city of the curse (Jos 6:26).

BARTIMAEUS: Mark frequently uses Aramaic expressions: Boanerges (Mar 3:17), Talitha koum (Mar 5:41), Korban (Mar 7:11), Ephphatha (Mar 7:34), Rabbi (Mar 9:5; 11:21; 14:45), Bartimaeus (Mar 10:46), Abba (Mar 14:36), Golgotha (Mar 15:22), Eloi (Mar 15:34).

There were actually two beggars (Mat 20:29). Typifies the blind Gentiles, healed by Christ, the “Light of the world”.

TIMAEUS: Sig “unclean”.

BEGGING: A man must be conscious of his poverty before he starts to beg.

Mar 10:47

OF NAZARETH: The despised Branch of healing (Mat 2:23n). Nazareth = “netzer”, branch: cp Isa 11:1 (“Branch out of root of Jesse”).

Mar 10:48

ALL THE MORE: Like the widow in Luk 18:1-8.

Mar 10:49

“CALL HIM.” SO THEY CALLED: A second-hand call, a great test of faith.

Mar 10:50

THROWING HIS CLOAK ASIDE: Not something a blind person would typically do! “Cast aside sin which so easily besets us” (Heb 12:2). How do we react when our worldly possessions get in our way? He groped in “darkness” to find Jesus!

Mar 10:52

He leaves the city of the curse (see Mar 10:46n), and follows Jesus to the city of blessing.

Mark 11

Mar 11:1

Mar 11: “The crowds are gathering in Jerusalem for the time of Passover. There is a triumphant entry into Jerusalem, as the Lord Jesus approached for the last time. For a moment the people responded, realising to some extent the significance of this prophet of Nazareth, until the leaders of the Ecclesia turned them against him. The record reveals: (1) Triumphal entry into Jerusalem: vv 1-10. (2) In Jerusalem: v 11. (3) The barren fig tree: vv 12-14. (4) Second cleansing of the temple: vv 15-17. (5) Murderous hatred of the priests: v 18. (6) Lesson of the withered fig tree: vv 20-26. (7) Jesus’ authority questioned: vv 27-33.

“The solitary fig tree by the wayside, evidently upon an eminence, for it was seen ‘afar off.’ It represented the very nation that was typified by the fig throughout its history. The tree was precocious, having leaves but no fruit. It should have contained fruit throughout the year. Its ostentatious show of leaves was like the fig leaf covering of Adam and Eve. It was a graphic illustration of Israel, and Christ’s parables” (GEM).

BETHPHAGE: “House of figs”, natural Israel.

BETHANY: “House of dates”, spiritual Israel. Upright palms of the Gentiles. The home of Mary, Martha, and Lazarus.

AT THE MOUNT OF OLIVES: “On that day his feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, east of Jerusalem” (Zec 14:4).

Mar 11:2

COLT: Colt of an ass, humble — used by kings rather than the horse. Peaceful burden-bearer.

WHICH NO ONE HAS EVER RIDDEN: “No man can serve two masters.” Uniqueness, separateness. Cp the tomb of Jesus: “in which no one had ever been laid” (John 19:41).

Mar 11:4

TIED AT A DOORWAY: “Door” = Christ in Joh 10:7.

IN THE STREET: “In a place where two ways met” (AV). “Met”, not “parted”: (1) Jews and Gentiles, or (2) Two natures of Jesus, human and divine.

This is the story of our lives. We constantly find ourselves at the point where two ways meet — and a decision must be made as to which way we will go.

Mar 11:7

“An unusual sympathy between rider and mount for an unbroken colt to walk quietly in the midst of a shouting crowd” (SMk 152). Also, a suggestion that Jesus was not a very large man?

THREW THEIR CLOAKS OVER IT: Sig Christ the burden-bearer (Mat 11:28-30).

Mar 11:8

Let us lay the garments of our glory in the dust at Jesus’ feet.

BRANCHES: Palm branches (Joh 12:13).

Mar 11:9

Psa 118:19-26: a familiar psa sung at Passover and Pentecost, including: “open the gates… rejected stone… blessed is he that comes… bind sacrifice to the horns of the altar…” (Quoted by Christ himself as applicable to the Messiah: Mat 21:42.)

HOSANNA: “Save, pray”, from Psa 118:25: “Save, now, we beseech thee, O Lord.”

Generally… “Sing, O Daughter of Zion; shout aloud, O Israel! Be glad and rejoice with all your heart, O Daughter of Jerusalem! The LORD has taken away your punishment, he has turned back your enemy. The LORD, the King of Israel, is with you; never again will you fear any harm. On that day they will say to Jerusalem, ‘Do not fear, O Zion; do not let your hands hang limp. The LORD your God is with you, he is mighty to save. He will take great delight in you, he will quiet you with his love, he will rejoice over you with singing.’ The sorrows for the appointed feasts I will remove from you; they are a burden and a reproach to you” (Zep 3:14-18).

“This is what is done for the man the king delights to honor!” (Est 6:6,9).

Mar 11:11

HE LOOKED AROUND AT EVERYTHING: The final survey, the day of visitation.

HE WENT OUT TO BETHANY: The Glory departs: Eze 10:1,19; 11:23; Heb 13:3. Why? Because of the abominations inside. “Outside the camp” (Heb 13:13).

Mar 11:13

SEASON: “Kairos” = harvest, or reaping, as in Mat 13:30; Gal 6:9. It was not harvest time for figs; but yet some early fruit should have been there (Xd 121:336; LB 349). First-ripe figs are usually formed before the leaves. Green figs are edible too. See Luk 13:7. Outward pretense, show. As in Eden, rep a vain attempt to cover “nakedness”.

Mar 11:14

“In some sheltered spot by the roadside a fig tree attracted the attention of Jesus, as it must have drawn the wondering eyes of many travellers on their way to the Passover. At that time of the year fig trees were normally without either fruit or leaves. The sight suited his purpose well for it presented him with the opportunity of giving a practical illustration of the parable of the barren fig tree, and of completing a picture which had been left in abeyance. The time of figs was not yet; they appeared before the leaves. Here was a fig tree which made great boast of itself, challenging those who passed by to behold from the richness of its foliage, the succulence of its fruit. Yet, accepting the invitation, the hungry wayfarer was doomed to disappointment, for in spite of its lofty pretensions this tree was no better than the other trees. Its fault lay not so much in its barrenness as in its empty promises. No more penetrating picture of Israel can be imaged than that afforded by this sheltered tree with its abundance of green leaves stirring gently in the morning air. Nor can we confine the picture to natural Israel. It must ever be a challenge to Israel after the spirit also. The richness of the promise must be supported by the abundance of the fruit” (MP 298).

MAY NO ONE EVER EAT FRUIT FROM YOU AGAIN: The cursing of the priesthood of Israel: Leaves = healing (Rev 22:2), but the priests (and Israel’s other leaders) could not heal (Jer 6:14; 8:11,13,15,22; ct Mat 21:14).

Mar 11:15

The purging of the leaven from the house of God (Exo 12:19). “The action of the Lord in cleansing the temple is often quoted as an example of righteous indignation. Yet in all the four records (Mat 21, Mar 11, Luk 19, Joh 2) it is nowhere stated that the Lord was angry. Certainly it was not righteous indignation which drove back those soldiers, ordered to arrest him (Joh 7:46); nor was it righteous indignation which made armed men retreat and fall to the ground in Gethsemane (Joh 18:6). Was not the same power at work in the temple incident? But even if we concede that the Lord might have been expressing righteous indignation, what right have we unrighteous ones to claim that we can also show righteous indignation? It is more likely that we are confusing righteous indignation with wrathful feelings of revenge, personal provocation, and wounded pride. Certainly the Lord never lost his temper. Every word and action was under complete control” (Bilton, Xd 114:218).

The tables of moneychangers, overturned by Jesus, while the coins fall on the floor (Mat 21:12; Luk 19:45; Joh 2:14). Cp this with Judas throwing the 30 pieces of silver into the temple (Mat 27:5). Imagine the coins clattering and clanking along the floor, while the priests scurried here and there to gather up and hide the evidence. In both cases, this was money paid for “sacrifices”!

// Mat 21:12-16 / Luk 19:45: Here is the second temple cleansing (cp Psa 69:9). The other sacrifices are driven away; Christ is soon to become the one true sacrifice… and so “the zeal for your house has consumed me” (as though he were an offering on the altar).

Mar 11:16

Traffic in oil and wine. There was also a shortcut through temple courts for regular commerce.

Mar 11:17

A symbolic indication that the court of the Gentiles was henceforth to be holy also (Gal 3:28). This scene took place in the court of the Gentiles (LTJM 114). By using this area for moneychangers, the leaders had forgotten their delegated role of witnessing to the Gentiles (Zec 9:8).

A HOUSE OF PRAYER: Cited from Isa 56:7. Not just a house where prayer is offered — which is true enough — but also a “house” (a spiritual house) built up by and consisting of prayers offered by many individuals. With our prayers we “build” the “house” in which God dwells.

Mar 11:20

Many detractors of our Lord have pointed with glee to what on the surface seems like a fit of petty anger on Christ’s part, spawned by His selfish appetite. In reality, it was probably unrealistic to expect figs at that time of year, a fact which He must have known quite well. Perhaps the key to the whole passage is in the fact that “his disciples heard it.”

It may be seen that Christ was using the barren fig tree to teach his disciples something they desperately needed to know. This might be called a living parable. Our Lord had just come from his triumphal entry into the city, having been proclaimed as King by the multitude (vv 7-11), knowing their shallow adoration would soon turn into cries for his death. Leaving the fig tree, he drove the money changers from the temple grounds, having recognized that they were not only exploiting all the Jews who entered, but had taken over the court of the Gentiles, using it as a shortcut through town (v 16) and a place of business (v 15), thus denying the possibility of true worship to all, both Jews and Gentiles. The fig tree was an object lesson on barrenness, typifying the Jewish nation’s condition in spite of their privileged heritage. This type of hypocritical fruitlessness receives condemnation (vv 20,21), exhibits a lack of faith (vv 24-26), and hinders our prayers (vv 24-26).

FROM THE ROOTS: Not gradually, ie with the uppermost branches first, but rather suddenly, supernaturally, from roots upward.

Mar 11:21

RABBI: Mark frequently uses Aramaic expressions: Boanerges (Mar 3:17), Talitha koum (Mar 5:41), Korban (Mar 7:11), Ephphatha (Mar 7:34), Rabbi (Mar 9:5; 11:21; 14:45), Bartimaeus (Mar 10:46), Abba (Mar 14:36), Golgotha (Mar 15:22), Eloi (Mar 15:34).

THE FIG TREE YOU CURSED HAS WITHERED: That is, immediately, upon Christ’s saying these words, its sap was dried up, it lost its verdure; its leaves were shriveled and shrunk up, and dropped off, and the whole was blasted. This tree was an emblem of the Jews: Christ being hungry, and very desirous of the salvation of men, came first to them, from whom, on account of their large profession of religion, and great pretensions to holiness, and the many advantages they enjoyed, humanly speaking, much fruit of righteousness might have been expected; but, alas! He found nothing but mere words, empty boasts, an outward show of religion, an external profession, and a bare performance of trifling ceremonies, and oral traditions; wherefore Christ rejected them, and in a little time after, the Gospel, was taken away from them, and their temple, city, and nation, entirely destroyed. Are we then, bringing forth “fruits meet for repentance” in our lives, or will we suffer the same de-creating blast that Christ afforded this sad fig tree nearly 2,000 years ago?

Mar 11:23

THIS MOUNTAIN: The mountain of Israel: cast out among other nations. Or, more specifically, the Temple mountain (sym law), to be removed in AD 70. Cp Mic 7:19 (sins cast into sea); Luk 17:6 (tree cast into sea).

Here, I think, the “all things” needs to be limited to “all things which are in accordance with the will of the Father”, or “all things which are for your ultimate benefit”. We are like little children; if we somehow were given ‘carte blanche’ to have anything and everything WE want, then there would be no end to the damage we could do to ourselves and others. We need to be protected from ourselves. A loving Father would never give us the keys to the “candy store”, and then leave us alone to gorge ourselves.

But… “all things” which work together for our ultimate salvation? Yes, of course, He will give us that. Consider Rom 8: “If God is for us, who can be against us? He who did not spare his own Son, but gave him up for us all — how will he not also, along with him, graciously give us ALL THINGS? Who will bring any charge against those whom God has chosen? It is God who justifies. Who is he that condemns? Christ Jesus, who died — more than that, who was raised to life– is at the right hand of God and is also interceding for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall trouble or hardship or persecution or famine or nakedness or danger or sword… No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.”

This passage puts the same point both positively and negatively: firstly, God will give us “all things” that will help us, to the utmost of His power, to attain to lasting faith, true forgiveness of sins, and a place in His kingdom. And thus we are assured that “nothing” (not even death itself, or terrible persecutions or trials) will keep us from the love of God in Christ, and a place in that Kingdom.

Having said that, I might add — yes, in fact, even the greatest “mountain” will be moved, if we ask it. First of all, the asking ought to be in keeping with the will of God. And secondly, Jesus didn’t state limitations as to TIME! One day, when Christ returns, the whole world will be “torn down” and “rebuilt” in a new and glorious “creation”, and every “mountain” (all the kingdoms, creations, wealth, and power of sinful man) will be brought low! It WILL happen. And we will be there to see it if we have faith as a grain of mustard seed, and if we pray for that day to come.

I’m looking forward to seeing all the “mountains” moved (Rev 6:14)! Maybe I’ll move a few myself… if Christ asks me to do so!

Is it possible that the greatest “mountain” is (and was) the “great stone” which sealed shut the tomb of Jesus (Mat 28:2-4; Mar 16:4; Luk 24:2; Joh 20:1)? And this mountain has already been moved!

Mar 11:24

BELIEVE THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED IT: Past tense, not present tense (as in AV): “Believe that God has blessed you in times past, and — because of your faith — He will bless you again.” Cp Deu 7:17,18; 1Sa 17:37; Psa 22:4; 34:6,7; 2Co 1:9-11.

Mar 11:25

FORGIVE HIM: “The fate of the barren fig tree is no excuse for a life in which the blasting of such trees becomes one’s obsession” (ADN 106).

ANYTHING… ANYONE: Notice the widest poss application.

Mar 11:27

Christ was policing the Temple. A follow-up on the cleansing of the Temple (Mat 21:12-17; Mar 11:15-19; Luk 19:45-48).

Mar 11:28

BY WHAT AUTHORITY: Three years before, Nicodemus had come as a delegate of the Sanhedrin. What had they done with his report? (Christ was not a Levite, a priest, nor in any way accredited by some rabbi. Wandering “holy men” were allowed to speak freely — but not with voice of authority, in Temple, etc.

Mar 11:29

Three years eariler, Nicodemus had come to Jesus as a delegate of Sanhedrin. What had they done with his report?

Mar 11:30

Of course, this WAS his answer: Jesus was accredited by John the Baptist. If they had tested John’s claim (Deu 18:21,22), they would have been prepared to accept Jesus.

Mar 11:33

NEITHER WILL I TELL YOU…: The evidence was already there. Their reasoning and understanding was based on flesh and on their own personal preferences — regardless of truth. They openly denied obvious truth: “By Beelzebub” (Mar 3:22,23,28).

Notice: they answer, “We don’t know” — which really means, “We won’t tell you.” Thus Jesus reciprocates in his answer: not “I don’t know”, but instead, “Neither will I tell you!”

Mark 12

Mar 12:1

// Isa 5:1-7.

IN PARABLES: Cp Mar 11:33: Yet Christ’s parables explain his origin and rebuke his enemies (v 12).

Mar 12:6

ONE… A SON: Many servants, but only one son.

Mar 12:8

When we cast the “true vine” (John 15) out of our vineyard, we will have no fruit!

OUT OF THE VINEYARD: “Outside the camp” (Heb 13:10-14). Note order in Luk 20:15: (1) took out of camp; and then (2) killed.

Mar 12:9

HE: God, not Christ. This is God’s wrath against Israel for their rejection of His Son. (In parable, the son is already dead!)

Mar 12:10

THE STONE: Cited from Psa 118:22; cp Eph 2:20.

Mar 12:12

TO ARREST HIM: Trying to fulfill prophecy (Mat 21:39; Mar 12:8; Luk 20:15), but time was not yet right.

The parables of Christ, when perceived, only brought their wickedness to the fore, and increased their hatred of him. They convicted themselves.

Mar 12:13

PHARISEES AND HERODIANS: Traditional enemies, but agreeing together against Christ. “An unholy alliance.”

TO CATCH HIM IN HIS WORDS: The Gr word is used often of the hunter trapping his prey (cp Pro 6:25,26).

But cleverness is no match for godliness.

Mar 12:14

Jesus did not bow down before the Jewish rulers.

IS IT RIGHT TO PAY TAXES TO CAESAR OR NOT?: A “no” would brand Jesus as rebel. A “yes” would destroy his influence with many of the people.

Mar 12:15

SHOULD WE PAY OR SHOULDN’T WE?: A repetition of the question. Indicates Jesus paused before answering them.

Mar 12:16

WHOSE PORTRAIT… WHOSE INSCRIPTION?: Christ is the image of the invisible God (2Co 4:4; Col 1:15; Joh 1:14).

Mar 12:17

See Ecc 12:13: “the whole duty of man”.

CAESAR… GOD: Modern governments confuse the two, putting on their money: “In God we trust”. Political considerations should play no part in the gospel.

GIVE: Or “give back”. The coin belonged to Caesar in the first place. Cp attitudes to riches: the extortioner (vv 40,41) and the poor widow (v 42).

As Christ held up the Roman coin, and asked his question, he was (by design?) offering a clear alternative to his audience: on the one hand, there was Caesar’s coin, with Caesar’s image and an identifying superscription — no doubt about ITS ownership! But on the other hand, there was Christ himself, made in the image of the invisible God (2Co 4:4; Col 1:15; Joh 1:14), and over him a different “superscription”: “This is My beloved Son!”

Which “image” and “superscription” will we choose? “Caesar” gives to us the coinage of this world, and we use it as we have need, and return to that “god of this world” a portion thereof, as he requests.

But God has given us the “image” of His Son — which is of course HIS OWN image! (Gen 1:27) — which may be imprinted in our hearts and minds. Thus we are remade in that image, from the inside out! Who cares to hoard the pitiful pieces of metal on which are stamped the crude impression of a corrupt and wicked “god”? Give them all back to the “god” from whence they came! But treasure the character, the inner man, which is stamped with the image of the One True God in the person of His Son — keep that safe and clean, so that it may finally be given back to God Himself: “Here, Father, is my gift, my tribute… Your Son’s image engraven upon my life! I give it all to you!”

Mar 12:18

SADDUCEES: Who accepted only first five books, authority of Moses, but not the prophets (Elp 233).

Mar 12:24

THE POWER OF GOD: God’s promises cannot be broken by the trivial human incident of death!

Mar 12:25

THEY WILL NEITHER MARRY…: Immortal men and women do not need descendants or heirs. A popular false doctrine of the times: cp Lesson, Enoch, Book of.

Mar 12:26

I AM THE GOD OF ABRAHAM…: “Though he were dead, yet shall he live” (Joh 11:25).

Mar 12:27

For God to be known through the ages as the “God” of 3 eternally dead men would be a mockery of His power.

Mar 12:34

YOU ARE NOT FAR…: Implying that other of his listeners WERE! And some of them even shut the door to the Kingdom against others: Mat 23:13.

NO ONE DARED TO ASK HIM ANY MORE QUESTIONS: This marks the end of the “examination” of Jesus during the four days that the Passover lamb was kept up — from the 10th to the 14th of the month. It is recorded in both other accounts: Mat 22:46; Mark 12:34; Luke 20:40.

Mar 12:36

UNTIL: See Lesson, AN, Conditional deferment.

Mar 12:37

THE LARGE CROWD: “The common people” (v 37) versus the proud people (v 38…).

Mar 12:41

THE TEMPLE TREASURY: In the Mishna it is said that “there were thirteen horn-shaped chests in the Temple”, receptacles for contributions. Each was labeled for specific contributions and evidently set up on the Court of the Women, where all contributors were in public view. It is at these trumpet-shaped chests, which Mark and Luke call “the treasury”, that the widow of Mar 12:41,42 and Luke 21:1,2 contributed her “mites.” Cp Mat 6:2: “When you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do.”

Mar 12:42

Ct the motives of the poor widow (here) and the rich extortioners (Mar 12:40,41; Luk 20:46,47). “God will reckon us to be benefactors, not by how much we give, but by how much we have left” (DG). Everything belongs to God; therefore, “render to God what is God’s” (Mar 12:17; Luk 20:25).

TWO VERY SMALL COPPER COINS: “It is easy to make offerings to the Lord which cost us little or nothing. The poor woman’s meagre gift was the greatest of all because it was so real a sacrifice. In the light of Christ’s judgment there are probably few of us who have given much. There may be some of us who have never really given anything. But there are those who have. Many mites have since been added to the two that fell into the temple treasury; offerings rich in their meagreness because they represented all the giver had to give. For the most part those gifts have remained unnoticed amid the welter of more obvious givings; where they are discovered they are sometimes scorned. But there is an unseen watcher who sees and knows, and in the fullness of time those children of the Kingdom whose poverty has excluded them from so many material blessings will be welcomed by the One who became poor that they might be rich” (MP 312).

Mar 12:44

We should give to Christ “all our living”!

Mark 13

Mar 13:1

Vv 1-3: “And now he and his disciples had departed from the temple. Once more they lingered in sweet retirement on the mount of Olives. The purple light on the mountains of Moab was fast fading out. Across the city the sinking sun cast a rich glow over the pillared cloisters of the temple, and over the silent courts as they rose terrace upon terrace. From where they stood they could see over the closed Beautiful Gate, and right to the entrance of the holy place, which now glittered with gold; while the eastern hills and the deep valley below were thrown into a solemn shadow, creeping, as the orb sunk lower, further and further towards the summit of Olivet, irradiated with one parting gleam of roseate light, after all below was sunk in obscurity. Then it was and there that the disciples, looking down upon the temple, pointed out to the Master: ‘What manner of stones and what buildings are here!’ The view from that site must have rendered belief in the Master’s prediction even more difficult and more sad. A few years more and it was all literally fulfilled” (Temple 59,60).

AS HE WAS LEAVING THE TEMPLE: The Glory of God departs from the city via the mountain on the east: Eze 11:23 (cp Acts 1:11: his final departure).

WHAT MASSIVE STONES: According to Josephus, huge stones, 70 ft long, 10 ft wide, 8 ft tall, in walls. 40-ft high white marble pillars — “whited sepulchres”. “Goodly stones” (Luk 21:5). Titus, etc, caused “Zion to be plowed as a field” (Mic 3:12). (Luk 21:5 adds “beautiful stones”.)

Mar 13:2

Cp Mat 21:21: “Mt removed and cast into sea”.

NOT ONE STONE WILL BE LEFT ON ANOTHER: Certain stones were even pried apart in order to collect the gold leaf that melted from the roof when the temple burned. Excavations in 1968 discovered many such stones thrown down into the valley.

True of temple building itself, but not true (as yet?) of the great foundation stones of the Temple Mount.

Mar 13:3

AS JESUS WAS SITTING ON THE MOUNT OF OLIVES: Instances of Jesus withdrawing into a mountain, apart — sometimes for privacy and prayer, and sometimes to instruct his followers: Mat 5:1; 8:1; 14:23; 15:29; 17:1; 24:3; 28:16; Mark 3:13; 6:46; 9:2; 13:3; Luke 6:12; 9:28; 22:39; John 6:3,15; 8:1.

Mar 13:4

WHEN WILL THESE THINGS HAPPEN…?: The disciples, of course, expected that Christ would “come” as King, with a royal presence, and to remove the Romans and thrown down the corrupt temple, all at the same time and soon!

Mar 13:6

False Messiahs: “(1) Josephus says (War, b.ii.c.13) that there were many who, pretending to Divine inspiration, deceived the people, leading out numbers of them to the desert, pretending that God would there show them the signs of liberty, meaning redemption from the Roman power: and that an Egyptian false prophet led 30,000 men into the desert, who were almost all cut off by Felix. See Acts 21:38. It was a just judgment for God to deliver up that people into the hands of false Christs who had rejected the true one. Soon after our Lord’s crucifixion, Simon Magus appeared, and persuaded the people of Samaria that he was the great power of God, Acts 8:9,10; and boasted among the Jews that he was the son of God. (2) Of the same stamp and character was also Dositheus, the Samaritan, who pretended that he was the Christ foretold by Moses. (3) About twelve years after the death of our Lord, when Cuspius Fadus was procurator of Judea, arose an impostor of the name of Theudas, who said he was a prophet, and persuaded a great multitude to follow him with their best effects to the river Jordan, which he promised to divide for their passage; and saying these things, says Josephus, he deceived many: almost the very words of our Lord. (4) A few years afterwards, under the reign of Nero, while Felix was procurator of Judea, impostors of this stamp were so frequent that some were taken and killed almost every day: Jos Ant b.xx.c.4,7” (Clarke).

Mar 13:8

EARTHQUAKES: The May 1984 National Geographic shows through color photos and drawings the swift and terrible destruction that wiped out the Roman cities of Pompeii and Herculaneum in AD 79. The explosion of Mount Vesuvius was so sudden, the residents were killed while in their routine: men and women were at the market, the rich in their luxurious baths, slaves at toil. They died amid volcanic ash and superheated gases. Even family pets suffered the same quick and final fate. It takes little imagination to picture the panic of that terrible day. The saddest part is that these people did not have to die.

Scientists confirm what ancient Roman writers record — weeks of rumblings and shakings preceded the actual explosion. Even an ominous plume of smoke was clearly visible from the mountain days before the eruption. If only they had been able to read and respond to Vesuvius’s warning!

There are similar “rumblings” in our world: warfare, earthquakes, the nuclear threat, economic woes, breakdown of the family and moral standards. While not exactly new, these things do point to a coming Day of Judgment. People need not be caught unprepared. God warns and provides an escape to those who will heed the rumblings.

Mar 13:9

COUNCILS… SYNAGOGUES… GOVERNORS… KINGS:

Act 4:1-22: Apostles at Jerusalem. Act 5:17-42: Apostles at Jerusalem. Act 6:11 — 7:60: Stephen at Jerusalem. Act 12:11: James and Peter before Herod Agrippa. Act 16:19-40: Paul and Silas at Philippi. Act 17:5-9: Jason and others at Thes. Act 18:12-17: Paul before Gallio at Cor. Act 19:29-41: Gaius and Aristarchus at Eph. Act 21:27–23:11: Paul in Jerusalem. Act 24:1-21: Paul before Felix in Caesarea. Act 25:6-12: Paul before Festus. Act 26:1-32: Paul before Agrippa.

SYNAGOGUES: Synagogues were used not only for school and worship, but also for administration and trials.

Mar 13:12

The Jewish plot: to wreck the developing ecclesias from within: 2Pe 2:1; 1Jo 4:1; 2Co 11:26.

Mar 13:13

Cp Rev 2:10; Heb 10:36,39.

Mar 13:14

THE ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION: The // passage in Luk 21:20 has: “Jerusalem being surrounded by armies”!

LET THOSE WHO ARE IN JUDEA FLEE TO THE MOUNTAINS: To Pella (Tes 48:25,26). Cp days of Lot (Gen 19:17).

“To advise anyone to flee from a city already encircled by a besieging army sounds the height of absurdity; nevertheless this was the instruction, which the saints of those days received from their Lord. Nor was there any absurdity, for throughout the siege Titus, the Roman general, seems to have been actuated by an earnest desire to keep destruction of both life and property to a minimum — so much so that, according to Josephus, in the early days of the siege there were several opportunities for flight. At one time, for example, the siege of Jerusalem was as good as raised for a period of four days, so casual was the watch maintained by the Roman army. In another place Josephus writes (2.20.1): After the first attack upon the city many of the most considerable of the Jewish folk forsook it as men do a sinking ship. Eusebius, the Christian historian, has this similar narrative: ‘The whole body of the church at Jerusalem, having been commanded by a divine Revelation given to men of approved piety there, before the war removed from the city, and dwelt in a certain town beyond Jordan, called Pella; there those that believed in Christ having removed from Jerusalem, as if holy men had entirely abandoned the royal city itself, and the whole land of Judea, the divine justice for their crimes against Christ and his Apostles finally overtook them, totally destroying the whole generation of those evil-doers from the earth’ (Eccl Hist 3.5)” (WRev).

Mar 13:15

LET NO ONE ON THE ROOF… ENTER THE HOUSE: But rather descend stairs on outside of house — ie in extreme haste (LB 43).

Mar 13:18

IN WINTER: When the wadis would be swollen with floods.

Mar 13:19

DISTRESS UNEQUALED FROM THE BEGINNING: “A time of trouble such as never was” (Dan 12:1; cp Joe 2:2; Jer 30:7; Amo 8:8; Zech 14:4; Isa 2:21).

Mar 13:20

CUT SHORT THOSE DAYS: The civil wars of Jewish factions inside the city shortened considerably its siege and suffering. The city fell in only 5 months.

Mar 13:24

SUN… MOON… STARS: Symbols used to describe Israel: Jer 31:35,36 (also, Gen 37:9,10; 15:5; 22:17; Amo 8:8; Mic 3:6; Song 6:10; Isa 24:23; Jer 33:20-26; Joe 2:10,30-32; Act 2:20; Rev 6:12; 8:12; 12:1). Or, more literally: 2Pe 3:7,10; Isa 24:18.

Mar 13:26

CLOUDS: The Divine glory revealed in Israel as cloud (Exo 13:21,22; 14:19,20,24; 16:10; 19:16-19; 20:18; 24:15-19; 33:18-21 with Exo 34:4-7; 40:34-38; Num 10:34; 12:5,10; 14:9,10,14,21,22; Deu 31:14,15; Psa 105:39; 1Co 10:1,2). The same Shekinah glory appeared to Abraham (Gen 15:17; Act 7:2), David (Psa 18:6-15), Ezekiel (Eze 1:4; 10:4); Elijah (1Ki 19:11-13), Job (Job 38:1), apostles (Luk 9:34,35). Judgments of God in last days are manifest in this cloud (Dan 7:13; Joe 2:2; Zep 1:15; Eze 30:3; Isa 19:1; 25:5). Jesus will so come from heaven (Act 1:9,11; Luk 21:27; Mat 26:64).

Mar 13:28

FIG TREE: Luk 21:29 has “fig tree and all the trees”: “Fig tree” = unsatisfactory covering: Gen 3. Fig sym Israel: Mar 11:13-21; Luk 13:6,7; Jer 24; Hos 9:10; Mic 7:1. “All trees”: Intense national pride; proliferation of nations in Middle East: Psalm 83 lists 10 nations — giving their ancient names — which will join together in their determination to destroy Israel as a nation in the Last Days. Likewise, recent Mideast history has seen ten Arab nations, occupying generally the same territory as the nations of Psa 83, gain their independence during the same generation (1922–1971) that saw the rebirth of the nation of Israel in 1948. There are currently, in the area occupied by the old Roman Empire, exactly 10 such independent Arab nations. This scenario even allows for the infamous eleventh “horn” of Dan 7, which arises after the others and acts as a catalyst in the defeat and persecution of Israel — the incipient “nation” of Palestine. Not yet independent, will this be the eleventh horn which comes up among, and after, the former ten?: 1. Egypt (1922) 2. Saudi Arabia (1932) 3. Iraq (1932) 4. Lebanon (1943) 5. Syria (1946) 6. Jordan (1949) 7. Kuwait (1963) 8. Bahrain (1971) 9. Qatar (1971) 10. United Arab Emirates (1971) and 11. Palestine (?)

TENDER: In ct to the previous fig tree (Mar 11:13), cursed by Christ, this tree puts forth tender branches (the first sign of fruit).

Mar 13:30

THIS GENERATION: “This is generation of them that seek your face” (Psa 24:6 and context). “Genera”, in general, a race (NIV mg; the Jewish race: Luk 21:28,29), but sometimes a single generation. Possibly, “this present evil order of things”, which continues until Christ returns.

Mar 13:32

NOR THE SON: Notice that Jesus had Daniel to read. Thus, Daniel alone is not enough to predict the time of the Kingdom accurately! “If Jesus could not use the book of Daniel to know the precise time of the end, what hope for anyone else?” (LD 15).

Mar 13:35

// Isa 26:20,21.

Mar 13:37

WHAT I SAY TO YOU, I SAY TO EVERYONE, “WATCH!”: What is entailed in watching? Jesus answers this question elsewhere, in the parallel account: “Be careful, or your hearts will be weighed down with dissipation, drunkenness and the anxieties of life, and that day will close on you unexpectedly like a trap. For it will come upon all those who live on the face of the whole earth. Be always on the watch, and pray that you may be able to escape all that is about to happen, and that you may be able to stand before the Son of Man.” (Luk 21:34-36).

I just had an interesting letter from an old friend — we haven’t corresponded in some time, and so we’re “catching up”. He writes: “It’s kind of funny; I used to be so diligent in watching the signs of the times, but I’m not sure it was much more than seeking for knowledge, rather than watching to make sure I was doing the right things. Now, I’m more interested in how I’m living the Truth, whether I’m ‘living right’; how what I do affects my family; how I’m able to help others to hold on to the Truth and how I might be able to interest others in finding life, instead of the certain death that awaits so many.”

I told him I appreciated that point of view; he made a good point quite concisely.

I have a favorite cartoon (actually, several favorite cartoons, but I’ll mention one in particular): It involves Woodstock, Snoopy’s bird friend, one of the lesser known characters in “Peanuts”.

in one of Snoopy’s elaborate play-acting schemes, his doghouse is the fortress and Woodstock is standing guard. Snoopy, the captain, leaves him instructions: “Watch out for the enemy!” So Woodstock starts marching back and forth on top of the doghouse, but because he’s so concerned about the “enemy” “out there” somewhere, and trying to look every direction at once, he doesn’t keep his eyes on where he’s going… and takes about three serious falls off the ends of the house. When Snoopy finds him, dazed and a bit worse for wear after the last fall, he helps him stand upright again, puts the helmet on his head, and the gun in his hand, and then leaves him with a final instruction: “Maybe you’d better just watch out for yourself!”

We all have a duty to be “watchmen”… but “watching” can take several forms. And I do not mean to denigrate any of them: there is “watching” the “signs of the times”, “watching” for the welfare of the brotherhood, “watching” for the needs of one’s family and close associates, etc. But it’s always a desideratum (JT word: “the thing greatly to be desired”) to “watch” out for oneself… how one walks, how one lives, how one speaks, how one writes.

And we should all take care, lest while we are “watching” in 15 different directions, and doing that many different things, we don’t make serious missteps personally, that may do spiritual damage to ourselves, and to those whom we are trying so hard to help.